Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Americans Demand Change, The State of the Union Address Is More of The Same

Posted by Andrea Batista Schlesinger, Drum Major Institute at 7:20 AM on January 29, 2008.


This year the President labored to keep breathing life into the same worn out ideology that has repeatedly failed America's middle class.
Andrea Batista Schlesinger responds to 2008 State of Union

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

DMI's Rapid Response to the 2008 State of the Union

Click here to read DMI's full analysis of the President's domestic policy prescriptions - complete with statistics and talking points -- online at www.drummajorinstitute.org/sotu2008

The American people want change. Every Presidential candidate, Democrat and Republican, has made this a mantra. But the State of the Union Address reveals no alteration from President George W. Bush. This year the President labored to keep breathing life into the same worn out ideology that has repeatedly failed America's current and aspiring middle class.

The President continues to proclaim the foundation of our economy sound when so many current and aspiring middle-class Americans are losing their spot in the American Dream. He prioritizes ideology over proven methods of stimulating the economy and providing health care. He uses the language of consumer choice to dress up what really amounts to unbridled corporate power and profiteering. He continues to assert that the market will right itself, if only people understand it more and restrict it less, despite all of the evidence to the contrary.

Despite the praise-worthy components of President Bush's address tonight - his signing of the Energy Independence and Security Act, his cooperation with Congress to pass a stimulus reform that would include millions of low-income Americans he initially intended to exclude, his newfound interest in supporting military families - his approach reflected a commitment to ideology, as opposed to willingness to see how that ideology has actually impacted current and aspiring middle-class Americans.

After years of insisting that the economy was doing great as middle-class families were squeezed by stagnant wages and a rising cost of living, it takes weak corporate profits to make the President recognize that times are tough.

* Because the President's ideology insists that tax cuts are always preferable to government spending, the stimulus proposal includes costly and ineffective incentives for business rather than a fast and efficient expansion of unemployment benefits that would both boost the economy and help the middle-class households hardest hit by the downturn.

* Looking at the corporate recklessness and lack of government oversight that created the subprime mortgage crisis, President Bush avoids regulating the industries at fault. Rather he touts a plan that allows banks to decide on a purely voluntary basis whether they care to work out a payment plan with beleaguered homeowners. We don't imagine that's the kind of volunteerism he heralded elsewhere in his address.

* A middle-class standard of living is defined by things like access to education, health coverage and the opportunity to hold down a stable, well-paid job, yet from education to health care to tax policy, the President preferred to experiment with market-based solutions that won't help aspiring Americans work their way into the middle class. It was particularly shocking that the President urges Congress to make his failed tax cuts for the wealthy permanent, despite their failure to help the nation recover from the last economic downturn.

The President tells us that he trusts the American people. The more important question is whether the American people have any reason to trust the White House. The President's support of choice in this State of the Union address reveals that he is choosing not to heed the call of the American people for common-sense solutions to the challenges they face.

Yet, what is most important this address, is not the President delivering it, but the ideas represented. This State of the Union can either serve as a blueprint for continuing to move backwards, or a line of demarcation away from a policy outlook that has caused irreparable harm to America's middle class. While the President's years of imposing dangerously flawed policies on the nation are drawing to a close, future leaders, in Congress and the White House, will determine whether his distorted worldview lives on, and continues to afflict the middle class and the nation.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, economy, health care, taxes

Andrea Batista Schlesinger is the Executive Director of the Drum Major Institute.


WaPo, LA Times: Immigration Enforcement Is Not Working
From the east coast to the west coast reporters are covering America's dysfunctional immigration enforcement policies.
Post by Diego Graglia. October 7, 2008.
Independent Exit Pollsters in Swing States Seek Volunteers
An independent effort led by noted academics is planning exit polls in Ohio, Missouri and Pennsylvania to verify the official vote count.
Post by Steven Freeman. October 7, 2008.
Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Last One...
Posted by: Religious_Institute on Jan 29, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll leave it to others to comment on the rosy picture put on the war, the economy, no child left behind and others. The President, unlike past year's, did not mention either abortion or gay marriage. The possibilities of adult stem cell research brought loud applause, and the entire chamber rose when he called for a ban on human cloning. (But really -- is anyone advocating human cloning??) Any mention of supporting the troops brought sustained applause, but I couldn't help wonder why none of the uniformed servicepeople in the audience were women -- surely someone in the White House knows about gender diversity.

1-20-09 is less than a year away. I can't wait to celebrate.

Rev. Debra Haffner
http://www.debrahaffner.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republican Fiscal Responsibility
Posted by: JSquercia on Jan 29, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer to any question , on any topic and at any time is according to Republican's Tax Cuts .
Most especially those aimed at the most productive among us according to them . These people are being penalized for their success by having to pay the outrageous marginal Tax Rate of 35% . Guys we are WAR , as you so constantly remind us and during WWII the comparable tax rate was over 90% . They ignore the fact that we have never before CUT taxes during a war .
It is not enough that they reward the productive top bracket people . They are slavish devoted to the idea that Unearned Income is overtaxed at 15% . They claim this is a reward for the risk taking of Investors .
What they NEVER mention is that when those risk takers LOSE money they get to write it off. Of course this doesn't work unless you own the losing stocks individually . If it should be in your 401-K well too bad . They claim that these investors create jobs but lately that hasn't been the case unless you consider the jobs they have created in China .
Of all the abuses of the Capital Gains rate NONE is more flagrant than the idea that the BILLIONS that Hedge Fund Managers receive for their Compensation is treated as Capital Gains and thus receives that 15% rate . A rate which Warren Buffet pointed out exceeds that paid by their Secretaries whose compensation is considered Earned Income .
Bush had the audacity to talk about the goal of a Balanced Budger by 2012 and yet has NEVER
balanced the Budget not to mention squandering the surplus handed to him . In addition he keeps much of the funding for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan off budget and requests Emergeny Funding for them . So in realty the deficit is far worse than claimed .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublican Fiscal Responsibility Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
SMH
Posted by: Joe on Jan 29, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have European Union countries and China restricting less of their economy resulting in a growing economy but people here want to put more restrictions/regulations on the economy.

A job will do more to get a person out of poverty than a government check, charity or a bleeding heart liberal or socialist.

You know who doesn't care about people. A person that supports big government socialist regulations causing a job that would lift a person out of poverty to leave and go elsewhere.



The only part of Bush speech i agreed with was the beginning economic part....the rest (the part with the social pandering to liberals and conservatives) i completely disagreed with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SMH Posted by: OldRedleg
» RE: SMH Posted by: Joe
Did I not know better
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 29, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would have thought that we were in a time warp. Same ol' same ol. This guy has one schtick. We still have much to fear from Iran and by golly they better "come clean" about their nuclear program, forget that his own Intelligence says there is none. Then we have the wretched Congress not doing what The Texas Turd wants it to do at the minute he wants it done.
I just heard that he is asking for another $70 billion dollars for the wars and this great stimulus package will not include those on social security. So much for the seniors buying a prescription for one week's worth or so. There are other points too numerous to mention here but if the republicans are wondering why people will even vote for Hillary if they absolutely have to. just go replay that 7th abomination of a speech. Go figure

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Has he EVER asked unabashedly Posted by: magiquarian1969
"North American Summit between U.S., Canada, and Mexico in New Orleans this year..."
Posted by: Thetorganization on Jan 29, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone else catch this comment during last night's state of the union?

I couldn't be the only one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mary Landrieu Posted by: blackie4aces
Fact Checking the Imbecile
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Jan 29, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's a Washington Post fact checking article. Pretty good.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content
/article/2008/01/28/AR2008012803175.html?nav=hcmodule

Didn't the US just have a Pan American meeting in August of 2007 ? Messed up news??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More of the same alternate reality
Posted by: outlander55 on Jan 29, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know what reality the President lives in, but it is not the reality most Americans face every day.
Too save us from a recession, the Idiot in Chief wants to give us tax rebates. Since our national debt is at an historical high, that means he will borrow more money from China. Then, he wants us to spend it on consumer goods. Most of those goods will come from; you guessed it, China. Who's economy will this help? Certainly, not ours.
The only thing King George cares about is the corporate interests that pull his strings. Greed and power are the only things he will adhere to. Did you see the smirk on Darth Cheney's face while Bush rambled on about Iran and FISA? These morons are sinking America deeper and deeper into financial ruin and are laughing about it behind closed doors. But, impeachment is still not on the table. These men are traitors to the Constitution, but Congress sits on its' collective thumbs and does nothing to save our country. This makes then complicit in the crimes against America and its' Constitution. It is time that the citizens of this country wake up and smell the coffee. In France, the people riot in the streets over cheese and in America, the people sit on their fat asses and let the corporations bilk them for every dollar they can.
Then, the most moronic President in history gets up there and says "everything is just fine" and the media doesn't even bat an eye. The top story doesn't even come close to wondering about the Presidents alternate reality.
Folks, our government is beyond broken. It may be like the proverbial 1963 Rambler; beyond repair and time to get a new one.

Good night and good luck....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What fiscal responsibilty?
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Jan 29, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bu$h just talked about fiscal responsibility after years of repukes spend spend spend policies. Even in his last year he refuses to throw a bone to the struggling poor in this country. There are millions in this country who live on social security and disability who will receive nothing. These are people who could use it most. Not once in this administration have we seen any compassion. Oh, I'm sorry, struggling billionaires have had plenty of help.
Just one more year. Can we make it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Retread.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 29, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These State of the Union addresses tend to be full of empty rhetoric, bombast and hot air, and only have value insofar as they establish intent for future action by the president.

This latest one, however, THANK GOD the last one of this nightmare administration, was the most out-of-touch, delusional display of recycled worthless and disproven ideas that I have seen – and I've seen a lot of them. Bush might as well have dropped a recorder on the lectern playing cut-together exerpts from his past attempts to speak the English language in public, propped up a cardboard picture of his smirking self, and then left the room.

What amazed me, though, as I watched the "speech" through the fourth glass of wine I needed for fortification, was how enthusiastic were the Senators and Representatives in the audience. I can understand that most of the Lemming Republicans would "here, here!" and clap-clap; but the Democrats too? They didn't stand up, but they did applaud every one of his "points," no matter how stupid or meaningless. It was as if the outrages of the last seven years have had no affect on them at all. I was expecting at least a good number, Democrats and Republicans, to sit on their hands during the address last night; but all they proved to me was that Congress is, no matter how they try to snow us, one big exclusive club, out of touch with, and dismissive of, the people they are supposed to serve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: President Retread. Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: President Retread. Posted by: blitzmesser
Had enough? Let Sibel's little flame BURN!
Posted by: rockpicker on Jan 29, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com/

You wouldn't be reading this if you didn't hold out some hope we can still turn things around.

"Row on row, with hand
in trembling hand,
it's come to this;
we dreamers need to stand!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]