Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Afghanistan: Still There Between Pakistan and Iran, As Screwed Up As Ever

Posted by Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! at 2:03 PM on January 1, 2008.


Almost everyone thought the US invading Afghanistan was a good idea--everyone, that is, except people who know their Afghan history.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Click for larger version

When I tell people I spent the better part of a year in Afghanistan they assume I was in the military. I'm a bit old for that-- not to mention temperamentally unfit-- and when I mention it was in 1969 and 1971 when I was there, they write it off to eccentricity. I don't purport to be an Afghanistan expert, but recent history will bear out my claims to know a lot more about the place than Bush, his ill-starred regime or the self-serving mooks and clueless imbeciles whose advice the U.S. government has followed.

When the U.S. attacked Afghanistan after 9/11-- a target Rumsfeld and Cheney felt was unworthy of the mighty U.S. military-- almost everyone thought it was, aside from being just, a good idea-- everyone, that is, except people who know their Afghan history... and even more especially, the people who could factor in their knowledge of Afghan history with their knowledge of the Bush Regime's dearth of leadership abilities and monumentally breathtaking incompetence and arrogance (a bad combination).

"Here the for will not meet us in pitched battle, as other armies we have dueled in the past, save under conditions of their choosing. His word is worthless. He routinely violates truces; he betrays the peace. When we defeat him, he will not accept our dominion. He comes back again and again. He hates us with a passion whose depth is exceeded only by his patience and his capacity for suffering. His boys and old men, even his women, fight us as combatants. They do not do this openly, however, but instead present themselves as innocents, even as victims, seeking our aid. When we show compassion, they strike with stealth."

An American politician? No. An American general. Guess again. A Russian general in the 80s? A British general far earlier? No... Alexander the Great addressing Macedonian troops fighting in Afghanistan more than 300 years before Christ. Well, it's actually author Steven Pressfield's version of Alexander in his brilliant and timely (2006) latest book on the history of the ancient world, The Afghan Campaign.

The kind speaks of will-- our own and the enemy's. The foe, he declares, has no chance of overcoming us in the field. But if he can sap our resolution by his doggedness, his relentlessness; if he can appall us by his acts of barbarity, he can, if not defeat us, then prevent us from defeating him. Our will must master the enemy's. Our resolve must out last his.

It's never gonna happen. The Macedonians couldn't pull it off-- and their leader was brilliant, heroic, charismatic and beloved, as well as mortal-- nor did the Russians or Brits or anyone else who tried, at least not for the long run. Bush's resolve and will? The American people's? Hillary Clinton's? Mullah Omar and his boys aren't going anywhere. How many Americans could point out Afghanistan on a map-- even with my clue in the title... even if their life depended on it?

The following is neither an American nor a Russian; it's Pressfield's Alexander rallying his people again:

The types of operations we are now compelled to wage; methods of pursuit, of capture and interrogation; the treatment of so-called non-combatants; all actions we take in this theater-- these are war too. Are you are warriors who must perform these acts.

Those who don't know history are condemned to repeat it. Someone should have grilled Bush on what he learned in Yale, instead of speculating on whether he or Al Gore would have been more fun to have a beer with.

"The instrument of counterguerilla warfare is the massacre. Its object is terror, to make oneself an object of such dread that the foe fears to face you ever. This practice has worked for the army of Macedon across all Asia. It does not work here. The Afghan is so proud, so inured to privation, and so in love with liberty that he prefers death to capitulation."

Americans were once that in love with liberty as well-- which is how we kicked the British imperialist dogs out of our original 13 states. Now we're in love with comfort and safety and would exchange liberty for the chimera of security offered by avaricious political manipulators.

Digg!

Tagged as: afghanistan, pakistan, middle east

Howie Klein is the creator of the blog Down With Tyranny!


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don't
Posted by: Staggo on Jan 2, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of my utter dislike for Bush/Cheney and their policies and incompetence, I recommend that AlterNet not take pulp fiction as worthy contemporary commentary, or at least not this work of low quality fiction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't Posted by: hilaryuk
A+
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 2, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Howie Klein is correct. 100%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Herion Crops Haven't Been this Good Since......
Posted by: tommy1957 on Jan 2, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to our intervention in Afghanistan; the US and Europe will see no shortage of Heroin this year, and perhaps for the next decade or two. Yes the Taliban were harder on the poppy growers than the Karzi administration. Of course they actually had a little bit more control over the country. President Karzi who controls only the Kandahar region (his native homeland) dare not go out in public because of the threat of assassination. I am somewhat suspicious that the CIA may have a hand in the bumper crops; we all know they like to use drugs to profit illegally to carry out clandestine activities. We all remember the “Crack for Contras” (an Ollie North NSA/CIA production). And the recent revelation about a CIA jet that crashed in Mexico with a whole lot of coca cola (cocaine) on board. I find it somewhat ironic that this current administration is so hard on drugs (at least for appearances) when it’s CIA is profiting from higher drug prices. Or is that the plan? Higher prices; more profits. I guess they are smarter than they look (sometimes).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Those who refuse to learn from history...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jan 3, 2008 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... are dammed to repeat it!

the points made on this article, be it fact, fantasy or fiction are excellent points but makes me wonder... why are we still over there?
[please don't say "we're fighting over there so we don't have to fight them over here" BS]
Compassion is a good thing!
but I never thought of a thing called "military compassion" before!

Bush [heaven forbid] actually said it best...
if your not with us your against us...
unfortunately his competence in leadership since then has been completely predictable...

the focus on getting the criminals responsible for 9-11 has been completely lost...
[satire mode engaged] ...the good thing though is that we have the bad guys [Iran] completely encircled now with the capitulation of Iraq and Afghanistan... [well sorta]...[satire mode disengage]

which leads me to ask the simple questions [yet again]
why are we still in Afghanistan? and
why did we go into Iraq?

more importantly!!!
Why are we once again doomed to repeat dismally failure prone concept wars?
["war on drugs" 'ala "war on terror"]

wasn't 9-11 was a criminal act?
and shouldn't it have been prosecuted by policing authorities [National & International]
Failing that, if it's finally decided to bring in the military...
should it not have been used as a crushing and mind numbing example to all fun-da-mental-ists everywhere... [be they religious or political fun-da-mental-ists]
Once done, the job completed... you then pull out and leave them with the memory that if you fuck with us... this is what happens! [an international lamendation to extremists everywhere]

since 9-11 the world to me seems to be in chaos,
and with bin-Laden's campaign for fundamentalist worldwide rule clearly a winner...
[with Xenophobic Christian Neo-cons being the policy dreamers in DC, Neo-con orthodox Judaic morons being the preeminate policy makers in jewis-lam and the redneck whahabi-shia brotherhood fanatics running the Islamic freak show...
Where's the moderates.. the ordinary folks that have to live in the wake of this madness and why, were/are they shut out of the process?

Thank you George for your inspirational leadership of the FREE world...
may you die the death of a thousand papercuts

ohhh... what webs we weave...
for future generations to weep!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]