Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Afro-Netizen
All Spin Zone
Altercation
Americablog
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Another Iranian Online
August J. Pollak
Baghdad Burning
Barry Lando
Bloggrrrlz Gallery
Blondesense
Bob Geiger
Body and Soul
Boing Boing
Booman Tribune
BOP News
Bush Watch
BUZZFLASH
Carpetbagger
Clean Air Blog
Cool Hunting
Corrente
CrooksandLiars
Cursor
Dahr Jamail
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
DC Media Girl
DemiOrator
Direland
Echidne of the Snakes
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton
Fact-esque
Falafel Sex, and Other Things Best Left Unsaid
Farai Chideya
Feminist Peace Network
Feministe
Feministing
Frameshop
Gristmill
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
James Wolcott
Jesus General
Lady Jayne's Blog
Liberal Oasis
Mad Kane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Media Girl
Media is a Plural
MediaCitizen
Metafilter
Michael Berube
MyDD
News Dissector
News For Real
Norbizness
Oliver Willis
Pacific Views
Pandagon
Political Animal
PopPolitics.com
PR Watch
Prometheus 6
Raed in the Middle
RH Reality Check
Robert Greenwald
Roger Ailes
Rox Populi
Sadly, No!
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeares Sister
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
SpeakSpeak
Stay Free!
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBogg
Thatcoloredfellasweblog
The Bilerico Project
The Hutchinson Political Report
The Republic of T
The Revealer
The Sideshow
The Swift Report
Think Progress
This Modern World
TikvahGirl
Trish Wilson
War and Piece
Waveflux
What She Said!
Whiskey Bar
Working Families Vote 2008
Historic Agreement Reached in Klamath Dam Controversy
The largest river restoration project in American history may become a reality.
Tribal, fishery, and environmental groups in California and Oregon's Klamath Basin have been trying for years to get a series of antiquated dams removed from the Klamath River -- but they've run into conflict from upstream irrigators used to getting cheap and plentiful water, and PacifiCorp, the dams' owner. (You can read more about that in my AlterNet story.)
The dams, which produce a minimal amount of electricity, were constructed in 1918 and have resulted in the loss of historic salmon runs, changes in water quality and safety of the river, and have devastated the economies of Native and fishing communities along the river and coast.
But, after over two years of talks, an alliance of 26 diverse stakeholders from the Basin has produced a draft agreement.
A representative from the Karuk tribe confirmed that: "the Klamath Settlement Group has produced a draft agreement to settle many of the key issues that have for years divided the Klamath Basin's diverse communities. ... The meetings producing the agreement were convened by the Yurok Tribe, Karuk Tribe, and Klamath Water Users Association.
According to Maria Tripp, Yurok Tribal Chair:
This is a historic moment for the Yurok people and all other Klamath Basin communities. For many generations, the Yurok people have witnessed a steady decline in the health of the river and the life that it sustains. Implementation of this agreement, coupled with removal of the four PacifiCorp dams from the Klamath River, turns the tide from degradation to restoration. These agreements will enable our children's children to have the same cultural experiences and memories of the river and fish that our families enjoyed a hundred years ago.
While this agreement has united long-arguing parties in the Basin, it still needs the help of PacifiCorp, the dams' owner to make it a reality. The company is a subsidiary of Mid-American Energy Holdings Company, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway.
And, according the Los Angeles Times, not everyone is happy with the settlement:
Two environmental groups and a Northern California tribe balked at the blueprint, calling it a Bush administration sellout to agribusiness allies. Clifford Lyle Marshall, chairman of the holdout Hoopa Valley Tribe, said the proposal favors farmers over the river's fish and labeled it "an Old West irrigation deal: guarantees for irrigators, empty promises for the Indians."
"The ironic thing is there's not even dam removal in this dam-removal deal," said Bob Hunter of WaterWatch of Oregon, one of the two dissenting environmental groups, both of which were excluded from the negotiations last year. "It seems they released it now because time is running out for the Bush administration to deliver to its political allies in the Klamath farm community."Given the political and environmental history of the Basin, it is not surprising that many parties feel a deal is inadequate, although for the vast majority of those in the area, it is hopeful. The next round of conflict is just weeks away when the alliance begins meetings with PacifiCorp. Stay tuned.
| Also in PEEK | |||
| After Conceding, Then Unconceding, Then Conceding, Then Unconceding, NY Conservative Concedes Doug Hoffman today issued a statement in which he admitted Bill Owens won the NY-23 special election. Post by Amanda Terkel. November 24, 2009. |
China on Reducing Its Carbon Footprint: Why Should We Have to? They've got a point. Per capita, China only produces 20 percent of America's carbon emissions. Post by Robert Dreyfuss. November 24, 2009. |
Supremes to Decide if Idle Rich's Scenic Ocean Views More Important than Public Beaches, the Environment A popular coastal reclamation program is being threatened by short-sighted scumbags. Post by Joshua Holland. November 24, 2009. |
|