Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Edwards Drops Out of Presidential Race

Posted by Paddy , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 5:17 AM on January 30, 2008.


MSNBC is saying that it's very unlikely that Edwards would throw his endorsement to Clinton. Obama says he would "love" to have Edwards' support.
t1home.edwards.ap

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Chuck Todd is on MSNBC saying that the scheduled speech that Edwards was going to give in New Orleans today is abruptly turning around and will be a concession speech.

Todd also saying that it is very unlikely that Edwards would throw his endorsement to Clinton.

More as I get it. (I took the question mark off the headline. Looks to be firm)

DENVER (AP) - Democrat John Edwards is exiting the presidential race Wednesday, ending a scrappy underdog bid in which he steered his rivals toward progressive ideals while grappling with family hardship that roused voter's sympathies but never diverted his campaign, The Associated Press has learned.

The two-time White House candidate notified a close circle of senior advisers that he planned to make the announcement at a 1 p.m. EST event in New Orleans that had been billed as a speech on poverty, according to two of his advisers.

The decision came after Edwards lost the four states to hold nominating contests so far to rivals who stole the spotlight from the beginning - Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

UPDATE:

Leaving the race: Obama offered this statement on the withdrawal of John Edwards from the presidential race:

"John Edwards has spent a lifetime fighting to give voice to the voiceless and hope to the struggling, even when it wasn't popular to do or covered in the news. At a time when our politics is too focused on who's up and who's down, he made a nation focus again on who matters - the New Orleans child without a home, the West Virginia miner without a job, the families who live in that other America that is not seen or heard or talked about by our leaders in Washington. John and Elizabeth Edwards have always believed deeply that we can change this - that two Americans can become one, and that our country can rally around this common purpose. So while his campaign may end today, the cause of their lives endures for all of us who still believe that we can achieve that dream of one America."

ABC Interview:

In an exclusive interview with ABC News, Sen. Barack Obama said that he has let former Sen. John Edwards know that he would like his endorsement should Edwards decide to drop out of the race. While Obama did not admit to rumors of back-door-dealings for delegate sharing, he said that he would strongly welcome a nod from Edwards.

"There is no doubt that I would love John's support, but I also respect the fact that he is in this contest. He is actively seeking the nomination, and he is a formidable candidate," Obama told "Nightline" co-anchor Terry Moran.

*For more on this story, click here

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, edwards

Paddy is a regular contributor to Cliff Schecter.com.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hard Day
Posted by: dustinblythe on Jan 30, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sucks. This is John Edwards' decision and I respect it, but it is very hard to believe that it is over. For me it started with a spur of the moment road trip to Des Moines in December of 2006 to see Edwards' announcement that he would be running. From there I came back to Indiana, helped start a One Corps chapter to drum up interest for Edwards in my area, participated in local events, made another road trip in April of '07 to see Edwards at a town hall meeting in Davenport Iowa, I helped staff a fundraiser in Michigan City where I got my picture taken with the Senator, made another road trip to freezing cold Mason City Iowa to go door to door in the days before the Iowa Caucus and since then I have been working feverishly to get signatures to ensure that Sen. Edwards would appear on Indiana's primary ballot.

After all of that it will be hard to up and switch to another candidate. My gut feeling is that I will back Obama but it is going to take me a couple of weeks to get over this one.

When the Indiana Pacers went to the NBA finals a few years ago and lost in seven games to the Lakers, a reporter asked coach Larry Bird what his initial reaction was. He said, "I will probably be miserable for the rest of my life." and walked off the dais. That is about how I feel now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hard Day Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Hard Day Posted by: bbfmail
» He Doesn't Deserve The Compliment Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: Hard Day Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Hard Day Posted by: ncdemmom
» RE: Hardly Dead Posted by: gazooks
Another Vctory for "Bullshit"*
Posted by: MobileSucks on Jan 30, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heard on CNN somebody talking about this and they were saying all this negative stuff about Edwards, just line after line of criticism. I made a point to go over to the TV to see who this was, thinking it was a Republican or "conservative" big mouth. It was the one and only Joe Klein.

According to I guess mainstream media Klein is supposed to be more of a liberal right? ANd here this famous journalist/commentator was spewing out these brilliant insights about Edwards not knowing how to talk to people-not being able to "have a conversation" with folks, and how "America has never elected an 'angry President'". Angry, Klein says.. There was so much more too! It was amazing listening to this person. Well, that's CNN, Time Magazine, and all the rest of them for you isn't it? They had it in for Edwards the whole time.

I think Edwards did the one thing you are not allowed to do when it comes to domestic issues -- he talked about class too much. So you seriouslytalk about poverty and your called "angry" and your therefor "unelectable". You can talk about poverty if you smile real big and promise us a bright new tomorrow and "change" without actually saying anything about why people are bad off, or what, as President you'll really do about it. Call it "The Audacity of Bullshit". People like Joe Klein gobble it up and drop as much on us as they can.

*See more On Bullshit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who profits?
Posted by: Axiom69 on Jan 30, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder who will attact more of Edwards supporters, Obama or Hillary? The fact that he dropped out now will probably change the dynamics of super Tuesday. It's going to be an interesting week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who profits? Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Who profits? Posted by: EdinIowa
I Sensed...
Posted by: Wacre on Jan 30, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that this was coming when I heard that Edwards was going to give a major speech on poverty in New Orleans, the same place he launched his campaign from (though part of me also believed it to be an attempt to light a fire under his campaign by doing something that no one expected of him).

It saddens me somewhat to see that the only candidate that seemed to give a shite about those of us who aren't as well off leave the race for the Presidency.

I have to really think about this because while I can't see myself voting for Hillary, I need to see something of a more populist vein out of Obama. I mean, this talk of a vague, amorphous change is getting somewhat tired. I want to hear exactly what he is planning to do. I understand that the reality might differ somewhat, but at least some type of outline how he is going to help the worse off among us, and any plans to get us out of Iraq pronto would be appreciated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Sensed... Posted by: reval
» RE: I Sensed... Posted by: Wacre
» RE: I Sensed... Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: I Sensed... Posted by: reval
» RE: I Sensed... Posted by: Wacre
It's All Over
Posted by: pdxstudent on Jan 30, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no more doubt about it: we are going to have a neo-liberal democratic nominee, unless somehow the United States has a closet obsession with Mike Gravel.

Ironically, save for Gravel still being in it, this is the only way we can have a fair election anyway. By fair, of course, I mean a majority of votes will actually be required for them to continue winning. Most of the states won by the neo-liberals so far have been decided by a minority of voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's All Over Posted by: peacefullaim
Those of us who support him can only hope
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Jan 30, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that there will be a place for him in the next Democratic administration. I would love to see him as Attorney General.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Media Wins Again
Posted by: JackieGiles on Jan 30, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The did it to Dean and they've done it to Edwards.

"Angry" was he? There's a helluva lot to be angry about and there is such a thing as "righteous anger", and many Americans share Edwards', I know I do!

I hope he uses his endorsement to persuade Obama to make his health care plan truly universal and stiffens his backbone when he deals with corporations,lobbyists and insurance companies.

I'm leaning toward Obama now and it would take a tornado to blow me the other way.

The bottom line for me is: we must elect a Democratic President and grow the majorities in the House and Senate, THEN, HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE!

JOHN EDWARDS FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL OR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad day in Mudville
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 30, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew something wasn't right the moment I woke up this morning.

Many thanks once again to the mainstream media and it's supposedly "alternative" brethren for framing this race as only being between two people. If Edwards had gotten a fraction of the free press the other two have enjoyed this would have been a very different race.

That's all folks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sad day in Mudville Posted by: mnascimento
I had so hoped...
Posted by: badkitty on Jan 30, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had so hoped that Edwards would gain some traction on February 5. I'll tell you, California never wins! Always, always, the candidates you want to support are out of the race by the time you vote! And we even moved up the primary this year! I think my family and I will still vote for Edwards--after all, it's still our chance to vote for someone we really like, even though we will probably have to hold our noses in the fall and vote for Hillary or Hillary-lite. It would be nice to have Edwards define "change" in his speech today, just so Obama, and Clinton, understand exactly what it is and stop using the word so lightly. By the end of a Clinton or Obama administration, we won't just be the second most powerful nation in the world, we'll be the third. And that's if one of them gets elected...if a Republican is elected, I'm guessing government won't even finance infrastructure any more. The gap between the two Americas will be huge!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate media
Posted by: frank69 on Jan 30, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards criticised corporations. The corporate media doesn't like him and didn't really cover his campaign.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corporate media Posted by: bomec
» RE: Corporate media Posted by: Basenjis
» the haircut scandal Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Corporate media Posted by: Shey
I am sad but happy
Posted by: lilithesque on Jan 30, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have voted green (but never when bush was a choice)and been a Kucinich delagate and am tired of knowingly voting for someone who will lose to make a point. Sadly I saw a vote for Edwards as a vote for Hilary at least SC. I really prefer edwards and was for edwards but leaning towards Obama until he lost SC. Then I couldn't justify voting for edwards when that really only benifits Hilary. I was poor when clinton the first was in office and it was bad. I see Hilary as a continuation of the steady trend to the right of our overall gov. and her votes on bankrupcy and DLC leadership and her saying nothing is off the table regarding war with Iran among lots of other things makes me an OBAMA girl. I live and vote in CO so I am a super duper tuesday girl.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deeply Feeling This Loss
Posted by: ninakat on Jan 30, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a feminist voter, in a race rife with identity politics, I always felt safe in thinking that--in an awareness of the issues, and the candidates' takes on them--Edwards was the right candidate for me. Now I feel like this race is in trouble...

Has this country changed since Jesse Jackson and Geraldine Ferraro were in the running? Of course! Are we now rid of the institutionalized racism and sexism that is part of the U.S. culture? No Way! I think the loss of Edwards as a viable candidate will bring out all the ugliness this country has to offer. Call me deeply cynical--perhaps I am. I just don't want people voting for some Republican because they can't get over their feelings about a black man or a woman (and a Clinton to boot) becoming president.

I want to be wrong. I really, really want to be wrong. But what if I'm right? I approach the upcoming primary in my state with a heavy heart and a tough decision to make: issues vs. electability??

On a brighter note, I'm delighted to see so many alternet readers both saddened and supportive of Edwards. I feel that he was really necessary to move Obama and Clinton further left, and I hope his influence will not be lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This was all about the Right and their choice
Posted by: ordaj on Jan 30, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the beginning "they" wanted either a black or female candidate. The machine can then be geared up to attack. There will be another Republican President come January.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's started already Posted by: ordaj
» RE: It's started already Posted by: Trazom
» RE: It's started already Posted by: 2dogarage
» The solution. Posted by: luckypuck
It is really very sad...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 30, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to see the most progressive candidate left, now out of the race. At least he kept the discussion in that direction. Now we will continue to see the race lean to the right again.

I am disappointed that he did this as he stated he was in it till the conventions. I guess no ones word is good anymore. I should not be surprised.

In any event, it looks like I will be voting for a third party candidate for the first time in my life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is really very sad... Posted by: peacefullaim
CommentatorIdiots
Posted by: TiredoftheLies on Jan 30, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone notice the commentary by the red-headed idiot who Nora O'Donnell interviewed on MSNBC about Edwards dropping out? The guy made a comment to the effect that Edwards was stepping down gracefully in the same tradition or same way as Robert Kennedy! Did this guy ever have a history lesson on the Democratic race where Robert Kennedy was the candidate, and was ASSASSINATED before he made it to the convention? HE DID NOT STEP DOWN FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE, HE FELL DOWN WHEN HE WAS SHOT! Nobody calls these idiots on their inane, stupid comments! Where can we get TV coverage where the commentators, and interviewers have any intelligence or sense of history? Makes me want to SCREEEEEEEEAAAM!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommentatorIdiots Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: CommentatorIdiots Posted by: CJC
» RE: CommentatorIdiots Posted by: TiredoftheLies
» RE: CommentatorIdiots Posted by: peacefullaim
Sad
Posted by: RobNLA on Jan 30, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media never gave Edwards a fair chance. He was doing well then the mass media decided to attack him on how much he spent on a hair cut. Basically he was hit hard and early to prevent him from even gaining momentum in the race.
Even so, he had a lot of supporters, but the media kept ignoring his campaign. And in debates anyone but Obama or Clinton kept being ignored.
He was the last candidate that at least had some substance. I'm not sure if I could vote for Obama and I certainly will never ever vote for Clinton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sad Posted by: Vik
» RE: Sad Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Sad Posted by: Vik
» RE: Sad Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Sad Posted by: EdinIowa
How ridiculous...
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 30, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that I've heard all these people saying how sad it is that Edwards is gone now. So my question is... why didn't more people vote for him??? Those who have already had their primaries or caucuses should be ashamed if they didn't vote for him but are complaining today.

In this country, we deserve the government we get if we don't get involved and support those who really could make a difference in this country. We've never needed a progressive more than we do today, and now the only candidate worth that moniker is gone.

I'm still shopping for a new country! I got a feeling I'm gonna need it come November, no matter who wins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How ridiculous... Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: How ridiculous... Posted by: Quannah
» RE: How ridiculous... Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: How ridiculous... Posted by: peacefullaim
I never thought I would say this
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 30, 2008 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I am really pissed off at John Edwards. I can't imagine why he had to pull out of the race so close to super tuesday. All the news outlets are now talking about how popular he is in the southern states and that he was still firmly in the running. How could his own campaign deliver a vote of no confidence?

Unless it is because of Elizabeth's health I don't think he should have left all of his many supporters in the dust like this.

Before people start throwing tomatoes please be compassionate, I am simply going through the stages of heartbreak. Anger. Denial. You get the picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Damn it!
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Jan 30, 2008 9:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now all we're left with is Clinton(s) and her/their power-hungry, corporate-kissing, same-as-it-ever-was bullshit and Obama's Chicago-Democratic-sleaze-machine ladder-climbing charm. Wonder-f***ing-ful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

is it possible...
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Jan 30, 2008 9:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that he was worrying about "taking votes" from Obama? Is that what he's thinking? Although he was my choice after Dennis, lately I have been thinking that if he wasn't in the race, Obama would easily be blowing Hillary out of the water. Could throwing his support behind the lesser of the other two evils be what Edwards is up to? I have a feeling he'll endorse Obama before long, with hopes of being appointed Attorney General.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can there be any more doubt
Posted by: Shey on Jan 30, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....... that it's no longer possible to make a serious tun for president in this country without selling out to mega-corporation lobbyists?
Why don't the so-called candidates just step aside and officially turn the reigns of the country over to the Health Insurance industry, the Pharmaceutical Industry, the mega-corporations that control virtually all media, etc?
This is a sad day for this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some advising
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Jan 31, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you want some advice?

First- Press your legislators to forbid the owning of mass media by other corporations or conglomerates, and make it a 20 years prison felony

Second- Forbid lobbying, like the active corruption it is, and make it a 20 years prison felony.

Third- Get your public prosecutors under complete sctrutiny by all the agencies you can get, to monitorize their work on the above cited felonies, and make the absence of action by them a 20 yers prison felony.

Fourth- If your legislators, public prosecutors and correspondent audition agencies betray you (one more time) on that issue, put your own lifes at stake and make a revolution, like george washington did.

I doubt you will follow my advice, and I pity you for that, but anyway I had to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]