Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mitt Gets Pissed When Reporter Challenges His Lobbyist-Free Campaign Claims

Posted by Daniel DiRito, The All Spin Zone at 7:18 AM on January 18, 2008.


I hate to burst the candidate's bubble, but that seems to have been a "Mittrepresentation".
Romney vs AP reporter

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Mitt Romney has a propensity to finesse the facts. Yesterday, he had a confrontation with a reporter over his assertion that he doesn't have any lobbyists "running his campaign". I hate to burst the candidate's bubble, but that seems to have been a "Mittrepresentation".

I want to see Mitt Romney's dictionary. Given his frequent reliance on third tier definitions to justify his many inaccurate remarks, it has to be awfully ragged. In the following video, reporter Glen Johnson confronts Romney on his assertion that he doesn't have lobbyists running his campaign. Mitt attempts to nuance the definition of "running his campaign" with regards to Ron Kaufman, a Romney operative who is a well-known and well-connected lobbyist.

If this were the only incident of Romney mincing words, one might be inclined to disregard this latest episode. However, one would have to be blind to miss that the well-healed and carefully coifed candidate has done so on numerous occasions; not to mention the fact that he recently unveiled his umpteenth stump strategy as a non-establishment, change agent, Washington outsider. While the former governor is adept at covering his tracks, I suspect these tactics are wearing thin and appear far too coy for a number of voters.

I'm reminded of the GOP's frequent efforts to pejoratively peg Democratic candidates. They labeled John Kerry a "flip flopper" and they spent years attaching "Slick Willie" to President Clinton. With that in mind, I think its time to tag Romney with an appropriate alias.

A number of pundits have referred to Romney by his actual first name, Willard, and others have taken to calling the GOP candidate Mittens (think here kitty, kitty). Nonetheless, the existing choices just don't seem to capture Romney's political essence.

I think a concerted effort is warranted to help accurately identify and appropriately describe candidate Romney. In looking for a starting point, I couldn't help but recall Jon Lovitz' Saturday Night Live character, "Tommy Flanagan...The Pathological Liar".

Feel free to offer your suggestions in the comments and maybe we can start a list and have readers pick a favorite.

Also, don't hesitate to propose some new versions of existing words that define Romney's willingness to finesse the truth. The one that immediately came to mind is a "mittrepresentation"...which could easily be substituted for misrepresentation. Obviously, this would also work for misinformation, resulting in the word "mittinformation".

Digg!

Tagged as: lobbyists, romney

Daniel DiRito is a blogger of The All Spin Zone


Obama Expands on Economic Plan, Emphasizes 'J-O-B-S'
Obama struck an optimistic yet pragmatic tone in a policy speech on the economy today.
Post by Steve Benen. October 13, 2008.
McCain Makes the Case Against Himself
Next President "won’t have the luxury of studying up on the issues."
Post by Faiz Shakir. October 13, 2008.
TONIGHT: Incredible Iraq Documentary 'Section 60'
Filmmakers Jon Alpert and Matthew O'Neill's latest doc will air tonight on HBO at 9pm (EST).
Post by Staff. October 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
At the risk of the usual charges
Posted by: Thucy on Jan 18, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of "political correctness" or (heaven forfend!) "identity politics" I have to say I'm getting really weary reading comments such as "One would have to be blind...." not to see through Mitt's duplicity, or any other obvious fact or development this or that writer is trying to prove. I have quite a few blind friends who know Romney for what he is -- a lying politician -- while I suspect most Romney supporters have no discernable disability whatsoever.

It would be unacceptable for a progressive blogger to write: "One would have to be a stay at home mother" or "one would have to be a confirmed homosexual" or "one would have to be a person of color" to fall for this or that political trick. Why is it acceptable to write "one would have to be blind" and use a particular disability as a synomym for political obtusenss?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

proofreader, please?
Posted by: lexicon on Jan 18, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So...Romney is "well-healed"? Was he ill, at one point? I believe the term you're looking for is "well-heeled".

Slight difference. Not a typo either.

Can we PLEASE work to maintain the english language intact? I know, it's hard, what with all the bushisms and such. We're barraged with bad english, let's fight to keep it safe from the republican juggernaut!

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: proofreader, please? Posted by: SavageDissension
» RE: proofreader, please? Posted by: lexicon
Outaged
Posted by: JSquercia on Jan 18, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really got me outraged was the bit at the end where the Romney staffer told the guy Don't get argumentative with the canidate . Sounds like Mitt IS a WORTHY successor to Bush afterall . All opposition opinions will be shumted away into "free Speech Zones " and ONLY the TRUE believers will be allowed into
meetings

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outaged Posted by: herronsmith
Phoney baloney
Posted by: frank69 on Jan 18, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mitt" Romney = phoney baloney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]