Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Facebook Bans Union Organizer for Making Too Many Friends

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 1:12 PM on January 24, 2008.


CUPE organizer/Labour Start correspondent Derek Blackadder's foray into labor-related social networking was rudely interrupted.
blackadder
Blackladder

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A Canadian union organizer has been banned from Facebook for making too many friends.

CUPE organizer/Labour Start correspondent Derek Blackadder's foray into labor-related social networking was rudely interrupted by a warning from Facebook saying that he was making too many friends. Blackadder ignored the warning.

John of jonninit explains:

Derek got a note from the good book, telling him he was trying to add too many friends, and should calm down a bit, or else. Now as a union organiser, he's quite likely to want to add lots of friends - it's kind of what he does. So he waits a bit and tries again, and is told he can't add any more at the moment and to wait and try later. Fair enough. He waits a bit more and tries again, same message. By now, he's probably frothing at the mouth and muttering "must organise, must organise", so he has another go to see if the coast is clear, and promptly gets himself a ban.

That being a ban from Facebook itself - no more profile, no access to the stuff he's built up, no appeal.

It's not clear exactly how many people Blackadder "friended" during his online organizing stint, or how quickly he racked up the contacts.

So far, nobody is alleging that the ban was politically motivated. The Facebook Terms of Use stipulate that Facebook is for personal non-commercial use only-that line is blurry for people like Blackadder who effectively make friends for a living. Besides which, work-related networking is one of the main reasons people use Facebook in the first place. Almost every Facebook user I know uses it to keep track of clients, colleagues, sources, political allies, and so on.

In fact, Facebook is full of professional activists and organizers plying their trade openly. These organizers come from across the political spectrum. Facebook hosts thousands of politically-oriented groups. It seems odd that Blackadder would be singled out for the content of his profile.

Apparently, it's not uncommon for users to get banned for adding too many friends.

The tech blog Scobelizer reported last year that Facebook engineers imposed a 5000-friend limit on all users because the system isn't designed to handle such large sets of contacts.

Still, the question remains: Why did Facebook kick Blackadder out, instead of just regulating his friending? By disabling the account, Facebook has deprived Blackadder of a potentially valuable contact lists and whatever else he may have uploaded.

Blackadder and his many friends are taking the ban in stride. Naturally, they've started a Blackadder solidarity Facebook group. As of one o'clock this afternoon, over 600 people have joined the group to lobby for Blackadder's reinstatement.

I guess it's sort of backhanded compliment for an organizer to be too connected for Facebook.

Digg!

Tagged as: facebook, internet, blackladder, unions, labor

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Election Activists Win Three Key Battles
In Missouri, Arizona and Washington, D.C., voting rights advocates block and remove barriers to voting.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. May 16, 2008.
Republicans Are Hoping That Democrats Will Win - Then Fail
Why Republicans are OK with losing in 2008.
Post by Digby. May 16, 2008.
Wages of Sin, We Keep Paying
The Bush Administration is learning that we reap what we sow in Iraq.
Post by Spencer Ackerman. May 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The more I learn about facebook
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jan 25, 2008 12:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the less I like it. I was just about to join when the last bunch of crap hit the fan. I don't think so.

I don't want em spying on me or using me for their marketing.

For the time being, I can live without it..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why was he banned?
Posted by: AndyF on Jan 25, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is coming from someone who doesn't use the product and can't quite see the point of it, although at least one of my kids uses it college. Maybe he was banned because he ignored the host's request to stop adding "friends" not once, but four times. To me, this is akin to someone at a bar ordering a drink, he is told he has had enough, so he orders again, he is again told he has had enough, so he tries again, again he is told that he has had enough, convinced that the bartender just doesn't understand, he tries to order for a fourth time, whereupon the bartender realizes the guy just won't give up so he kicks the person out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy in a privatized world
Posted by: LLITTL on Jan 25, 2008 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, this is just another example of why we need truely public space online. Free speech is only a right in public. Anytime you are on private property, you are subject to the whims of the owners. There's no free speech at work, there's no free speech in the parking lot of a major corporation's headquarters, and no free speech protection on a website owned and controlled by some commercial interest.
As a customer of my ISP I am granted 10 mb of space for email. In this age of video mail, that is a rediculously small amount of space. I had to stop pointing my Yahoo group emails to that mailbox because it was filling up faster than I could download. This amount of space would make sense to me if I were an employee of the company. No appeal, no way to increase it. Its as if I'm actually considered the same as a worker.
This is the hidden danger of privitization. If we make every place private property, we won't have a patch of ground, real or virtual, on which to stand and work for change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy in a privatized world Posted by: Raleigh Myers
ironic, huh?
Posted by: leftytomato on Jan 25, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't lose sight of the irony that Facebook will cannibalize its own files for commercial purposes, but won't allow someone else to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

self-regulation
Posted by: pminnitte on Jan 25, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as a user of facebook (often) and myspace (occasionally), it's pretty clear to me that facebook is just trying to avoid a problem i've noticed a lot on myspace: fake profiles of trashy girls, which try to accumulate a ton of friends, only to coax them into signing up for some porn. i wouldn't be surprised if this were a self-regulatory mechanism built into the facebook site that requires no human intervention whatsoever. DB probably just mimicked the behavior of myspace-like smut mongers, triggering an automatic ban.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demokracy online too, eh!
Posted by: neilemac on Jan 26, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Limited democracy, how Orwellian; I can see that Dennis Kucinich is not alone in the disparity of the political process in America ...it's even on Facebook. Told you it was 'big brother'...
Adieu Facebook, Bye bye now, bye bye...

I found the site to be an intrusive invasion of private information [big brother]; now I get the feeling that there's a wicked amount of cyber-incest going on. Posters there are screwed out of their privacy while ownership of their material becomes the property of the Facebook domain. It's beyond Orwellian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Victory! Facebook reverses decision
Posted by: PeaceLove on Jan 26, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facebook has backed down and reinstated his account.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Facebook 'company' investors????
Posted by: Raleigh Myers on Jan 28, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There seems to be an in your face company in there. http://tinyurl.com/yt2keh

The first venture capital money to come into TheFacebook, $500,000 worth, came from venture capitalist Peter Thiel, founder and former CEO of Paypal. [1] A Stanford graduate and former columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Thiel is author of the book "The Diversity Myth," [2] which received praises from notable neo-conservatives such as William Kristol. [3] In fact, Thiel is on the board of the radical conservative group VanguardPAC. [4]

Further funding came in the form of $12.7 million from venture capital firm Accel Partners. Accel's manager James Breyer was former chair of the National Venture Capital Association (NVAC). [1] Breyer served on NVAC's board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, [5] a venture capital firm established by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1999. [6] This firm works in various aspects of information technology and intelligence, including most notably "nurturing data mining technologies."

Breyer has also served on the board of BBN Technologies, a research and development firm known for spearheading the ARPANET, or what we know today as the Internet. [7] In October of 2004, Dr. Anita Jones climbed on board, becoming a part of a firm packed with leaders from other areas of Silicon Valley's venture capital community, including none other than Gilman Louie. But what is most interesting is Dr. Jones' experience prior to joining BBN.
copy and paste http://tinyurl.com/yt2keh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re Facebook
Posted by: redstarwraith on Jan 28, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I use facebook rather a lot. I got banned from them once for sending too many emails. I wrote to them several times, complaining i was using their service exactly as they advertise it, "As a social utility tool to keep in touch with friends, etc.," Nothing. One day, i logged in again and my account was mysteriously activated. It's possible facebook dicked this guy over intentionally, but much MORE likely he exceeded some quota meant to keep people from spamming or flaming or selling or whatever the hell...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

2nd deleted Facebook profile.
Posted by: scott_0311 on Jan 29, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First time my profile was deleted,which was sometime last year, it was because of too many friend request.

Recently, it has been deleted due to sending/recieving too many messages.

Unfortunately, neither of which has been reinstated.

Should I just create a new page and start all over again? Or fight to have my profiles operative once again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]