Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

George McGovern Calls for Bush and Cheney's Impeachment

Posted by Paul Rosenberg, Open Left at 9:01 AM on January 6, 2008.


Calling it "the only honorable course" for him to take, Former Senator George McGovern calls for impeachment in a Washington Post editorial.
mcgoverncloseup
McGovern

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

"Nixon Was Bad. These Guys Are Worse."

Calling it "the only honorable course" for him to take, Former Senator George McGovern calls for impeachment.

In a Washington Post editorial, "Why I Believe Bush Must Go", former Senator George McGovern has called for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, saying they "are clearly guilty of numerous impeachable offenses." McGovern went on to say that "American democracy has been derailed throughout the Bush-Cheney regime."

In addition to the folly, deceit, illegality and immorality of the Iraq War, McGovern also cited the bungling of Hurricane Katrina.

"Impeachment is unlikely, of course," McGovern wrote, "But we must still urge Congress to act."

Impeachment, quite simply, is the procedure written into the Constitution to deal with presidents who violate the Constitution and the laws of the land. It is also a way to signal to the American people and the world that some of us feel strongly enough about the present drift of our country to support the impeachment of the false prophets who have led us astray. This, I believe, is the rightful course for an American patriot.

McGovern went on to quote former representative Elizabeth Holtzman, a key figure in the Nixon impeachment proceedings, who wrote two years ago:

A President, any President, who maintains that he is above the law -- and repeatedly violates the law -- thereby commits high crimes and misdemeanors."

While convetional wisdom sees impeachment as divisive, McGovern sees things from the opposite perspective, stressing the need for healing and restoration:

I believe we have a chance to heal the wounds the nation has suffered in the opening decade of the 21st century. This recovery may take a generation and will depend on the election of a series of rational presidents and Congresses. At age 85, I won't be around to witness the completion of the difficult rebuilding of our sorely damaged country, but I'd like to hold on long enough to see the healing begin.

In a key part of his editorial, McGovern wrote:

Bush and Cheney are clearly guilty of numerous impeachable offenses. They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed national and international law. They have lied to the American people time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced our beloved country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the world. These are truly "high crimes and misdemeanors," to use the constitutional standard.

From the beginning, the Bush-Cheney team's assumption of power was the product of questionable elections that probably should have been officially challenged -- perhaps even by a congressional investigation.

In a more fundamental sense, American democracy has been derailed throughout the Bush-Cheney regime. The dominant commitment of the administration has been a murderous, illegal, nonsensical war against Iraq. That irresponsible venture has killed almost 4,000 Americans, left many times that number mentally or physically crippled, claimed the lives of an estimated 600,000 Iraqis (according to a careful October 2006 study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) and laid waste their country. The financial cost to the United States is now $250 million a day and is expected to exceed a total of $1 trillion, most of which we have borrowed from the Chinese and others as our national debt has now climbed above $9 trillion -- by far the highest in our national history.

All of this has been done without the declaration of war from Congress that the Constitution clearly requires, in defiance of the U.N. Charter and in violation of international law. This reckless disregard for life and property, as well as constitutional law, has been accompanied by the abuse of prisoners, including systematic torture, in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

McGovern also specifically contrasted Bush and Cheney with Nixon:

I have not been heavily involved in singing the praises of the Nixon administration. But the case for impeaching Bush and Cheney is far stronger than was the case against Nixon and Vice President Spiro T. Agnew after the 1972 election. The nation would be much more secure and productive under a Nixon presidency than with Bush. Indeed, has any administration in our national history been so damaging as the Bush-Cheney era?

How could a once-admired, great nation fall into such a quagmire of killing, immorality and lawlessness?

Finally, the editorial ended on a wistful note of muted optimism:

There has never been a day in my adult life when I would not have sacrificed that life to save the United States from genuine danger, such as the ones we faced when I served as a bomber pilot in World War II. We must be a great nation because from time to time, we make gigantic blunders, but so far, we have survived and recovered.

A great man has spoken. Is anyone listening?

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, impeachment, cheney, nixon, mcgovern

Paul Rosenberg is a regular blogger for Open Left


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
jeanruss
Posted by: jeanruss on Jan 6, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
finally impeachment is getting some traction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kucinich is listening, but are others?
Posted by: Ripcord on Jan 6, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I boycotted the ABC debates last night.

I wonder if the issue of Impeachment came up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on Jan 6, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God bless George McGovern! The Bush-Cheney fascist regime must be held accountable for America to regain the respect of the world and move forward. To let them off would be no different than letting Hitler retire to the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: oldfreedomdude Posted by: undrgrndgirl
High Crimes And Misdemeanors
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 6, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many right-wingers say that what Bush has done is not that bad, because (the fact remains) Bush has not been impeached. (Clinton, on the other hand, was indeed impeached. So therefore, in the right-wingers' view, Clinton's crime was infinitely worse than all of Bush's crimes put together.)

But impeachment is too good for Bush and Cheney. They should be tried and then suffer the consequences (including possible execution) of their sadism, fascism, lies, mass-murder, torture, and general criminality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» High Crimes And Misdemeanors Posted by: james2021
Impeach Bush and Cheney
Posted by: rewassenich on Jan 6, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a good reason for impeaching Nixon. The impeachment trial for President Clinton was unnecessary. False religious and modesty hysteria did its work then. I am all for impeaching Bush and Cheney, but the Congress and many of the US citizens don't have the guts to do it (as Mr. McGovern hinted at). Bush and Cheney represent the worst US administration in history. Impeachment is the one way to show the world that not every American is a 'born again scoundrel'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What kind of example does Pelosi want to set?
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jan 6, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm really disturbed about the prospect of George W. Bush being recorded in future history books as an honorable president. Without him being impeached, I think every upcoming generation of school kids will be fed a whitewashed version of his legacy. To me, this is unacceptable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask your represtative to back HR 799...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 6, 2008 1:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and VOTE Dennis Kucinich!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you George McGovern.
Posted by: EdinIowa on Jan 6, 2008 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But there's little reason to think this is going to give the issue any more traction. We hear over and over regarding impeachment there isn't the political will to do it, the people don't want it, it would never succeed, etc.

The only way to know if that's true is to test it. Impeachemnt is a non-issue to the MSM - and has been - but if the House would move it would become a major issue. If the House moved to impeach then the evidence in support of the Articles of Impeachment would be gathered and presented for all the people to see, as well as the Senate. There are certainly Republican senators who might break with the party in the face of public outrage. And if the people were more aware of the extent of the criminality of Bush & co., I'm convinced outrage WOULD follow.

There was little sentiment - in the Congress - to move against Nixon in 74 either. It was only as the public demanded it (spurred on by an MSM that was actually reporting on the issue) that the House moved. And only then, as the evidence supporting the Articles of Impeachment were presented, did the whole tide turn for Nixon - his own party abandoning him. The difference then was a media that wasn't nearly as concentrated and monopolized as it is today, and with independent news divisions that tended to take their responsibilities seriously. A far cry from the corporate MSM of today and its too-cozy relationship with Bush and Congress.

But even all of that doesn't matter one damn bit. These people, our representatives, take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, and that document states:

"The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

It doesn't say may be, might be, or proceed ONLY IF YOU CAN WIN. It says "shall be". The crimes of Bush & co far exceed anything Nixon did (much less Clinton) and they're documented, the indictment already exists, and the out-of-power Democrats talked in favor of moving forward. That's all gone since Jan. 07.

It has to start with the House, the MSM is ignoring the issue, only the actions of the House can bring it front and center. Pressure has got to be increased on Congress to ACT - it has to come from the people. And the greatest obstacle to that is not us - here - who know it has to be done, and have let our representatives know, and continue to. And it's not the blissfully ignorant who don't even realize how criminal this administration has been.

The real obstacles are every person out there that KNOWS how bad it is, KNOWS that they should be impeached, but says "let's move on, let's leave it to history, there's no will for it, it can't succeed, let's mend fences" on and on ad nauseum. That significant portion of the public needs to make their voices heard by Congress instead of capitulating. Some of us, many of us here, have been trying for a long time but we need the help of those WHO KNOW BETTER but still seek to sweep it under the rug.

It's vital that it be done, that the crimes of this administration not go unpunished and undocumented. And equally vital as a warning to future presidents. The arguments against it coming from the House are hollow, they really can't be seen as anything but a silent admission of complicity by the party leadership.

And I'm not ready to believe for a minute that these people are guaranteed to get theirs once they're out of office. They may have outstanding warrants over their heads but that won't stop them from living out lives of comfort, a brigade of Blackwater goons at their side. Doesn't Kissinger have warrants over his head even today? So much for justice after-the-fact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Pelosi?
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jan 6, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bush and Cheney were impeached, Nancy Pelosi would become president. We now know that she has secretly condoned, aided, abetted, connived at, misprisoned and otherwise supported both war crimes, including torture, forced disappearance and murder, and unconstitutional invasions of privacy of millions of Americans. Her public rhetoric notwithstanding, these facts reveal her to be a closet neocon with no respect for international and American law or the Constitution. While I favor the impeachment and removal, as well as criminal trial, of Bush and Cheney, any such initiative must incorporate replacement of the Speaker with an ethical person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: President Pelosi? Posted by: Frank J. Burris
Democratic Party: Soft on the Criminals Bush and Cheney
Posted by: left_libertarian on Jan 7, 2008 3:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although there are a few with spine and care for the rule of law. In all, the Democratic Party is more concerned with politics than the principle of justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment isn't enough!
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 7, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMPEACH-INDITE-IMPRISON-EXECUTE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TALK IS CHEAP
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 7, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've signed petitions, sent e-mails and backed Kucinich, Conyers and anyone else who wanted to begin impeachment proceedings. All they do is talk. They don't need Pelosi, it's an excuse. I'm all for impeachment and have been for a long time but no one is willing to take on the responsibility. Fact is, this administration has never been seriously challenged by anyone from the very beginning. Yes, I know what the Constitution says, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My new favorite bumber sticker
Posted by: meadowlake59 on Jan 7, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
01-20-09

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats are part of the problem
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jan 7, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is we don't have an opposition party. There's the GOP and the Democratic party that aids and abets the Republican agenda. We know what to expect from these parties, so there's no reason to anticipate any great leaps in progressive policy from either of them. There are other (better) parties to choose from.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A significant difference
Posted by: luckypuck on Jan 7, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Former president Bill Clinton turned around a huge deficit and put our country's books in the black with a huge surplus.

Current president Cheneybush turned around a huge surplus and saddled us and succeeding generations with a huge deficit.

Bill Clinton created more jobs in his first year in office than Bush has done in both terms.

Clinton used lots of diplomacy in his foreign policy and used the military in measured responses to attacks.

Cheneybush used lots of military force, disdained diplomacy (if he even knows what that is)and tricked us into an unnecessary, immoral, illegal pre-emptive all-out war.

Clinton was an unfaithful husband, but faithful to the Constitution.

Cheneybush is a faithful husband, but unfaithful to our Constitution.

Clinton screwed Monica Lewinsky, but Cheneybush is screwing America and apparently wants to screw the rest of the world, too. (I really wanted to use the F word.)

But then, you all know about these.

IMPEACH CHENEYbush!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A significant difference Posted by: anna132
» RE: I have done so Posted by: luckypuck
When oh when ?
Posted by: squire41101 on Jan 8, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do we have to have old and retired Democrats espouse impeachment? McGovern....Ramsey Clark..

Where is the Party Leadership as of today?
Oh yes, Pelosi and Reid....dithering, dithering while precedent after precedent for future dictators is set by the Cheney-Bush cabal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]