Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Issues Signing Statement Which Undermines Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 3:07 PM on January 1, 2008.


Hundreds of thousands of people have died in Darfur, and 2.5 million more have been forced to flee their homes.
georgewbush
Bush

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday, President Bush signed the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act, which makes it easier for "states, local governments and private investors to cut investment ties with Sudan as a way to pressure the Khartoum government into ending violence in the country's Darfur region." Both the House and the Senate passed the bill unanimously.

Bush has claimed an intense interest and outrage at the situation in Sudan, going so far as to call killings in Darfur "genocide" in 2005. Yet his signature on the legislation yesterday was accompanied by a signing statement, in which he reserved the right to "overrule" divestment decisions if they conflict with administration foreign policy. The New York Times notes:

But the administration has expressed reservations about the bill, and Mr. Bush's signature was accompanied by a proviso known as a signing statement, in which he said he was reserving the authority to overrule state and local divestment decisions if they conflicted with foreign policy. The statement said the measure "risks being interpreted as insulating" state and local divestment actions from federal oversight.

Unfortunately, the Bush administration's foreign policy hasn't always put pressure on Sudan. In May, the State Department released its 2006 terrorism report, in which it called Sudan a "strong partner in the War on Terror":

The Sudanese government was a strong partner in the War on Terror and aggressively pursued terrorist operations directly involving threats to U.S. interests and personnel in Sudan.

Hundreds of thousands of people have died in Darfur, and 2.5 million more have been forced to flee their homes. Twenty-two states and more than fifty universities have already "passed divestment measures from problematic companies in Sudan."

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, sudan

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Damage freak
Posted by: Staggo on Jan 2, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is committed to causing as much iniquity as possible under the infantile imaginings of a far reaching legacy. Lots of damage has been done by these signing statements, but none of it is irrevocable by necessity. I believe his legacy will last an amazingly short time IF the next president does not hang on to the Bush unitary powers. (Which may not occur, since power is rarely forfeited by the powerful.) More than I fear Bush's transgressions, I fear the president's to come profligacy--even a Democrat's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hitler's "Enabling Law" = Signing Statements
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 2, 2008 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hitler had to have his legislature pass an "Enabling Law" before
he could rule by decree. Signing Statements may accomplish the
same thing as the Enabling Law without bothering to get
Congress's approval. The only cure is immediate impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure, Bush may have said
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jan 2, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, Bush may have said that the mass-killing in Darfur was genocide.
But he didn't say that genocide is a BAD thing!....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nazi without the Uniform - Bush
Posted by: leland61 on Jan 2, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where in the Constitution of the USA or any of its amendments does it say that the President may decide which parts of laws passed by the Congress he will enforce?

It doesn't.

He needs to be impeached and the Congress needs to pass a law that expressly forbids the use of any such instrument to destroy the balance of powers.

The Bush needs to be tired for treason.
Convicted.
Hanged.

To bad we don't do the drawing and quartering any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, leland61
Posted by: thekidde on Jan 2, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought I was the only poster to call for Bush's legal hanging. Keep going, we'll get the bastard yet - right after Cheney, Condi, Rummy, Feith and Wolfowitz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey, leland61 Posted by: fixitt
Hanging is the easy way out
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Jan 2, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for George "we don't torture" bu$h!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]