Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hillary's Final Strategy: Be Afraid

Posted by Marc Cooper, Huffington Post at 8:07 AM on December 30, 2007.


Barack Obama and John Edwards might want to change the world. But Hillary Clinton wants to protect you against it.
070112hillaryvmed7a.widec
Clinton

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Eldridge, Iowa - Barack Obama and John Edwards might want to change the world. But Hillary Clinton wants to protect you against it.

That's the unmistakable message that Senator Clinton is pounding out in this final phase of the campaign to capture the Iowa caucuses. In a world brimming with danger and uncertainty, she argues as she blitzes the Hawkeye State, there's no time to waste daydreaming about pie-in-the-sky promises of reform.

Instead, the American people must choose a leader ready to immediately start fixing the problems that already exist and one who is immediately ready to face the inevitable and "unpredictable" crises looming right over the horizon. And that would be Clinton.

"We know some of the challenges that await the next president," Clinton told a packed crowd at a junior high school Saturday morning. "But no matter how much we know, we can't possibly anticipate all the problems."

The razzamatazz cheerleading, sloganeering style that punctuated her earlier campaign events has now been replaced by a sedate, somber, even grave tone coming from the podium. Clinton never raised her voice, never elevated the mood, and at times sounded like a concerned, responsible parent telling the kids that something terrible was taking place outside the door but not to worry because Mom and Dad - or in this case Hill and Bill- would take care of it.

Becoming president, she said in a hushed tone, is "an awesome responsibility. And it was thrown into relief with the events last Thursday with the assassination of Benazir Bhutto."

"When that person gets into the Oval Office," she said, referring to the next president, "there will be a stack of problems already waiting: a war, another war to resolve, an economy that is faltering, housing values that have dropped 6% in some parts of the country...all of those millions, 47 million of them uninsured."

As is now customary among her leading rivals, Clinton didn't utter the words Obama or Edwards - the two candidates now in a dogfight for the mantle of change- but she drew a bright shining line between her position and theirs. They are the dreamers. She is the doer. All three are locked in a dead heat to win next Thursday's first-in-the-nation caucus.

"Everybody running is talking about change," Clinton said, sporting a royal blue blazer over black slacks. "Some people think you bring change by demanding it," she said, referring to Edwards. "Some people think you bring it by hoping for it," she continued in a clear reference to Obama. "And some people think you bring it by working very, very hard everyday. And that's what I've been doing for 35 years."

Even the name of this last-minute, multi-stop, week-long closing swing through Iowa carries the ultra-utilitarian title of "Big Problems, Real Solutions - Time to Pick a President."

Clinton's pragmatic pitch was well-received by the disproportionately elderly audience. And while Obama rallies are fueled with hard rock and Edwards events incline toward country fare, Clinton's rally was preceded by a performance by an accordion-led trio playing the U.S. Marine Corps hymn.

"I went to see Obama give a speech last night and he was inspiring," said Louise Mooney, a Maryland physician volunteering for the Clinton Iowa campaign and who attended Saturday's rally. "Obama is more conceptual. But Hillary's more of a leader, she's more nitty-gritty, more X-Y-Z."

While Clinton has been chided by her rivals for representing the past, she unabashedly touted the "1990s as a time of jobs and prosperity," and joked that "the 90s aren't exactly ancient history." She lauded the accomplishments of the Clinton administration including the 1996 abolition of the federal welfare safety net saying, "You know, the best way to help somebody is prepare them to get a job."

Much as her husband often did as a sitting president, she eschewed any sweeping promises of radical change and, instead, ticked off a long list of bite-sized program applets she would tackle as president: increased Pell grants, expanded tax credits for college tuition, and universal day care for 4 year olds. "And I'm going to eliminate those financial aid forms that parents have to fill out that take hours and hours," she promised.

"The economy was in great shape when her husband was in office," said a woman supporter in a green union T-shirt. "I think she learned a lot from him."

Digg!

Tagged as: democrats, clinton, obama, edwards, iowa

Marc Cooper has covered international and domestic politics for the last three decades. His articles and essays have appeared in dozens of publications ranging from The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Playboy to Rolling Stone, the L.A. Times and the Village Voice.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As a "doer" Clinton ought to do her homework
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 30, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Senate, before voting in favor of the resolution giving Bush the power to go to war with Iraq, Clinton had the choice to do her homework in the form of reading the classified NIE document on Iraq.

She did not.

Of the half dozen Senators who took the time to do their homework, none of them voted in favor of the Iraq war resolution.

If her opponents are dreamers and she is a doer why did she fail to do her homework that day and in turn help enter us into a BS war with Iraq?

What a bunch of marketing, public relations, BS.

I'd take a dreamer over a phony constructed doer anyday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Edwards? Independence? Posted by: photon's feather
» Oh, yes? Since when? Posted by: photon's feather
afraid?
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 30, 2007 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we aren't scared of your boogeyman anymore than we were afraid of bushco's. move on,you are wrong,wrong,wrong for the job

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: afraid? Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: afraid? Posted by: mejsmith
outrider
Posted by: outrider on Dec 30, 2007 6:41 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FIRST THINGS FIRST

Edwards and Obama are medicine men in the most traditional sense of the words. I do not trust either of them because each is trying to sell an elixir, a cure-all, a panacea that is just as liable to kill as it is to cure. Further more they cannot produce their concoctions unless Congress cooperates and enacts the necessary lesislation. There is no guarantee that Congress will cooperate. Even if Congress cooperated there is no assurance, no record, to show that either could convince our allies, if we have any, or are enemies that he is for real. Senator Clinton may not be perfect but she is the best for the job. A Clinton-Richardson ticket could easily defeat any combination the Republicans put up. That is a necessary condition for restoration of a Constitutional government. We need a team that has experience across the spectrum, domestic and foreign relations, candidates who are proven winners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: outrider Posted by: MalloryJustMallory
» RE: outrider Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: outrider Posted by: mejsmith
» Nonsense! Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Nonsense! Posted by: Lauren
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» See what I mean Bibsi???? Posted by: Prophit
» Where do you get your misinformation? Posted by: photon's feather
Marc Cooper!!! Alternet hits the bottom of the barrel
Posted by: johnp on Dec 30, 2007 7:03 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew that Alternet was anxious to hurt Hillary's campaign, and to give more red meat to the Hillary haters, sweating away at the prospect that the "devil" may win the election.
But to resort to Marc Cooper, the impish Clinton hater, par excellence, leaves them groveling at the bottom of the trash heap. Cooper has made a reputation posing as a leftist, but actually driven by a seething, all consuming hatred, actually the profoundest jealousy, of Bill Clinton, and anything associated with his name, including his wife; a hatred and jealousy, that only requires a glance at this creature, to understand its origin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is what you get with Hillary ...
Posted by: TarryFaster on Dec 30, 2007 7:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
click here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Been working hard for 35 years? Time to retire!
Posted by: alternetrose on Dec 30, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Becoming president, she said in a hushed tone, is "an awesome responsibility," similar to what we hear when Bush complains, "being President is a hard job!" They are both whiners; not doers - at least not leaders who "do" for the people!

She said, "Some people think you bring change by demanding it," "Some people think you bring it by hoping for it... "And some people think you bring it by working very, very hard everyday. And that's what I've been doing for 35 years."

Well sister Hil, if the mess we're in today is an example of all that hard work you've been sooooo busy doing, American's are REALLY crazy if they let you keep working!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Esther Murdoch
Posted by: Truelass on Dec 30, 2007 8:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary Clinton is a very dangerous woman and should not be considered as a credible candidate for high office. She straddles the horse with one stirup kicking left and the other kicking right whichever suits her anti union or anti big business mood that day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sther Murdoch Posted by: Bibsi
What is there left to say?
Posted by: johnp on Dec 30, 2007 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we approach the nomination, I sit, having read this complaint of Cooper's regarding the "fear" he thinks Sen. Clinton is trying to put in us, in breathtaking astonishment.
After nearly 8 years where a lunatic has been doing nothing but creating and fomenting fear in the population, Hillary is faulted for seeming to do it once, as a campaigner. What is there left to say? It's old news. The Hillary haters are as incorrigible as Marc Cooper, hopelessly searching, pleading, for something, anything to say against the Clintons. What a pathetic sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is there left to say? Posted by: papananook
Thank you, Prophit
Posted by: papananook on Dec 30, 2007 11:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....for taking on these blind Hillary kool-aid drinkers.
If she is nominated, I will write in Kucinich or Edwards...I would NEVER vote for an arrogant corporate shill like her.
If Bibsi and her like-"minded" Hillary supporters would actually do some research without the kool-aid high, they would easily find who is behind her...and it ain't the poor, the uninsured, the elderly who need medicine...Hillary is no more progressive than any other bought-and-sold politician.
Go to bed now Bibsi and dream of a new Amurrika!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hate her all you want; but be ready to wipe the shit off your face
Posted by: xbj on Dec 30, 2007 11:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, have lots of tissues ready. She has a lot of surprises for all of you, and even though they'll be pleasant, you'll hate them all because she'll be doing everything that's right on.

America gets it. You Clinton haters never will. Least of all take responsibility for putting Bush in office. I find it hilarious how one can all of a sudden be a Bush hater and Clinton hater in the same breath, when BushCo clearly tried to assassinate the Clintons. And how Bush would never have been elected without completely irrational hatred of the Clintons and all they accomplished.

Just doesn't make sense, but then your irrationality never does and never will.

Just have lots of tissues ready. Unless of course you ENJOY having shit all over your face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We "Clinton-haters" are America Posted by: photon's feather
» DEFEATISM!! Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: DEFEATISM!! Posted by: xbj
» RE: off your face Posted by: Lauren
» RE: off your face Posted by: xbj
This is the problem, gang...
Posted by: riley on Dec 31, 2007 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just read through the remarks here and you must see how polarizing Mrs. Clinton is. Now magnify that by about 100 to imagine the easy, easy target she will make for the far right and the never-ending radio talk show hosts. There are no really good choices in either political party, and whoever gets the job next is not only going to inherit the absolute mess Bush has left behind, he or she is more than likely going to have to take the blame for the inevitable economic collapse that most international financial articles are predicting. I don't know why any sane person would want the job. But I do know that, here in the South, neither Hillary nor Obama will be able to be successful. The Huckabee or Romney campaigns will appeal to red-meat conservative evangelical furor and neither Democrat will be able to handle the abortion, prayer in the public schools, evolution, scientific knowledge mantra that is preached down here. It's as though the Enlightenment never happened and the religious test has to be passed. Edwards is not much better on this turf. The radicals wish to portray him as gay or an absolute wuss. This country is in serious, serious trouble, and neither political party is addressing the bare-bones issues that threaten us. Nope. I've read the Clinton record. Won't be voting for her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Hils Supporters are any indication
Posted by: tkwilson on Dec 31, 2007 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of who she is and what she'll do in Washington; we really are hosed.
One thing we don't need is more government and more government intervention, anywhere. Everything the government does it does at gunpoint. It has to. Remember that.
Everything from traffic tickets to taxes to drug wars to regime change.

I've only heard a couple candidates offer to restore constitutional law if elected, and they're no where near the top of the "polls".
Hillary wasn't one of them.

I got pimped by the Clintons once (Bills first term; yes I voted for him). As it turned out there wasn't much change between George 1, Bill, and George 2.
Neo Liberal or Neo Con looks pretty much the same. Hils roots and her solutions are planted firmly in the same mess as her husband and all their CFR buddies.

Oh; and apparently Alternet will tolerate a lot more garbage than they say they will, but you all just carry on, as you were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Self-satisfied rich folk
Posted by: alternet reader Dan on Dec 31, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the breakfast area of a Keene NH hotel this morning, I ran into a small crowd of "Hillary People." They all had their little micro-notebooks, checking the latest polls and buzzwords. They also had a little white lap-dog, who was nosing around for scraps under their table. I don't think the hotel really promotes bringing your animals into the public breakfast area, but these folks were clearly too important (at least in their own minds) to care about their fellow guests. Oh, and of course they didn't bother cleaning up after themselves when they were done, they just picked up their expensive gear and walked off to their strategy meetings. An indication, if anyone still needs one, that Democrats are just Republicans who weren't invited to the party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Self-satisfied rich folk
Posted by: alternet reader Dan on Dec 31, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the breakfast area of a Keene NH hotel this morning, I ran into a small crowd of "Hillary People." They all had their little micro-notebooks, checking the latest polls and buzzwords. They also had a little white lap-dog, who was nosing around for scraps under their table. I don't think the hotel really promotes bringing your animals into the public breakfast area, but these folks were clearly too important (at least in their own minds) to care about their fellow guests. Oh, and of course they didn't bother cleaning up after themselves when they were done, they just picked up their expensive gear and walked off to their strategy meetings. An indication, if anyone still needs one, that these Democrats are just Republicans who weren't invited to the party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE:XJB.......
Posted by: anna132 on Dec 31, 2007 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grow up, get a clue, read about your "CORRUPT" MRS.CLINTON before you speak and wake up.







PEACE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton-Bush ties
Posted by: photon's feather on Dec 31, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I have posted in the past: Clinton (I) gave Bush I a pass; and Clinton II (should we be so unfortunate) would do the same for Bush II. These are dyed-in-the-wool back-room dealing politicians.

Simply calling yourself a Democrat doesn't make you one. (Anyone here not familiar with a neocon in Democrat's clothing named Lieberman?)

My apologies, readers:

Still trying to figure out how these links work - and it doesn't help that:
a) they work differently on every site; and
b) the (hoped-for) link doesn't show in the edit window at this site. (At least, what I typed doesn't show.)

Just in case:

http://consortiumnews.com/2007/123107.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP Fear in a Dem package
Posted by: krayeski on Dec 31, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article quotes Hillary as saying there is "a war and another war to resolve"

Does she know something we don't?

Wishful thinking on her part? Since she voted to consider Iranian forces a terrorist organization?

Or will we now head to Pakistan as a diversion from the mess in Iraq?

Yet another industrial military complex candidate. How many more of these people can our country, constitution and planet survive?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mick3 Posted by: xbj
» RE: mick3 Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: mick3 Posted by: xbj
» RE: mick3 Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: mick3 Posted by: xbj
krazycat
Posted by: krazycat on Jan 5, 2008 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone in washington needs to look
for something else to do, We need change, And we need only one person to do it, His name is RON PAUL,
We have no hope without him.
He is against the New World Order,
You should be to, Unless you want to be a slave.
GOD bless
Rob

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]