Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Speaking the Unspeakable About Obama and Race

Posted by Pam Spaulding, Pam's House Blend at 7:08 AM on January 7, 2008.


Remember John Kerry and the Swift Boat attacks. He thought ignoring it and taking the high road would pass as a "response." How wrong he was.
amdbarackobama
barack

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This country has so many issues ahead of us, the economy, Iraq, health care, our shredded civil liberties, yet the fact that we as a country still cannot discuss race; we deny the role it plays in the political discourse when discussing Obama. There isn't a discussion of the tried and true race-baiting tactics that have been used by both parties to stoke fear in the Base of The Black Man at the polls (remember the Harold Ford ads?). Will there be an honest discussion about these political tactics and how they will play out in 2008, or will pundits dance around it, making only veiled references because a frank discussion about race and its toxic role in political elections makes people uncomfortable.

After running that cowardly, vile Freeper post about Obama the night he won in Iowa, several people have posted about it. A recap of the filth:

Did the weakest Dem candidate for the general election won tonight? I think so.

By sending forth Hussein Osama out of Iowa, Democrats have unwittingly weakened their general election prospects.

Hussein's exotic mixture of radical liberalism, Kwanzaa Socialism, antipathy towards the unborn, and weakness against his jihadi brethren will all come back to destroy him against almost any Republican opponent, even the snake-grope from Hope.

I think we as Republicans should be celebrating tonight at the coronation of Hussein, in whose presence millions of Democrat women, from elementary school teachers to journalism majors to law school grads to dykes on bikes will go weak in their knees.

As defenders of this great Republic, and of the pinnacle of Western civilization that it represents, we should all come together tonight and agree on a common strategy that will keep the White House from becoming a madrassa.

God Bless America, Land of the Free.

Some thought that there's no point bringing attention to the bigoted fringe element, others thought this is the tip of the iceberg and it should not go unnoticed.

For me it's not about elevating these bottom-feeder attacks, per se, it's showing how raw people are willing to be under the cover of anonymity, and it gives license for other veiled attacks (remember, Hillary's supporters were caught with their pants down perpetuating the Muslim smear in Iowa). Hillary's supporters/camp has tried to "go there" with the casual raising of Obama's drug use as a teen to get that story back into media play.

Freepers may be fringe, but if you've got Dem supplicants willing to go there who aren't crazy, you can imagine the unending drumbeat of similar race-baiting that will go on in the mainstream GOP. And we all know what kind of third party Republican mailers end up in mailboxes not tied to the party. It's going to be toned down very little from what that Freeper said in that post, the GOP will decry the tactics, but the low-information voters can be swayed. The people who honestly don't think they are racist, but can be influenced by what we think is ridiculous propaganda.

Remember John Kerry and the Swift Boat attacks. He thought ignoring it and taking the high road would pass as a "response." How wrong he was. Rovian tactics of repeating lies so often that they become a truth to the target audience is time tested.

For every fringe element there will be less ham-handed but equally offensive tactics used by the GOP to race-bait and hide behind the cover of "I'm not racist look over there at the Free Republic." Note the community guidelines of the FR actually ban people for racist posts, so obviously this sort of thing passes muster as fair game. The key is to make the GOP answer for its Base. They court this vote, they own it.

Obama's success has again raised the issue of his safety, given the crazies out there. Chris Rabb of Afro-Netizen reacting to the Freeper post:

It would seem that Obama's that much more of a threat to these hateful hordes among us in blue and red states alike, as evinced in a recent racist blog post by anonymous coward hiding safely behind a computer somewhere between sea to shining sea. (Hat tip to über-blogger Pam Spaulding.)

I fear Obama's fate as a front-runner. I think about murdered politico Bobby Kennedy -- an ultra-wealthy White public servant, and the fear he instilled in an unknown mass of the White citizenry in 1968. And my concern heightens that much more for Senator Obama and his family amidst of his auspicious win this evening.

Click here to read the rest of this post.

Digg!

Tagged as: race, racism, obama, african americans

Pam Spaulding blogs at Pam's House Blend.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
samothrellim
Posted by: milltom on Jan 7, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, the underside is capable of anything, but it would appear that Bobby Kennedy (as well as JFK) died at the hands of the Mafia, and not some crazy. Read about it in the recently published "Bobby and J. Edgar" - a fascinating book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grow Up, America
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 7, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Polls (The POLLS! Ka-boom!) say that Americans would rather vote against a woman simply because of her gender rather than against an Afro-American simply because of his race. But what does this poll really signify? That sexism is apparently more acceptable than racism in our society. However, if you look at how people ACTUALLY vote and not at what they tell pollsters, then I am certain that the poll's percentages would have been reversed -- Americans will, when nobody is looking, vote against the Black man because of his race in unacceptable numbers.
I think it is time we as Americans grow up already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Grow Up, America Posted by: niliadis
» RE: Grow Up, America Posted by: VZEQICVA
What you mean "WE", Kimosabe
Posted by: papananook on Jan 7, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It always annoys or amuses me (depending on current mood) when someone says "we" this or that...as if the willfully ignorant Sheeple are listening or the relatively enlightened need reminding.
The collective "we" here are apparently the childish racists or gender biased who will grow up on demand from the progressive left.
However, I take the point, QQ, but in the case of Barrack Obama, whom I will NOT vote for any more than Hillary, the point is moot for me because he (and she) are far to ready to maintain the military options so often misused and that which feeds the corporate war machine, the toolers and suppliers of the guns, tanks, munitions, equipment. The MIC must be lickin' it's chops. It's not "CHANGE", that overused and undefined buzzword, it's status quo. What difference does it make between race or gender if the stranglehold (thank you John Edwards) of the corporations is not thrown off?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hussein
Posted by: fbc21ca on Jan 7, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I recall, King Hussein of Jordan (RIP) was a beloved and trusted friend of the US for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take your stand Woman of America!!!!
Posted by: niliadis on Jan 7, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Woman will take a 25 year back with the loss of a woman president. Women already are making
60% less money than men in the same jobs. We need to think of our up in coming woman graduates,if they can not understand this. Oh
Obama is cute..small minded-but is he capable?
What are his issues? only pretty look and empty words. Woman we can take a stand!! its time!!! Men are even voting for her..Is it that they are secure within themselves Yes Bravo to all those men that know what is the best for our country! Bravot to you!
I could understand if Obama had the experience and the capabilities to run our country, but he does not. He is running of hope and change. What hope? What change? You need experience to bring change and make hope a reality. Can we even trust to put our country in his hand? NO
He can not win! Some Women just don't get it..
We are just as capable, but apparently little minded will follow the man. Sad day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No, thanks, I'll wait for Cindy Posted by: papananook
Let's support a winning candidate
Posted by: certifiedhypnotist on Jan 7, 2008 9:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards is the clean money candidate who has the best positions on health care, Iraq, on the environment, and on camaign funding. If you want change, he is the one most likely to deliver. Plus polls indicate that he is the only leading Democrat who can beat any of the Republicans. Talk about a winning package!

Both Clinton and Obama have worse postions on the issues, are taking money from the wrong sources and may well not be electable in a national election. The corporate media have seen to it that we focus on personalities, trivia and empty rhetoric and that people who ought to know better are surprisingly ignorant of the issues. Nothing new there.

We are so lucky that the best one of the three is also the most electable. Do your homework, folks and then get out in support of Edwards. There is a lot at stake. Let's not blow it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards/Obama or Obama/Edwards 2008
Posted by: sunspot on Jan 8, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards/Obama or Obama/Edwards 2008

I think that would be a great ticket. Bill Richardson, Secretary of State. Ron Paul, Secretary of the Treasury. Dennis Kucinich, Secretary of Health & Human Services.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]