Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Ron Paul Can Spoil McCain's Comeback

Posted by Marc Cooper, Huffington Post at 3:23 PM on January 3, 2008.


A strong showing by Paul tonight could severely damage McCain's overall strategy.
ronpaul500px

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Michelle Obama Rallies Women for Barack
Adele M. Stan The Media Consortium

Poll-Watch: Big Convention Bounce for Obama?
Joshua Holland AlterNet

Protesting in the Name of Democracy in the Mile High City
Linda Milazzo CODEPINK Women for Peace: Action Blog

Des Moines, Iowa - GOP presidential candidate John McCain is deeply worried that his resurgent national campaign may be stalled by a relatively strong showing in tonight's Iowa caucuses by the iconoclastic Ron Paul.

The Arizona senator's campaign told the HuffPost that their candidate is concerned that Paul will finish third behind front-runners Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.

McCain, whose campaign floundered earlier in the year, has been showing renewed strength in the battle to win the key New Hampshire primary next week. His national numbers have also been rising and one respected poll now has him in first place..

The McCain campaign also gives former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, currently leading the Iowa Republican polls, little chance of surviving New Hampshire even if he scores a clear victory in tonight's caucuses. The fight for the GOP nomination, McCain strategists believe, should be a head-to-head showdown between McCain and Mitt Romney.

A strong showing by Paul tonight could severely damage McCain's overall strategy. McCain is said to be especially irked because the outsider campaign of the Texas Congressman is given little viability on a national scale. But Paul raised $20 million from his fervent supporters in the last quarter of 2007, enough money to act as a spoiler for more mainstream candidates like McCain.

"Ron Paul's like the Joker in a poker game," said one McCain staffer. Paul reportedly dropped three mailers overnight and kicked his phone banks into turbo-mode in an all-out push to make into the final tier of tonight's winners.

Both McCain and Paul are currently tied at about 10% in most polls of likely Iowa caucus-goers. McCain has not actively campaigned in Iowa and skipped last summer's Republican Straw Poll. His visit to the state today just hours before the caucuses was one of his rare campaign trips here.

As Paul greeted his volunteers this morning at his downtown headquarters, the HuffPost asked for the candidate's reaction to McCain's anger: "I'm so excited. I'm excited he's so upset about me."

Digg!

Tagged as: mccain, paul, iowa

Marc Cooper has covered international and domestic politics for the last three decades. His articles and essays have appeared in dozens of publications ranging from The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Playboy to Rolling Stone, the L.A. Times and the Village Voice.


Michelle Obama Rallies Women for Barack
Michelle: Hillary made my husband a better candidate.
Post by Adele M. Stan. August 28, 2008.
Poll-Watch: Big Convention Bounce for Obama?
Gallup says so.
Post by Joshua Holland. August 28, 2008.
Protesting in the Name of Democracy in the Mile High City
Denver -- your protesters should be greeted with flowers!
Post by Linda Milazzo. August 28, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ron Paul: Liberty, Peace, and Prosperity
Posted by: left_libertarian on Jan 3, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Top three Democrats would increase military spending...

Hillary Clinton:

To help our forces recover from Iraq and prepare them to confront the full range of twenty-first-century threats, I will work to expand and modernize the military so that fighting wars no longer comes at the expense of deployments for long-term deterrence, military readiness, or responses to urgent needs at home.

John Edwards:

I will double the budget for recruitment and raise the standards for the recruitment pool so that we can reduce our reliance on felony waivers and other exceptions. In addition, I will increase our investment in the maintenance of our equipment for the safety of our troops.

Barack Obama:

To renew American leadership in the world, we must immediately begin working to revitalize our military. A strong military is, more than anything, necessary to sustain peace. . . .

We must use this moment both to rebuild our military and to prepare it for the missions of the future. . . . We should expand our ground forces by adding 65,000 soldiers to the army and 27,000 marines. . . .

I will not hesitate to use force, unilaterally if necessary, to protect the American people or our vital interests whenever we are attacked or imminently threatened.

We must also consider using military force in circumstances beyond self-defense in order to provide for the common security that underpins global stability -- to support friends, participate in stability and reconstruction operations, or confront mass atrocities.

http://tinyurl.com/2y4zs8

Don't vote for these war hawks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» VOTE KUCINICH Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» ok, so why paul? Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Ron Paul is for a "strong defense," Edwards wants to cut a bloated military budget
Posted by: Rune on Jan 3, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards does want to put more of the military's budget into practical matters like maintaining the equipment it is wearing out in a hurry and recruiting personnel who are not criminals or aliens, but his overall stance on military spending is that it is wasteful and should be cut.

Meanwhile, many wrongly assume that because Ron Paul is not in favor of using the enormous standing military of the United States to intervene abroad that he favors a small military force. That simply is not so. Ron Paul supports "a strong defense" as one of the few government programs he would not cut. In fact, while Ron Paul would get rid of the IRS, and income tax, the only major program he would cut is the Department of Education, which is why, when you add it all up, Ron Paul's crazy ideas would lead to a more than one trillion dollar deficit. Like I said, his ideas are crazy. Here, have a look for yourself at what a Ron Paul budget might look like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Who?
Posted by: talapuspete on Jan 4, 2008 5:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we can add Ron Paul's name to other great losers like Wm Jennings Bryan. No doubt sincere, just unhinged a tad more than even the voters can handle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]