Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Forgets His Grandpa Profited from Nazi Slave Labor

Posted by Jon Ponder, Pensito Review at 11:37 AM on January 11, 2008.


This just further reminds us of the unique kid-glove treatment George W. Bush receives from the media.
prescottbushhitler
Prescott Bush

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

George Bush toured the Holocaust memorial in Israel yesterday, and through tears, came up with a telling formulation about what his predecessor, Pres. Franklin Roosevelt, should have done to stop the horror at the German concentration camps:

President George W. Bush had tears in his eyes during an hour-long tour of Israel's Holocaust memorial and told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the U.S. should have bombed Auschwitz to halt the killing, the memorial's chairman said.

Bush emerged from a tour of the Yad Vashem memorial today calling it a "sobering reminder" that evil must be resisted, and praising victims for not losing their faith.

Wearing a yarmulke, Bush placed a red-white-and-blue wreath on a stone slab that covers ashes of Holocaust victims taken from six extermination camps. He also lit a torch memorializing the victims.

Bush was visibly moved as he toured the site, said Yad Vashem's chairman, Avner Shalev.

"Twice, I saw tears well up in his eyes," Shalev said.

At one point, Bush viewed aerial photos of the Auschwitz camp taken during the war by U.S. forces and called Rice over to discuss why the American government had decided against bombing the site, Shalev said.

"We should have bombed it," Bush said, according to Shalev.

If the only tool you have is a hammer, the saying goes, then every solution will look like a nail. Thus, in Bush's primitive brain, the best way to stop the horror at the camps would have been to bomb the hell out of them.

Mainly, though, it's hard to get past the cognitive dissonance of reading an utterance from Bush that was not crafted by the White House political shop and focus-grouped in Paramus to ensure the words he speaks do not mean what they say.

It also reminds us of the unique kid-glove treatment George W. Bush receives from the media. It is impossible to imagine any other politician whose grandfather had profited from Nazi slave labor who could tour a Holocaust memorial with the media in tow and not be hounded for a comment on his grandfather's role in the horror.

First the history: Before the war, the Hitler regime's mistreatment of Jews -- particularly the government's policy of ethnically cleansing Jews out of mixed neighborhoods into Jewish-only ghettos -- may have seemed less outrageous in the racially segregated America of the late 1930s than it does today. The same goes for conscripting Jews into forced labor. In 1942, just four years after the Germans began sending Jews to labor camps, the U.S. government sent thousands of Japanese-American citizens into camps in the west, for example.

While the American public had no idea about the mass killings until after the camps were liberated in 1945, the debate continues even now among historians about the extent of FDR's knowledge of the genocide while it was underway. He died in April that year, just four months after Auschwitz was captured.

In the scheme of things, however, the martyrdom of the Jews, Gypsies and gay people in the camps has had a positive effect on European and German society, for the entirety of civilization, because the fact that the camps were intact at the war's end provided irrefutable evidence of the genocide.

For example, after the war, the Allied commanders forced rank and file German citizens, who claimed not to have known that their government was gassing 6 million people literally under their noses, to tour the camps to see with their own eyes the horror wrought in their names (and with their tax dollars) -- and to witness the inevitable result of the bigotry ingrained in their culture. Forcing the Germans to accept the horrible truth about Nazism contributed to bringing an end to Germany's decades of aggression against its neighbors, once and for all.

What has been all but forgotten, however, is the role of Prescott Bush, George W. Bush's grandfather, who was in business with the Nazis even after the U.S. entered the war in late 1941:

George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

We will never know if George Bush gave any thought to his grandfather's role in the creation of the Nazi camps while he toured a memorial to the horror they produced. One of his biggest flaws is his instinctive reflex to deflect responsibility for his own failings, so it is unlikely he'd see any connection between himself, the family fortune that paved his way to power and the portion of it that came from profits from his grandfather's business dealings with Hitler's government.

That would hit him a little too close to home.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, israel, holocaust, nazis, germany, prescott bush

Jon Ponder is regular blogger for the Pensito Review


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bartleby
Posted by: Bartleby1701 on Jan 11, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good Post -

Just one thing...

Your criticism of Bush's "we should have bombed it" remark might be a bit off base. I recall seeing a documentary on the U.S. response to the Holocaust that recounted that Jewish groups and a few of their gentile allies in America, desperate to put a stop to the industrial scale of killing, actually begged the War Department to bomb the gas chambers of Auschwitz. The picture that Bush was referring to was very probably one of the most chilling moments in the film. The War Department refused to concede to the request to bomb, sticking to the U.S. policy that by that time held that to end the war was to end the killing, therefore, no military efforts should be 'wasted' on non-military targets. They told the Jewish groups that besides, they were incapable of conducting bombing missions that far into the interior of occupied Poland.
Well.... the picture is chilling because what it revealed was that (shocking) the Pentagon lied: they were regularly bombing in that area - in fact, in that particular picture, taken from above, looking down at bombs having just dropped out of a plane on the way to their target (an oil refinery or something like that), right below, on the ground beneath the bombs, is very clearly - Auschwitz. It's truly an amazing photo.
While certainly there is room for debate about whether it was strategically wise or morally wise to bomb or not to bomb the gas chambers (historians debate it to this day), this does not fall into the category of typical Bush stupidity.

I don't believe I'm defending Bush - but I just thought the historical record should be explained.

I don't remember every detail and I don't have time to look it all up right now, but I do know that this was in fact a legitimate and even desired response during that time.

Otherwise... I would just KILL for a reporter to ask Bush to comment on how he reconciles the actions of his grandpappy. Ok, I'm a progressive, maybe not kill...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bartleby Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Bartleby Posted by: moflard
» RE: Bartleby Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Bartleby Posted by: sui_generis
Bush is...
Posted by: charemor1 on Jan 11, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is not only a phony and a fraud, but he is also full of crap. The biggest mass murderer since Hitler is "moved" by this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush is... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Bush is... Posted by: blitzmesser
» Alligator Tears Posted by: Artkansas
» ...and a Crocodile Smile Posted by: wagadog
» RE: ...and a Crocodile Smile Posted by: blitzmesser
A Couple Of Things
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 11, 2008 3:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some other commentators have mentioned Bush's apparent show of emotion probably being staged. I must point out that Bush seemingly cried on the heels of Hillary winning NH (winning probably due to her tears). I can't for one second think that the President REALLY cares one squat about human lives lost. So, yes, my vote is that Bush was faking it.
And I too wonder if bombing the death camps would have caused the casualties of prisoners there, especially in the days before "smart" bombs.
Yet, I am not surprised that Bush would blame FDR, a Democrat, for not bombing the camps, even if such bombings would have done more harm than good. Heck, I am not surprised that Bush would have advocated the bombing of the camps ESPECIALLY because such bombings would do more harm than good. What's the fun in bombing something if you can't kill some innocent people? Right, Georgie?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

haven't you heard?
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jan 11, 2008 5:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hypocrisy is the new american way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aryan Elite. They all think the same.
Posted by: lc on Jan 12, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Auschwitz was originally built for 10,000 and later upgraded to 30,000 to support the new city of Auschwitz, Aryan Central for the elite, and a giant new factory complex to make war materials. Thirty thousand slaves for a factory complex that should have been bombed; forget bombing the barracks or train tracks.
Grandpa Bush would not stop financing Hitler until the US Congress passed legislation forbidding him to do so. Bush then and Bush now, neither care about anything but money and power: our money and their power to abuse US.
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some mass murders are sadder than others?
Posted by: mnascimento on Jan 12, 2008 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, mass murder, by a foreign government a generation ago is much worse to Bush than what he is perpetrating now. The poor man is moved to tears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush Doctrine
Posted by: drsivana99 on Jan 12, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell, why doesn't he just go ahead and bomb the place NOW? I mean, the fact that the Germans stopped exterminating Jews 60 years ago only means they could start back again at any time. Don't tell me Bush is going soft.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush Doctrine Posted by: blitzmesser
Diary of a Secret State
Posted by: manderson on Jan 12, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jan Karski; a Polish Army officer who was captured by the Russians when Germany invaded Poland in 1939, then escaped to be captured by the Germans and put in a Gestapo prison, only to escape after being beaten nearly to death by the S.S.; wrote the book "Diary of a Secret State", was the first to inform the U.S. government (at least in a more or less "official" way) about the "Final Solution". His book was published during the war...

His account of a conversation with Judge Felix Frankfurter about the camps after coming to the U.S. makes me think that our government knew about it, and condoned it. It's a horrifying, educational read, especially his accounts of going to the Warsaw Ghetto undercover and watching Hitler Youth roaming the streets "hunting" for Jews with handguns; and posing as a German officer going to a train station where they loaded Jews onto cattle cars in the middle of winter, some naked and freezing.

It would seem, then, by the evidence we have currently, that a Fascist Bush is a Fascist Bush, regardless of era.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

crocodile tears
Posted by: Kuressaare on Jan 12, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would not believe in one of them. Also the greatest mass murderer, someone better read "Hitler's Pope", Pacelli (pius XII but not in my nomenclature). He was working on his designs for a new order, (Pope supreme) I think his record of 60 million killed since before 1900 and on to 1934 put him at the absolute top of mass murderers. There are testmonials as to his watching the rounding up, beating, some killing of the Jews in St. Peter's Square, he was leaning on his loggia or out his window, for an extended period of time, seen by hundreds of thousands of subhumans I suppose we must assume. He said and wrote not one word. One reason was that he said the Germans had cracked the Vatican Code, and we know that the British had cracked the German codes in both wars, property of u.s.a. thereafter also {when it suited the Brits}. But realising Pacelli worked on his master plan beginning under Bismarck's Kulturkampf and then up to two weeks before June 28 in l914, when the Archduke/Crown Prince and his wife were killed in Sarajevo, Pacelli had only one desire, and that was to keep that pot so hard on the boil that it was about to blow up. The Austrians wanted an excuse to humiliate the Serbs, a great thorn in their side. and they got much much more: they could not possibly have not declared war, and the world got what? 40 or 60 million dead? and Pacelli kept it up: he loved Yugoslavia as ot became , a Serb colonial holding. What happened there in his Croatia: when he had his Catholics led my his very own fascist amidst scenes only the recent ones can equal it was so much like what we saw recently it makes me want to weep. I suppose the new guy on the papal throne will have Pacelli as saint sometime quite soon. Shame and concsience are no longer validities in this world, to many in power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reasons to read "hitler's Pope"
Posted by: Kuressaare on Jan 12, 2008 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I did not make it clear, author John Cornwell (Hitler's Pope) is a Roman Catholic and directs the Science and Human Dimension Project at Jesus College, Cambridge. He was given access to Vatican documents never seen by outsiders before. And he was so horrified at the documented truth that toward the end of his research he knew he had to tell it in print to a wider audience. The most important part is that the scene of U.S. tanks breaking into Bergen Belsen and revealing the horror to the world, true as it may be, -- still the breaking of codes permitted wide dissemination of the truth as it was happening years before. Alone among Jews on U.S. coasts, nearly ever one knew what was happening to their families, but it was far greater than that, the widespread knowledge: if you read this book you will be amazed, unless you remember how it really was. Of those alive still who remember the thirties and remember we knew even then what Hitler was doing in his camps? Because there is documentation, records of meetings, histories of the protest movement on North American soil and pleas to governments? Is that the reason this was not mentioned, for I remember as a shoolboy learning that the Dominican Republic was taking in a shipload of Jews, but Canada wanted no part of them, and the U.S. was little better until late in the war and the onslaught of those horrifying films form the camps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prescott in Hungary
Posted by: mia66 on Jan 12, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was wondering if it would be worth looking into the Hungarian branch of the Thyssen family. Prescott was well known & is still referred to and revered in Hungary by the the sort of gangster businessman that is best avoided.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prescott in Hungary Posted by: Intellect
Now Let Me Get This Straight....
Posted by: tommy1957 on Jan 13, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We elected a president whose father was a Nazi sympathizer and collaborator. Yet some of you say Roosevelt and the pentagon are just as responsible? I am really confused. First off; any money that can be tied to support of the Nazi's to current day should be stripped from the Bush estate and given to any living survivors of the work camps. The Bush's should formally condemn by congress for their participation in support the Nazis. And shame on any American who voted for a Bush. You are all Nazi sympathizers. Now back to the Roosevelt and Pentagon issue; if they would have bombed Auschwitz, innocent civilians would have died and the Nazi would have simply shot the Jews like they were doing before the gassing. I not sure how killing innocent people would have saved anyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John MacMurray
Posted by: jbgoode on Jan 13, 2008 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The really big mystery is why the whole Bush family, especially Big George, has gotten a free pass on everything from adultery to fleecing the government in the S & L scandal.
Makes ya think our alleged news agencies are either afraid of Big George or in cahoots with him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: John MacMurray Posted by: tap17x
THERE IS REASON TO SUSPECT THAT THE BUSH FAMILY
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 15, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
kept their holdings in Germany through a numbered account in Switzerland. They made money on both sides of the pond. The profits were kept secretly in Switzerland for them until after the war. There is no limit to the cynicism of the wealthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]