Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pakistan’s Bhutto Assassinated

Posted by Chris Bowers, Open Left at 10:21 AM on December 27, 2007.


We don't really seem to care if Pakistan is democratic, as long as it's stable. Oh wait, stable countries don't see opposition leaders assassinated...
abhutto1
Bhutto

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This seems bad for Pakistan:

An attack on a political rally killed the Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto near the capital, Islamabad, Thursday. Witnesses said Ms. Bhutto was fired upon at close range before the blast, and an official from her party said Ms. Bhutto was further injured by the explosion, which was apparently caused by a suicide attacker.

Ms. Bhutto was declared dead by doctors at a hospital in Rawalpindi at 6:16 p.m. after the doctors had tried to resuscitate her for thirty-five minutes. She had shrapnel injuries, the doctors said. At least a dozen more people were killed in the attack.

I don't have a huge amount to say about this tragedy, except that I am sure it will be spun as good for Republicans in some way. The tiger attack at the zoo was also good for Republicans, I imagine.

Oh wait, I do have one thing to say about this. I guess this surge didn't work:

The US is seeking to beef up Pakistan's counter-insurgency efforts in the tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan by expanding an American special forces team in the country to train the Frontier Corps and recruiting local militias to take on the insurgents.

The aim is to replicate the Iraq model, in which the Americans recruited, financed and armed local militias against insurgents, firstly in Anbar province and then elsewhere in the country.

Or maybe it did work, since we don't really seem to care if Pakistan is democratic, as long as it is stable. Oh wait-stable countries don't see opposition leaders assassinated...

UPDATE from Paddy @ Cliff Schecter's blog: '08 Presidential Hopefuls React To Bhutto Assasination

Joe S already said this morning on MSNBC that "this is good for Rudy". And now Chris Cillizza is semi-agreeing. Ugh.

The former New York mayor, who was in charge of the city when terrorists struck on Sept. 11, 2001, called the assassination a "tragic event for Pakistan and for democracy in Pakistan."

"Her murderers must be brought to justice, and Pakistan must continue the path back to democracy and the rule of law," Giuliani said in a statement. "Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere - whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi - is an enemy of freedom. We must redouble our efforts to win the terrorists' war on us."

Huck?

Republican candidate Mike Huckabee called the turn of event "devastating news for the people of Pakistan, and my prayers go out to them."

"The terrible violence surrounding Pakistan's upcoming election stands in stark contrast to the peaceful transition of power that we embrace in our country through our Constitution," Huckabee said in a statement. "On this sad day, we are reminded that while our democracy has flaws, it stands as a shining beacon of hope for nations and people around the world who seek peace and opportunity through self-government."

Obama-

Democratic Sen. Barack Obama just issued this statement: "I am shocked and saddened by the death of Benazir Bhutto in this terrorist atrocity. She was a respected and resilient advocate for the democratic aspirations of the Pakistani people. We join with them in mourning her loss, and stand with them in their quest for democracy and against the terrorists who threaten the common security of the world."

Digg!

Tagged as: pakistan, bhutto

Chris Bowers was a full-time editor at MyDD from May 2004 until June 2007. Some of his projects have included the creation of the Liberal Blog Advertising Network, the first scientifically random poll of progressive netroots activists, the Use It Or Lose It campaign, the nation's most accurate forecast of Democratic house pickups in 2006, and the 2006 Googlebomb the Elections campaign.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bad news for freedom fighters.
Posted by: MamaPantz on Dec 27, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This SEEMS bad for Pakistan? Uhh Yeah! I'd say for SURE it's bad for Pakistan. And for anyone else in the world that believes people should have a say in the way they are governed. She was the person that could make her country stronger, by empowering the people and giving them hope that their voices would be heard. But now they've been silenced. All of us have. You didn't have to live in Pakistan to be inspired by this woman. She was fiercely dedicated to fighting for freedom and democracy and justice; she would die for it. Yes this IS bad for Pakistan, and it's bad for all of us. America could end up like this if we let it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What??????????? Posted by: pig
Bhutto killing has the US fingerprints all over it
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Dec 27, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember Jack Kennedy? How about Bobby? Dr. King? Abbie Hoffman? How about the guy Dick Cheney shot in the face?
I'm sorry but the was a 'hit' plain and simple. It happened in a part of the country that we have the most influence in and are trying to get even more support from,via the opium trade. This woman was a Peacsmaker,she wanted the Taliban and other militant groups out of her Country and called down it's corrupted Leader Musharrif for not doing all he could to get the job done. So we helped get done what can't be done in America. We helped wack the opposition candidate. Even though a Tommy Thompson supported tried to run me down and kill my wife while I ran a 'true grassroots' campaign for Governor. Even I knew I had a snoballs chance in hell of winning the election, at least I was content with the fact that I could educate folks about the serious problems with the environment,healthcare,and total mismanagement of State funds.
In Afghanistan it's much easier to qwell an opposition by simply killing it. That's democracy by bullets. We just rig election here. Right down to the actual party that wins. Every step is so far outside 'democracy' the 'Founding Fathers' genocidal maniacs themselves, would still call for a revolt for their running of the Nation.
Just in saying this I know there will be more DHS monitors put on my phone,more drive by's, more 'watching'. Why? I stick up for poor people,people of color,the sick,the Elderly,the Environment,the land rights of the First Americans, and stand up for the tarring and feathering of ALL politicians. Neither party is worth the time it takes to have a bowel movement and as long as we keep supporting puppet governments,ours or any others,then they are'nt worth even that. If,as a Nation, we don't take a stand and remove this scum from Office and end our corrupted form of foriegn policy,then we are no better.
Jeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was a matter of time.
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 27, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She must have known it was a matter of time when she returned to Pakistan.

So, who was it? Islamic Extremists or Musharraf?

Let's think. The extremists hated her because she was their sworn enemy, and vowed a war on them. There she was, a woman, supposed to be subservient to any male in the vicinity instead of showing them all up shooting her mouth off about things that aren't a woman's concern. And crime of crimes, she kept on forgetting not to shake hands with men after she was married. They hated her, but did they take her seriously as a threat? Did they kill her? I'm going to say no. I think they would have just chopped off the offending hands to make an example.

The man extremists truly hate is Ashfaq Kayani, the hand-picked, US-trained general who, as of November, is in the most important seat of power in Pakistan--he's the Chief of Army Staff. He has a long record of "disappearing" civilians out of their homes, and is presently doing Bush's bidding in the Waziristans by exterminating Taliban, their family and friends.

So, Musharraf. There she was, speaking in front of crowds about real democracy, not the kind where a man gets rid of the judiciary in order to become a "popularly elected leader". His popular support? Ten billion bucks worth of guns courtesy of W, ready to keep Pakistan safe for the Pakistanis (which ones?).

Bhutto was making it a little difficult for him to re-invent himself as the People's Choice. The people, it seems, could see the uniform under the suit, and if there was a real election....

So the civil war that's coming is just Musharraf's thing. Who knows how to deal with such chaos better than he does? Never mind all the claptrap speechifying, vote-winning, hand-shaking that goes into an election. Ten billion bucks worth of guns is very handy in keeping order.

Is there even going to be an election, now? And do you think Bushco even gives a fuck? They're watching Iowa today, not Islamabad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was a matter of time.
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 27, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She must have known it was a matter of time when she returned to Pakistan.

So, who was it? Islamic Extremists or Musharraf?

Let's think. The extremists hated her because she was their sworn enemy, and vowed a war on them. There she was, a woman, supposed to be subservient to any male in the vicinity instead of showing them all up shooting her mouth off about things that aren't a woman's concern. And crime of crimes, she kept on forgetting not to shake hands with men after she was married. They hated her, but did they take her seriously as a threat? Did they kill her? I'm going to say no. I think they would have just chopped off the offending hands to make an example.

The man extremists truly hate is Ashfaq Kayani, the hand-picked, US-trained general who, as of November, is in the most important seat of power in Pakistan--he's the Chief of Army Staff. He has a long record of "disappearing" civilians out of their homes, and is presently doing Bush's bidding in the Waziristans by exterminating Taliban, their family and friends.

So, Musharraf. There she was, speaking in front of crowds about real democracy, not the kind where a man gets rid of the judiciary in order to become a "popularly elected leader". His popular support? Ten billion bucks worth of guns courtesy of W, ready to keep Pakistan safe for the Pakistanis (which ones?).

Bhutto was making it a little difficult for him to re-invent himself as the People's Choice. The people, it seems, could see the uniform under the suit, and if there was a real election....

So the civil war that's coming is just Musharraf's thing. Who knows how to deal with such chaos better than he does? Never mind all the claptrap speechifying, vote-winning, hand-shaking that goes into an election. Ten billion bucks worth of guns is very handy in keeping order.

Is there even going to be an election, now? And do you think Bushco even gives a fuck? They're watching Iowa today, not Islamabad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was a matter of time.
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 27, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She must have known it was a matter of time when she returned to Pakistan.

So, who was it? Islamic Extremists or Musharraf?

Let's think. The extremists hated her because she was their sworn enemy, and vowed a war on them. There she was, a woman, supposed to be subservient to any male in the vicinity instead of showing them all up shooting her mouth off about things that aren't a woman's concern. And crime of crimes, she kept on forgetting not to shake hands with men after she was married. They hated her, but did they take her seriously as a threat? Did they kill her? I'm going to say no. I think they would have just chopped off the offending hands to make an example.

The man extremists truly hate is Ashfaq Kayani, the hand-picked, US-trained general who, as of November, is in the most important seat of power in Pakistan--he's the Chief of Army Staff. He has a long record of "disappearing" civilians out of their homes, and is presently doing Bush's bidding in the Waziristans by exterminating Taliban, their family and friends.

So, Musharraf. There she was, speaking in front of crowds about real democracy, not the kind where a man gets rid of the judiciary in order to become a "popularly elected leader". His popular support? Ten billion bucks worth of guns courtesy of W, ready to keep Pakistan safe for the Pakistanis (which ones?).

Bhutto was making it a little difficult for him to re-invent himself as the People's Choice. The people, it seems, could see the uniform under the suit, and if there was a real election....

So the civil war that's coming is just Musharraf's thing. Who knows how to deal with such chaos better than he does? Never mind all the claptrap speechifying, vote-winning, hand-shaking that goes into an election. Ten billion bucks worth of guns is very handy in keeping order.

Is there even going to be an election, now? And do you think Bushco even gives a fuck? They're watching Iowa today, not Islamabad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG! Sorry!
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 27, 2007 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was getting a "we can't do this" screen when I went to post the comment!

Maybe a kindly administrator can delete a few of the extras.

Thanks for your patience!

Longdream

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I bet bu$h is watching this closely
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Dec 28, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and taking notes! Hmmm, how can I hold onto power? national emmergency, cancel elections? Get rid of the oppositiion? Hhhhmmmm...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]