Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama: Blackness Redefined

Posted by Tammy Johnson, RaceWire at 9:01 AM on January 12, 2008.


In the minds of white voters, is Obama really Black?
5
Jesse Jackson

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This week Amy Goodman's Democracy Now broadcast featured a discussion with Reverend Jesse Jackson that focused on race and the primary elections.

Much of the conversation centered on the Reverend's support of Barack Obama, and the perceived split of support among Black leaders and celebrities for various candidates. But what was really intriguing was Jackson's take on Obama's political handling of racial issues and his relation to the civil rights legacy which paved the way for his historical bid for the Presidency.

Death to the scary Black man

Goodman kicked off the sequence with a clip of William Bennett trumpeting the rise of the new Black man via Obama's Iowa victory.

"97% in fact, Iowa, rural white, farming state. Barack Hussein Obama, a black man, wins this for the Democrats. I have been watching him. I watched him on Meet the Press. I watched him on your show, watched him on all the CNN shows. He never brings race into it. He never plays the race card. Talk about the black community, he has taught the black community you don't have to act like Jesse Jackson, you don't have to act like Al Sharpton."

If you have been around racial politics long enough, you recognize the subtext of this argument. Obama's not a scary black man. He won't make white people confront racial inequities, deal with issues of privilege or the structural racism that undergirds this country. You get your chocolate without the calories and perhaps, without the nutrients as well. Reverend Jackson attributes the Iowa victory to the "maturing of America." I can buy into that thinking up to a point. After all, when white Iowans went into those voting booths they did punch the card for a brother. But was that a calculation that he was a safe bet? It takes me back to that scene in Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing, where the Italian, Pino, says of Black celebrities that he really likes, "They're not really Black." In the minds of white voters, is Obama really Black?

The Establishment Goes Black?

Reverend Jackson puts Obama's victory into a larger context of political and social struggle. He rightly runs down the battles that were fought in the streets, the courts, the White House, the jailhouse, the conventions and back rooms for at least four decades prior to the Obama run. What's noteworthy is that in every battle Jackson describes the push and pull that Blacks had to engage with the establishment (read Democratic Party and it's leadership) as opposed to the blatantly racist Jim Crow crowd; from MLK's forcing Johnson's hand on the Civil Rights Act, to challenging the party's values when it refused to demand the release of Mandela in apartheid South Africa. It begs the question: Will Obama, the beneficiary of the struggle, push the party on key issues of race? Will he do what Shirley Chisholm was unable to do, and force the party's platform to reflect the needs of all the people? Will he speak up against three-strikes laws, push for the repeal of welfare reform or stop the unfair the deportation of Haitian immigrants? Or will he play it safe and talk about racial unity with great eloquence, but very little substance? Jackson didn't go there in his public speculation, but somebody should.

Struggle Continues

Some would say that it's good that Obama doesn't address race directly. Here again, Jackson diplomatically puts such thinking into the uniquely American context.

"Well, there's a sense in which many Americans want to focus on racial reconciliation, and they ignore racial justice and racial equality. And you cannot ultimately get past those concerns...But Barack does not remind America of the unfinished business very much of racial justice, racial equality, but he need not. It's self-evident that that needs to happen."

If it is so self-evident, why does the good Reverend then go into detail about what he called "the state of emergency in Black America?" The list of racial wrongs was daunting: Increased incarceration rates, voting rights violations, mortgage foreclosure crisis and the general abandonment of civil rights for Blacks and Latinos. Jackson is right when he says that you can't take a pass on people's mental and emotional blocks on race. You have to confront it. Isn't that exactly what he is doing with his January 22 march on HUD and the housing crisis? Isn't that what he and countless numbers of civil rights and racial justice leaders have done for decades? Why lower the bar now? Obama may be successful in moving ahead politically by creating an image of being civil-rights-lite, but will communities of color reap the benefits as well? That's yet to be seen. Meanwhile, I'm off to the next coalition meeting.

Digg!

Tagged as: race, racism, obama, african americans, african american leaders, jackson

Tammy Johnson, the Director of the Race and Public Policy Program (RAPP) of the Applied Research Center (ARC) has many years experience as a community organizer, trainer and writer versed in race and public policy.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Pyzo
Posted by: Pyzo on Jan 12, 2008 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's interesting to consider what mixture of black and white equals white in America. Obama and Powell are but two examples.

In Australia, we have unresolved racial problems too. It's a difficult issue!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pyzo Posted by: mainspark
The O-bama Effect!
Posted by: bacalove on Jan 13, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an agent of Change, Obama has already had a positive effect and change on our political landscape as evidenced by the "nicer tones" of the current campaign commercials and political discourse prevalent today among the candidates, which heretofore has been down right dirty and nasty. This is due to Obama's position not too take the low road, continuing to walk the high road in spite of earlier low poll numbers -- and to focus and speak on the important issues facing us today, and continuing to inspire with his message of hope and change. -- And then they followed. All of the candidates, both Republican and Democratic, are now Agents of Change too!

The change Barack is inspiring us to make is in establishing and building a "People Coalition", which in turn will be the catalyst for the emerging of a new era in American history, an era of unity and not division, which can tap that awesome seed to put power back into the people's hands, where it belongs. For only the people, as a group untiy, can truly know what is in their best interest and make the changes, that is the only way true change can be made. Barack Obama, is asking us to forget our petty differences and false prejudices, as change, though attempted, cannot be made if there is not unity and a solid majority. It is impossible to implement change with bickering and divsion.

We all know that experience matters (and Barack has experience) -- but it also should be coupled with Judgment, Wisdom, Honesty and Integrity, and the ability to lead in a positive way. We have to remember and weigh its serious implications, that in the most important policy decision and debauchale of our times, the Iraq War, which has helped to escalate the present middle east situation, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards got it Wrong. Barack Obama got it Right. (See Obama's October 26, 2002 Iraq speech at an anti-war rally in Chicago.)

Most of the mass of people that come to hear Barack Obama speak see beyond Barack's color as his Soul radiates forth (that shaft of light) penetrating and speaking to our hearts, to the best in each of us -- inspiring us towards change by coming together and working together for this change. Many still today, and in the era of JFK, regarded President John F. Kennedy as an icon of American hopes and aspirations as they do Barack Obama now, and inspiration is the fuel for change. You will hear people say who have been to see Barack speak he has inspired them me to do better, not just feel better. To reach out to our enemies, to broker peace between nations. Even President Bush who has never been to the Holy Land in his entire 7 years of being Presdient was inspired to take a trip to Isreal and try to broker peace between Isreal and Palsestien.

In summary, we in the United States know innately that United we Stand and Divided we Fall. Barack is asking us to unite in a Common Cause so together we can face and defeat the Herculean Problems facing us today -- to finally intergrate us as a society into the 21st Century, catching up with technology like the interenet and cell phones all examples of internconnectiveness. This is our time and this is our calling!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The O-bama Effect! Posted by: pana
Words and Music
Posted by: Longdream on Jan 13, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Opera.

Most all the time, the drama is in the music to the same degree that it is in the words. On a rare occasion, an exalted voice sings the words for you with such heart, beauty and soul, and words meet music so exquisitely, that you feel it is you, yourself, singing and feeling a crescendo of love, or fear, or bitterness, or sorrow.

That's pretty dramatic, but it still expresses a little of what I experience when I encounter Obama.

There are his words. He can make a fine speech, no doubt about it. There are his ideas, and his ideals. All good. But the parts add up to something more. In his face, in his demeanor, in his voice, I somehow find the wild music of energy, and confidence, and righteousness without ugliness and hatred. I look at him and it comes to me that "this is the one who will be strong, this is the one who will stand up, this is the one who knows what matters."

MInd you, I'm no baby. I know fully well that I don't really know who Barack Obama is. He's on stage, I"m down here. But the music is insistent, and it goes on. There's none of Kucinich's flat sourness, or the frantic adagio present in John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. It goes on.

Forgive the metaphor, but it somehow expresses what I mean better than I could say it otherwise. The words are good, and the music is just right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barak and Jesse
Posted by: SEDGFLD on Jan 14, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a difference between an "Advocate" and a "Candidate" and J. Jackson understands this. It's time for us to grow up and also realize this. There are advocates who have been demonized, as King was, for reminding Americans that this has never been a Kum-bay-ah country. These same people, forgetting the realities of their own struggles and the reality that no Black man will get elected by shouting "Black Power" just like no female will get elected by shouting "Women rule".
Why is it that Barak Obama has to "prove he's Black enough" to some and has to "prove he's not too Black" to others and Hilary Clinton has to prove she's "Woman enough" or not "Too female". These stipulations are insulting, in themselves, especially when compared to the what others do and don't have to prove as candidates.
We hurt ourselves in this country by perpetuating these ridiculous stipulations on select candidates while giving a free ride to others.
Why don't people do some actual research and look into the candidates records and history while in and before being in the senate? Attention to these divide and conquer issues helped get us the most disastrous administration this country has ever had and we are continuing to help the same type of people get and remain in office by doing their dirty work.
It's time to grow up and stop letting ourselves be used by those opportunists who are the only ones benefitting from this juvenile and destructive behavior. Leaders need to put their egos and personal feelings about not being consulted and sought out, as they would like, behind the interests of what needs to be accomplished to get the opportunists, greedy, power hungry and bigots out of power and from direct control of the three branches of government, which some members have turned into hateful and harmful organizations controled by political hacks and opporunists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Amen Posted by: jimidee
Definitely something to it
Posted by: goeswithness on Jan 14, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being from a southern white family, containing the typical southern white attitudes, I can attest that, to them, there is a point where a black person becomes "middle class" enough (I was really searching for a decent adjective there) that in a way, they no longer view them as black. And Obama fits that category, so I support your point there. This is about as close as they're ever going to be with being comfortable with black people in authority.

But I don't think most white people think that way. And as for AA leadership, seems to me we might need both - somebody to remind us all that progress that has been made, giving us a vision of post-racism America, but also other people who don't let us forget and who remind us of all the many places where we still fall short.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama is no "brother"... Posted by: jimidee
» RE: I wish he were my brother. Posted by: Longdream
Caucus v. Secret Ballot
Posted by: MoEnzyme on Jan 14, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some poignant questions. However, the author needs to pay a little closer attention to the details of the process to know what it means. She says, "After all, when white Iowans went into those voting booths they did punch the card for a brother. But was that a calculation that he was a safe bet?" Iowa was a caucus not a secret ballot; nobody went into the booth. This is relevent because in a secret ballot people can vote their racist convictions without anyone seeing them, and in a caucus all your neighbors know how you are voting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caucus v. Secret Ballot Posted by: jimidee
Which white voters are you talking about?
Posted by: xbj on Jan 14, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you talking about Democratic white voters? Or are you talking about NaziGOP red state and blue state rural Amerikkka voters?

The answer, and who will win, and who can actually win this election, will hinge on the answer to THAT question.

Because we live in two very different Americas, and Obama will always be seen as a black man by those who live in the other Amerikkka.

You remember, don't you? The geniuses that gave us a man called Dubyah? The ones that would vote for Satan himself before they would vote for a black man? And DID vote for Satan himself just to get even for the Clinton years?

I won't ever forget. Nor will the dead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where do these "priorities" come from?
Posted by: jimidee on Jan 14, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Will he speak up against three-strikes laws, push for the repeal of welfare reform or stop the unfair the deportation of Haitian immigrants?"

Does Obama even believe that these issues are major problems that need to be addressed? Does he even think that they are "racial" issues? There are a lot of black folks out there who don't have those issues on top of their lists of priorities for the next administration. There are a lot of white folks that don't either.

There are a lot of things I want to see President Obama (and, oh yeah, I WANT him to be President!) tackle before he even looks at the above stated issues. There are lots of things that I want to see him use his excellent powers persuasion on besides these things. There are lots of things I want to see him work his diplomacy on, or apply his intellect to, besides these minor issues which are highly controversial as to whether they even need to be changed.

Does it make him any less "black" if he agrees with me? I think not!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At the very worst, harmless
Posted by: billwald on Jan 14, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the very worst, Obama will be ineffective and harmless while the other candidates are dangerous.

It will be worth it to take a chance on Obama if it might quiet the African-American apologists for the next 4 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jonnierae
Posted by: jonnie rae on Jan 14, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator Obama is trying to build a coalition in this country, a working majority of people who want to solve our country's problems, including problems in the criminal justice system, the educational system, the economic disparity that is so grossly unfair. In truth, these things affect all of us, not just black people. I worked on the Jackson campaign in 1984, called "The Poor People's Campaign" and he had the same idea. He noted that the greatest number of poor people in the US are single, white females. He noted that we are all part of the multi-colored quilt. He fought for what King fought for. An America that lives up to its highest ideals and principles. It's a changed world now, but still the only way to make substantive change is to build this majority coalition of people who want honesty, fairness, respectful dialogue, and change that helps restore the economic balance that has been shot to hell and to restore America's standing in the world and standing with ourselves. You are right, blogger, who made the distinction between advocate and presidential candidate. Jesse understands the whole picture, having been in both places. Obama is the way forward, without forgetting the past.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Obama Really Black?
Posted by: Saitia on Jan 14, 2008 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama ". . . is not a scary black man. He won't make white people confront racial inequities, deal with issues of privilege or the structural racism that undergirds this country."

With Hillary's injection of Dr. Martin Luther King smack dab in the middle of presidential politics this week, it's entirely fitting to note that Dr. King was hardly a "scary black man" either. And it's illuminating to note that Dr. King usually found genuine ways— often through his eloquence— to make not just white people, but all people, "confront racial inequities . . . or the structural racism that undergirds this country."

It's by no means a stretch to believe that Barack Obama can too.




". . .when white Iowans went into those voting booths they did punch the card for a brother. But was that a calculation that he was a safe bet?"

Of course it was! But in many minds, it was based on a willingness to trust and believe in the power of hope, not just in Obama, but also in our selves.



"In the minds of white voters, is Obama really Black?"

Let's take it upstairs—
In the mind of God, is Obama really black?

No; he's not black. He's not white; he's not half this and half that.
We can say with spiritual and intellectual confidence that God sees him the same way God sees all his children: as his sons and daughters. And that's the way anyone who believes in hope should see him as well.



Will Obama, the beneficiary of the struggle, push the party on key issues of race? Will he do what Shirley Chisholm was unable to do, and force the party's platform to reflect the needs of all the people?

Will he "push"? . . will he "force"? I certainly hope not. I "hope" not, precisely because that's the tried and truly wrong way to bring about the confrontation that will cause a change in heart in those who are capable of changing their hearts; something we should have already learned through "the struggle"; there's a right way and a wrong way to use the force of change.



. . .will he play it safe and talk about racial unity with great eloquence, but very little substance? Jackson didn't go there in his public speculation, but somebody should.

Very well: Why does a writer consider that talk— words written, or spoken— hold "very little substance"? Was no one moved to action when the truth was spoken to power through the eloquence of Dr. King? Should anyone not recognize that Barack Obama's eloquence in speaking truth to power has just begun to galvanize a new generation— and perhaps an old one— to action that can change the course of history?

The reason some maxims become clichéd and time worn is because they become the work horses of evolving insight. "It's always darkest before the dawn" in one such maxim, and Jesse Jackson's recent recitation of the factors of the "state of emergency in Black America" is yet another application of the darkest days, now upon us, being exposed to our personal experience; and Barack Obama, unless I miss my guess, is this nation's living and breathing herald of that dawn so long awaited, our best "calculation," our "safest bet" for the solutions of our nation's multiple states of emergency, born on the wings of new hope and belief in our selves; not just in Barack Obama, or his eloquent plea, to do just that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY
Posted by: geewhiz on Jan 14, 2008 3:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I WONDER IS JESSE JACKSON IS A MUSLIM? OR DID HE GET SKYLARKED BY HIS NEW BUDDY, THINKING HE'S COLORED INSTEAD OF LIGHT SKINNED, LIKE TOO MUCH TIME IN HAWAII? I WONDER?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY
Posted by: geewhiz on Jan 14, 2008 3:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I WONDER IS JESSE JACKSON IS A MUSLIM? OR DID HE GET SKYLARKED BY HIS NEW BUDDY, THINKING HE'S COLORED INSTEAD OF LIGHT SKINNED, LIKE TOO MUCH TIME IN HAWAII? I WONDER?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm sorry I can't rate this comment "1" again.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Jan 14, 2008 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry I can't rate this comment "1" again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Barack Obama can and cannot do for African Americans.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Jan 14, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not believe Barack Obama intends to use the office of the Presidency as black advocate in chief.

If he does, it is not the job for him. The President must represent all the American people, even, as George Bush never figured out, the ones who didn't vote for him, and the ones who don't pull the strings.

I believe that the greatest thing Senator Obama can do for black America is to show them that they can become a part of a different America, where black skin or white skin are like black hair or red hair - nothing much.

The first time I saw Barack Obama was at the 2004 Democratic convention, where he gave a speech that stunned me, and at least for a moment, the nation. If at first I thought, "He's a black guy," that thought was obliterated by the power of his words. I do recall thinking, "This guy may well be President," though I didn't think he would be the next President, because it was not possible that George Bush could be reelected. Little did I know.

As a law student, Barack Obama was President of the Harvard Law Review for his class. That is an honor very few people enjoy, and I can guarantee that a couple of hundred white guys deeply coveted the position. He did no get that honor by being an Uncle Tom, and he did not get it by forcing his ethnicity on everyone who crossed his path. He got it by exhibiting extraordinary competence within the structure and the culture of the institution he belonged to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]