Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Offers Saudis Tongue for Oil

Posted by Attaturk, Firedoglake at 4:20 AM on January 15, 2008.


It's always Munich 1938 for Bush and his kind and they are always Churchill and the rest of us are always Chamberlain.
9a5bcbd2f9c442d3ac7ba5d556a80998
BUSH and Saudi King

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

While CNN this morning has a headline implying that Bush is offering tongue to the Saudi King to get oil prices down, there is one other historical piece of illogic that has too often shaped U.S. foreign policy and is clearly winning what little mind George Bush has.

It's always Munich 1938 for Bush and his kind and they are always Churchill and the rest of us are always Chamberlain. Someone else, whatever the convenient target is, is Hitler.

For years, it was the Soviets. And though they had their own criminalities they could be excoriated with, it was easy to call anyone in favor of dealing with them as an "Appeaser"; then it was Mao; then it was Ho Chi Minh; Castro; Khomeini and Iran; the Sandinistas; Saddam; Chavez; and now it is back to Iran again. So many faux Hitlers so little facts.

Poor Chamberlain, let his foolish ghost rest in peace, and stop making the most powerful country on earth, the U.S., into the Sudetenland.

But time after time the rhetoric goes there. And again on his latest awkward trip overseas, the alleged history major Bush and his black and white, pop history, version of the world came on full bore and should scare us shitless.

There are two key moments when this incredibly insipid and dangerous predeliction was exposed and I am hardly the first one to note it.

First, Bush brings up the thought to Condi Rice "we should have bombed Auschwitz" as if this thought never occurred and was never debated at during the Second World War. There are, of course, a myriad number of reasons this did not occur, from the fact it would be ineffective -- the Germans weren't above killing people in mass shootings (Baba Yar ring a bell?) to the fact it would have been incredibly difficult for much of the war to pull off. Whether it was the camp itself or railways such bombing by B-24s or B-17s would have been quite difficult, risky, and likely ineffective. It is a debate that has been engaged in countless times, but ultimately in the manner in which Bush made it, comes down as an accusation at Franklin Roosevelt and the usually sainted Churchill (or even Eisenhower) who as war leaders Bush is a tragically laughable shadow.

Second, Bush's even more worrisome and bizarre statement to Ehud Olmert (who is even less popular in Israel than Bush is here) that the President of the United States is disowning his own intelligence services for that of Israel's because the latter gives him the Iranian intelligence he WANTS to believe -- that Iran equals Nazi Germany 1938 (or in Jonah Goldberg's World: Berkeley, California 2008).

Added together, with just over one year left in his presidency, with the moronic yelps of how "victory" has been achieved in Iraq (victory apparently then takes at least a decade off), one starts to realize that Bush has resurrecting Chamberlain's ghost one more time and Iran is the Rail Depot to Auschwitz of his fevered dreams.

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, bush, middle east, saudi arabia, rice, nazi germany, world war 2

Attaturk is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Joseph6Pack
Posted by: Fairplay on Jan 15, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately Bush is not the only simple-minded American living in a past that they still don't understand. They want to talk about Anne Frank hiding out but will not allow discussion of Rachel Corey , the martyr for Middle East Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deb
Posted by: debmcd on Jan 15, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about cherry picking intellegence. It's one thing to cherry pick US intelligence but now he is going to other countries to get his intelligence? Trying to get other countries into another war...isn't that an impeachable offence? If not it should be. He wants a war so bad, he's shopping for an army overseas. This guy is such an idiot. His mom really should have thought about ending the pregnancy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NIE
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jan 15, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the word "moron" come up a lot when bush is mentioned? Your president is a moron,criminal,ignorant and proud of it. I only hope his future is a nightmare of the grandest proportions, but I doubt it, because never has the saying "ignornace is bliss" been more appropriate. I do know that it will take 30 years to remove this country from the damage he has done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NIE Posted by: batteredup
Question
Posted by: heathehren on Jan 15, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are several books coming out on the subject, but wasn't Prescott Bush a partner/founder of a United States bank used as a front by the leading German Industrialist Families involved with the armament of the Nazi Regime? One such German company receiving slave labor from concentration camps such as auschwitz. This technically makes it 3 generations of Bush war profiteers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why no democracy for Saudi Arabia?
Posted by: yantacaw on Jan 16, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real news about Bush's visit to Saudi Arabia is ignored: The Saudi people live under an oppressive, medieval theocracy, happily proped-up for years by the US.

If building 'democracy' in Iraq is so direly important to American neocons, how is it that they gleefully embrace the Islamo-fascist monarchy in S. Arabia?

Answer: 'Democracy' is the neocon code-word for America's plundering of Iraqi petroleum.

Not complicated! (unless you're the average, hypnotized American voter.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]