Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why the Kennedy Endorsement Matters

Posted by GottaLaff , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 5:06 AM on January 28, 2008.


Also, Toni Morrison, who dubbed Bill Clinton the "first Black President," backs Obama.
Obama at Kennedy endorsement

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This election holds special meaning for so many:

Rejecting a personal entreaty from President Bill Clinton, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) plans to endorse Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) for president in a joint appearance on Monday, Democratic sources said.

Did you know there was a personal entreaty from Bill Clinton? I didn't. Here's how the endorsement helps Obama:

Democrats said the endorsement will help Obama with traditional Democratic groups where Clinton has been strong -- union households, Hispanics and downscale workers.

Also, the nod by the most experienced member of the Senate adds significant standing to Obama, who is working to prove he has the experience necessary to be president.

And here's how it hurts the Clintons:

The announcement stunned Senate colleagues, who had expected Kennedy to remain neutral until the increasingly vitriolic nominating contest with Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) settled out.

"This is the biggest Democratic endorsement Obama could possibly get short of Bill Clinton," said a high-level Democrat.

Here's how much it mattered to the Clintons:

The Clinton campaign launched a last-ditch effort over the last few days to stop Kennedy's move, orchestrating a flood of phone calls to Kennedy from sources ranging from union chiefs to his Massachusetts constituents.

The former president also called Kennedy in a vain attempt to keep him out of the race, a source familiar with the conversation said.

And here's why it hurt the Clintons:

During his two terms in the White House, President Clinton made repeated overtures to the Kennedy family. So the senator's rejection of his wife is at least as embarrassing as her 28-point loss in the South Carolina primary on Saturday.

And finally, here's what it meant to some who were close to the Kennedy brothers:

Old hands to President Kennedy and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy came out for Obama, in part because he reminded them of the charismatic brothers. One of the former advisers, Harris Wofford, said Obama "touches my soul."

"For me, no one has done that since John, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King," Wofford said in December. "I waited a long time to have that feeling."

Some other Kennedy family members do support Hillary.

This has to be tough all around. It's obviously a very emotional issue for a lot of people, for good reason.

For so many, this election really hits home. And that can hurt.

UPDATE: Toni Morrison, who famously dubbed Bill Clinton the nation's "first black president", endorses Obama

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, kennedy, morrison

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Obama Expands on Economic Plan, Emphasizes 'J-O-B-S'
Obama struck an optimistic yet pragmatic tone in a policy speech on the economy today.
Post by Steve Benen. October 13, 2008.
McCain Makes the Case Against Himself
Next President "won’t have the luxury of studying up on the issues."
Post by Faiz Shakir. October 13, 2008.
TONIGHT: Incredible Iraq Documentary 'Section 60'
Filmmakers Jon Alpert and Matthew O'Neill's latest doc will air tonight on HBO at 9pm (EST).
Post by Staff. October 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Change?
Posted by: jim_altman on Jan 28, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The candidate of change is endorsed by Kerry and Kennedy who represent a combined eighty years of the way Democrats have always done it before. The candidate of change is indiscernable in the substance of his rhetoric from the Kristols, Krauthammers, and Bushies of neocondom. How is this a good thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Neocondom Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Cynthia McKinney Posted by: Julian
Kennedy's endorsement, like Kerry's, is a one day news item
Posted by: NotNeoCon on Jan 28, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Obama wishes to get the nomination, he will need help from other political groups than the liberal Democrats. Kennedy will turn more non-liberals off than he will bring into Obama's camp. And Kerry - he's a major looser and the occupier of the White House is great proof that he (Kerry) is worthless, especially in the endorsement business!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REMEMBERING KENNEDY AND MARY JO
Posted by: bbfmail on Jan 28, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ted Kennedy's car went off a bridge and into a pond after a party for Bobby Kennedy's campaign staff on Chappaquiddick Island near Martha's Vineyard. A passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne (Ko-peck-nee) was subsequently found drowned in the car.

Kennedy claimed he dove repeatedly into the dark water but couldn't find her. Then, disoriented and hurt, he gave up. On it's face, a routine if terrible tragedy. But Kennedy and his handlers inexplicably waited 9 hours before reporting the accident.

The media frenzy was ferocious. There were claims Kennedy was drunk and that he and his staff engaged in a massive cover-up of the accident and the cause of Ms. Kopechne's death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Water under the Bridge Posted by: jim_altman
"the first black president"?
Posted by: MobileSucks on Jan 28, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does Toni Morrison still believe this ridiculous drivel? How was Mr. Clinton black? How is a person "black"?

Cause of how evil Republican crackers like that Grade-A Son-of-A-Bitch Newt Gingrich and Kenneth Starr (-who should be run over by an 18 wheeler truck, or thrown off a tall building) went after him like they did? That's to say, Clinton was, in the perceptions of black Americans, being treated by white establishment honkies as if he were black? That's defining "black" in terms of how one is being (mis)treated by powerful white people.

Is it because of Bill's communication style, his public persona, which of coarse is now tied in ways to his public humiliation that was the Lewinsky scandal? He appeared on Arsenio Hall and played the Sax. And Bill just knew how to speak their language, to talk to them in a way they could appreciate. So, he's black because he can act "black" and because they like him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The royal "we"
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 28, 2008 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I gotta laugh at the way no one is even pretending anymore that Bill isn't running for president...

In this article it's the Clintons this and the Clintons that... ha ha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The royal "we" Posted by: TZ
» RE: The royal "we" maybe you! Posted by: niliadis
good speech, but...
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Jan 28, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i still want more. i'm not surprised by the touchstone of kennedy being added to the rhetoric, and there are similarities, but seriously now, i want to know what change is gonna come.

i'm hearing criticism, which i always listen to, and i have heard no reply. i want to know why he supported the patriot act, i want to know why he endorsed AIPAC, and i want to know clearly what he want to do, because these two facts do not point to changing history, they point to the status quo he accuses hillary of being.

i want to believe in Barack Obama, but i am so tired of the gingoistic iconography (kennedy) and speeches (kinda a "I have a Dream" without substance), and i need substance.

i wish for America a strong leader that will allow it to realize the american dream (the real one, not the perverted one), and with Barak i can see a shadow of this, but only so faint, without any detail beyond rhetoric.

the AIPAC photo op and the vote for the patriot act seem to carry an odor for me... maybe someone can set me straight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good speech, but... Posted by: Doubtom
Why endorse Obama when he is not perfect?
Posted by: herbal on Jan 28, 2008 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real Hillary Clinton gets exposure here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvuzMWcz0kU

Then see the company she keeps with Rev, Hagee of Christian Zionist cult here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exdsB5D1r7Y

She advocates nuclear war against Iran and has never repudiated war in any form. Please prove me wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» dicotomy Posted by: andrewstromotich
» RE: dicotomy Posted by: herbal
dicotomy
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Jan 28, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the post i did above, i forgot to mention bill was also there giving speeches at the AIPAC pow wow, but lets then see that Barak also runs with this position, as seen with the patriot act yeas he gave.

so then what do we have? Similar characters. What is different? Their Rhetoric. so lets listen to the rhetoric, which of course is the dreamy side of politics.

change change, new future, new history is the Barak rhetoric, and if we accept from the above examples, the Barak runs with this old school, what is true?

what is hillary's rhetoric?

experience experience, 8 years of pushing the US in a different direction. not new new, similar to the 90's but with way more saavy on how to achieve. and who knows, maybe she could ask gore to help?

that is why for me after realising that these two leaders are from an old school, i see more hope of real change with hillary.

again, show me that i am wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dicotomy Posted by: niliadis
Inspiring!
Posted by: kyer on Jan 28, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really enjoyed watching Obama's speech before Ted Kennedy endorsed him.
He is such a solid and inspiring speaker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inspiring! Posted by: niliadis
I'll tell you why this matters to the election of
Posted by: niliadis on Jan 28, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It matters Very much!!! It is showing how he left a poor girl to drown and manipulated the results with Money!! This is how he will be manipulating the media and the people that do not remember how people get away with murder and rape!
This is the person that people think the endorsement is a great thing.Money Money Money
In the meantime what do the Kennedys care, they have all the money in the world so a further drop in the economy is abscent from their minds and the middle class will be left with Mr. Obama! At least we know that when Bill was president we had the best economy ever and this is a fact..We need to think and vote for who will change our lives and who will to bring the economy to a surplus so that us little people can go back to the joy of living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary, the Voice of Experience
Posted by: herbal on Jan 28, 2008 11:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is Ralph Nader's account of the Bill Clinton performance. With experience like this, Hillary is bragging?.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/25/6641/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who's nader?
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Jan 29, 2008 12:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
u mean that maglomaniac that destroyed his own movement because his ego couldn't allow for any other leadership other than his own?

again, for me, the 90's were the best years of american leadership in the last 30 no doubt.

no it wasn't perfect, but it was the best leadership america had in over 30 years, and i would be glad to see a return to that era, which of course could be improved upon if america was mature enough to allow it to happen, instead of bowing yet again to the cult of personality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOG @ TROUGH
Posted by: willyd1962 on Feb 4, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ken is just another hog at the trough. He is a FAT BUTTED, D_R_U_N_K!!!! Look at him. Take away the money he would live under a bridge with a bottle of mD 20/20!! What a waste of skin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]