Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Several New Polls Show Obama Pulling Ahead of Clinton in NH

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 8:09 PM on January 6, 2008.


According to CNN: Obama and Edwards get Iowa bounce going into New Hampshire; Hil slips.
obamahillarywinmcnameet

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

UPDATE: A bunch of new NH polls in, via Real Clear Politics ...

Strategic Vision:
Obama 38, Clinton 29, Edwards 19, Richardson 7

Franklin Pierce:
Obama 34, Clinton 31, Edwards 20, Richardson 6

USA Today/Gallup:
Obama 41, Clinton 28, Edwards 19, Richardson 6

CNN/WMUR (PDF):
Obama 39, Clinton 29, Edwards 16, Richardson 7

Note that the last CNN/WMUR poll discussed below showed Clinton and Obama in a virtual tie.

Also worth noting is RCP's average of all the latest polls:
Obama 37.0, Clinton 29.8, Edwards 18.6, Richardson 5.8

***

Just a little poll watching on a Sunday.

As Steve Benen noted, the first poll out after Iowa, a small sample-poll by Rasmussen, had Obama up by 37-27 over Clinton, with Edwards at 19%.

CNN/WMUR released a poll today yesterday with a bigger sample, and the results show a tighter race:

Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois are tied, with each grabbing the support of 33 percent of likely Democratic primary voters in the Granite State, according to a new CNN/WMUR New Hampshire presidential primary poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire.

Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina is in third place with 20 percent, according to the poll, which was released Saturday afternoon, three days before the primary.

"Both Obama and Edwards appear to have benefited from the Iowa caucuses. Each picked up three points in New Hampshire. Clinton lost one point, since our last poll taken before the caucuses," said CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider.

On the Republican side, John McCain has emerged the leader of the GOP pack in New Hampshire.

Thirty-three percent of likely GOP Granite State primary voters support the senator from Arizona, with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney six points back at 27 percent.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's in third place at 14 percent, with former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in fourth place at 11 percent.

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas follows with 9 percent, and Rep. Duncan Hunter of California and former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee are tied at 1 percent.

Important caveat: polls are a snapshot in time, and this one was conducted before Saturday's debates.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, election08, mccain, edwards, giuliani, romney, huckabee, paul, new hampshire

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
Bill Maher Kicks Zucker's Conservative Ass at the Box Office
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of the conservative film An American Carol.
Post by Jane Hamsher. October 6, 2008.
A Desperate McCain Attacks Obama With Vicious Smears
With his campaign flailing, McCain shamelessly tries to manipulate voters by appealing to their 'lizard brains.'
Post by Arianna Huffington. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Huckabee bounce?
Posted by: brunowe on Jan 6, 2008 4:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been checking the polls on Pollster.com and RealClearPolitics.com as well. The numbers look rather bad for Romney and, alas, Edwards. I'm not sure the latter's campaign will survive a distance third-place finish.

So, do you still think that there will be a big Huckabee bounce and when do you think Thompson will drop out. I suspect he'll have a last throw of the dice in South Carolina and then fold, endorsing McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huckabee bounce? Posted by: Joshua Holland
averageaussie
Posted by: averageaussie on Jan 7, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does any body else have the feeling there will be a political assassination in the next year or so?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I too have a concern
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 7, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Averageaussie has brought to bear a real concern that I share. The very real possibility of harm coming to a candidate, and I am assuming here that his/her thoughts are for Senator Obama. We live in a very violent country where emotions run high and hatreds run deep.

I hope this concern is for naught and that you will say these fears are "silly". But I do fear, very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Romney
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 7, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Huck got a "bounce" I think Romney got "flattened". It has been very interesting to date, watching the republicans in this cycle. For some reason (?), it seems like the other candidates on the republican bench dislike Mitt intensely. It has been reported that one of the reasons is because of the immense wealth Romney has which he uses to run negative ads., but that can't be all of it. Negativity on both sides of the political spectrum is part of their game plan.

I know why I don't like him but then I'm not a republican and wouldn't vote for him for anything. Trying to be as objective as I can, were I a republican, I would be troubled by his obvious phoniness, pandering, and general disengagement from the American working people.

What has amazed me the most about this particular candidate are his outrageous statements that he has made that have almost immediately been vetted. In particular his great hunting background as well as ol' dad marching with MLK. To be truthful, I didn't really believe that he pulled to the side of the road and wept over Civil Rights either.

Do you think I'm wrong in pretty much dismissing him as "toast"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: omney Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: You're Right! Posted by: Sissy
» RE: omney Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Romney's Smile Posted by: Sissy
bildab
Posted by: Barger on Jan 7, 2008 7:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's nice that intelligent and shrewd Democrats are doing well in the northern states. But how do Obama and Hillary play in the Southern states (what are the poll numbers) and can the Democrats win without them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bildab Posted by: Sissy
» RE: bildab Posted by: Sissy