Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sen. Boxer Slams EPA Administrator for Redacting Documents With Duct Tape

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 11:08 AM on January 24, 2008.


"This is information the people deserve to have. And this is not the way we should run the greatest government in the world," said Boxer.
Boxer Chastises EPA Administrator For Redacting Documents With Duct Tape: ‘I’m Worked Up’

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In December, EPA administrator Stephen Johnson rejected "California's long-standing request for a waiver from federal law to be able to implement its own landmark regulations to slash greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles."

Today, Johnson came under harsh criticism from Environment and Public Works Committee chairwoman Barbara Boxer. She blasted Johnson for refusing come to California and meet with residents, and for censoring documents with white duct tape on the EPA's decision-making process:

Colleagues, this is the tape, this is the tape that was put over -- finally the administration had a way to use duct tape. This administration, this is what they did to us. They put this white tape over the documents and staff had to stand here. It's just unbelievable. [...]

I mean what a waste of our time. This isn't national security. This isn't classified information, colleagues. This is information the people deserve to have. And this is not the way we should run the greatest government in the world. It does not befit us. So that's why I'm worked up about it and think we have been treated in a very shabby way.

Yesterday, Boxer released excerpts from an October presentation, revealing that Johnson had ignored the advice of EPA staff who were in favor of granting California the waiver. The excerpts came out after Boxer's staff removed the duct tape from the documents and transcribed handwritten notes, under the supervision of EPA staffers.

As Boxer noted, after all this time, looks like the Bush administration finally found a use for its found some use for the duct tape.

Transcript:

BOXER: Well, since Sen. Inhofe went over about 30 seconds and I had 27 seconds left, I’m going to use the remainder of my time before I turn to colleagues to respond.

Let’s be clear. This is the first time a waiver has ever been denied outright 50 times. And I ask the administrator to please come. I asked him in friendship to please come to California, to please face the people who he had turned down and explain to them why. Gov. Schwarzenegger sent a representative there. The Attorney General was there. There were citizens there, colleagues. The fact is, Mr. Johnson refused to come.

So I said ok, you can’t come. Could you send someone else? No. No one else. Could you send documents if no person can come? No. There were no documents.

And in my — in all the years I have been around, I have not seen a committee treated this way. And Sen. Inhofe says that he was treated this way or the committee was by the Clinton administration. I can truly say that I don’t recall that, but if it was so, it was wrong then and it’s wrong now.

As I say, I think it’s important to put in the record that we asked him to come because we thought it would be a benefit to the people, because the people need to understand why this happened. I said before I’d show you the kind of lack of cooperation we had.

Colleagues, this is the tape, this is the tape that was put over — finally the administration had a way to use duct tape. This administration, this is what they did to us. They put this white tape over the documents and staff had to stand here. It’s just unbelievable. And pull off out of the sentences here.

I mean what a waste of our time. This isn’t national security. This isn’t classified information, colleagues. This is information the people deserve to have. And this is not the way we should run the greatest government in the world. It does not befit us. So that’s why I’m worked up about it and think we have been treated in a very shabby way.

I would call on Sen. Lieberman. Senator, we have four minutes.

Digg!

Tagged as: california, epa, boxer, carbon dioxide

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on Jan 24, 2008 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does Congress go through this charade? The only way to deal with the Bush Administration is to IMPEACH Bush and Cheney; everything else is an exercise in futility!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stupid cow
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Jan 24, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unless you, madam, are actually 'mad as hell and not going to take it anymore' you are no different than those you castigate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subpoena and hold in contempt.
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jan 25, 2008 12:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when you are ignored and HELD in contempt by those you have the power and responsibility to regulate, you have the right and responsibility to assert and enforce that power.

The responsibility is sacred and extends to generations unborn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What happened to subpoena powers?
Posted by: zipper696 on Jan 25, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has Congress become so cowed and emasculated that they DARE not use their very real powers?
I recall scenes not so long ago in the commitee chambers where those called before them quaked under harsh questioning.

I guess, taking their lead from The Decider it's a given that both Houses are owned by CheneyCorp and can be safely ignored (or if you get caught with your hand in the cookie jar you'll get a "Scooter Libby Sentence")

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put Up or Shut Up
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 25, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until the Democrats get some balls, (pardon me Barbara), I don't want to hear about their little aggravations about "not being treated nice." I have never seen such total lack of courage, conviction, and lack of will to follow the dictates of the American people as we have right now. What a bunch of marshmellows this entire Congress has turned out to be. They jump up and down, pretend to block and they holler but then follow exactly the path The Texas Turd chooses.

I say we need to entirely clean the House and the Senate and start all over again. Is that a remote possibility?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boxer delusions
Posted by: fearn on Jan 25, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And this is not the way we should run the greatest government in the world."
She's kidding, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Greatest Hypocrisy ...Maybe. Not Democracy
Posted by: neilemac on Jan 26, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracy is a farce in America, wake up and smell the coffee before all the beans are decimated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One little thing Senator:
Posted by: dougo on Jan 27, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are so upset dear senator do us all not a favor but your duty, and impeach the both of them. Like the proverbial bad apple,they're rotten to the core.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's How...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Jan 27, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to see that the evildoers now controlling the highest office in our land, receive their just deserts: hard time in a Federal pen.

The first step to that end is of course, impeachment for the both of them for the 935 lies that led to the Iraq war and invasion of that totally innocent (of 9/11 and most other things) country.

Then the trial--which (since they both lied like rugs) would absolutely lead to conviction for the both of them.

Problem: Dennis Kucinich filed impeachment papers against Cheney. What happened to sink those papers? In what committee have they been tabled? WHO TOOK THE VOTE TO TABLE THOSE PAPERS? WHO VOTED "AYE"???? NAMES, PLEASE!!

What I'm getting at is, SOMEONE is not letting those Impeachment papers get acted upon. SOMEONE(S) is bottling those vitally important (to America) impeachment papers up in some committee.

THAT'S SOMEONE WHO COMES UP FOR RE-ELECTION (OR ELECTION, this year. The people in their districts, need their names. We need them gone, too. All those who would protect these two anti-American* scumbags desecrating our White House, deserve a swift road home.

We need their names so--Republican or Democrat--we can vote to send them home this year. It's not just the Republicans who are defending these two pieces of scum--it's also Democrats, betraying both their country, their party, AND the people of these United States of America--all of whom (well most of us anyway) accept the Constitution of the United States of America, not as a piece of (used!) toilet paper, but as the law of our land.

ALTERNET: GIVE US THOSE NAMES of who bottled up Dennis Kucinich's impeachment bill, and in what committee. Devote one day a week to running those names, so that then we know, who to send home on Election Day. You must know who they are! A few of us don't, yet.

Rerun those names of Bush/Cheney enablers, some of us haven't seen them. That way, we can kick them out of our Congress and Senate...cause anyone who'd defend those two Turds, and keep them from meeting their just deserts, at the very least doesn't belong in Congress or the Senate, and at the most, should probably be standing the dock with them, as co-conspirators against America.

*Bush, upon being told that warrantless (and FISA-less) wiretaps were UNCONSTITUTIONAL: "What's the constitution, it's just a goddam piece of paper..." This from the CEO of America, whose Oath of Office MANDATES the protection and preservation of the Constitution of the United States of America "...against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC" (Caps mine). Since by his own words, Bush showed his contempt for the document that he's supposed to preserve and defend and indeed, has proven that he's the ENEMY of the Constitution of the United States of America: at the very least, Buckshot (Cheney) should have opened his mouth to object to this from his CEO. After all, Cheney swore the same oath. No matter--Dirty 5-deferment Dick was probably too busy cleaning his shotgun...and seeing who he could dragoon to accompany him on his next hunting trip*

*If Cheney had gone to Vietnam instead of being deferred FIVE TIMES--he might have at least, learned how to shoot! And learned how, when you take aim, you shoot at the quail you were hunting, instead of the lawyer with which you were hunting them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]