Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Revealed! Who George Bush Supports for the GOP Nomination

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 4:01 AM on December 26, 2007.


It's really not that hard to figure out...
bushpraying12

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

GOP candidates have distanced themselves from George W. Bush. Who can blame them? With a 24% approval rating, the man is radioactive to anyone who would like to succeed him. But that brings a question to mind - which GOP hopeful does George Bush support - and why? It's really not that hard to figure out...

In a news conference last week, George Bush stated that he won't "start commenting about the [GOP] primaries." Small wonder. None of the GOP presidential candidates will comment about George Bush, either, and it doesn't take a political genius to figure out why none of the candidates will invoke the name of the least popular president in U.S. history. The guy is simply radioactive to any serious candidate who wants the Republican nomination.

So, ok. Bush won't publicly name his own favorite. Fair enough. By process of elimination, we can winnow down the field of candidates who Bush wouldn't support (and why), and in doing that, arrive at a conclusion as to who he does favor.

Mitt Romney: Mormon. Bush has stylized himself as an evangelical Christian. As I've previously noted, evangelicals view the Mormon religion as a cult. George Bush would not support Mitt, even though Mitt hearts Gitmo and most of Bush's war policies.

Ron Paul: Wants to get out of Iraq immediately. Likes the Constitution. Is against globalization. It doesn't matter that his anti-tax, pro-family, anti-abortion rhetoric would play well with Bush's base, because the first three attributes listed above are immediate deal-breakers.

John McCain: Bush has had a love-hate relationship with St. McCain since, well, forever. The "hate" part of the relationship hasn't stopped McCain from embracing Bush whenever necessary, but I think that we can reasonably assume that even Bush feels McCain is little more than a GOP suck-up. Plus, there's that Vietnam and torture thing. Bush likes torture porn. McCain has starred in the films. No way that Bush ever goes public in support of John McCain.

Fred Thompson: Bush goes to bed at 9PM, and (most likely) never watched Law and Order. Doubtful that Bush knows much about Thompson, other than "he's that guy on TV". It's hard to imagine George Bush pulling the lever for Grandpa Fred.

Mike Huckabee: On the surface, Huck would appear to be the candidate who best matches up with Bush's own sketchy background. However, long-time Bush confidante Peter Wehner came out strongly against Huckabee in a WaPo op-ed. If Wehner is giving Huck the thumbs down, so is Bush.

And that leaves us with...

Rudy Giuliani: If George Bush had to pick a horse in the GOP race, his mount would be named Rudy. Giuliani is nothing but a cardboard cutout of George W. Bush; all hat, no cattle. In fact, it's starting to look like Rudy doesn't even have a hat. Financial skullduggery and pecker problems while mayor of NYC? No problemo for AWOL Bush, because Rudy stood on the pile with Bush, and Mr. 24% looked deep into Rudy's eyes and read his soul - kinda like he did with Vladmir Putin, Nouri al-Maliki, and most members of the House of Saud.

There ya have it. By process of elimination, we've determined who George Bush would prefer as the GOP candidate. With Tancredo, Hunter, and Brownback out of the race (I think Brownback was probably Bush's early favorite), there's only one candidate who is enough like Bush himself for Bush to support.

And, just another reason why Rudy Giuliani will never, ever become the next President of the United States.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, paul, huckabee, giuliani, romney, mccain, thompson

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


White House Refuses to Deny Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who actually really cares what The Texas Turd Thinks?
Posted by: Sissy on Dec 26, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's all Rudy needs as his polls continue to sink, the endorsement of The Texas Turd. What's more, I question if "W" has given much thought to the elections next year. He is so disengaged at every level that I betcha he doesn't even remember that we're FINALLY on the countdown with this gawdforsaken administration.

No, I doubt very much that if Rudy is indeed W's "choice, he will ask him to come help on the campaign trail...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush for Bloomberg
Posted by: Gaubladt on Dec 26, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You left out Bloomberg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Still Think Bush's Best Buddies
Posted by: magistre on Dec 26, 2007 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Supreme Court (you know, the people that put him in office in 2000) will rule "Term Limitations" un-Constitutional! But if he has to step down and annoint someone else it may as well be his old partner-in-crime (9/11) Rudolph.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Repubs...
Posted by: Bbear41 on Dec 26, 2007 3:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Stole three of the last four national elections. I expect that will recover from their '06 stumble. Rudy 9/11 will be the next president. The trend toward 'Unitary Executive,' one party rule will continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's Pioneers & Neocons & Theocons are behind all the Republican candidates
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Dec 26, 2007 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
except whacky Ron Paul, who despite his libertarian truth telling, opposes a woman's right to choose among other inconsistently nonlibertarian conveniently Republican rigid positions.

Romney is heavily backed financially by the Bush Pioneer corporate fundraisers and has Blackwater execs as his advisors, Guiliani has a whole slew of Neocons on board for his police state domestic and empire foreign policy positions, and McCain has some Neocon and Pioneer backing. Huckabee has plenty of RW extremist and theocon backing as well.

The only candidate Bush favors is himself or his brother, outside of the Bush Crime Family, the rest of the Rethug lineup intends to continue his policies, so really he owns them. If he didn't they'd be falling all over themselves to repudiate and ensure they'd do radically different policies. And they have not, they have embraced his criminal infrastructure.

So really, this article is misleading fluff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want to see the idiot chimp and his rethug administration
Posted by: johngary66 on Dec 26, 2007 11:05 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go to trial somewhere. ron paul has proposed laws that would prevent them form going before a world court. These are of course from the Congressional Record.
these are ron paul proposals.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND MILITARY ISSUES

-- This "champion of peace" wanted to prohibit the dismantling of ICBM silos in the U.S.:

H.R.1665: To prohibit the destruction during fiscal year 2002 of intercontinental ballistic missile silos in the United States.

H.R.3769: To prohibit the destruction during fiscal year 2001 of intercontinental ballistic missile silos in the United States.

-- He would continue U.S. opposition to the International Criminal Court, despite the usefulness of this body for prosecuting war-crimes that are not challenged domestically.

H.R.1154: To provide that the International Criminal Court is not valid with respect to the United States, and for other purposes.

H.AMDT.480 (A010): An amendment numbered 9 printed in part A of House Report 107-450 to prohibit funds authorized in the bill from being used to assist, cooperate with, or provide any support to the International Criminal Court.

H.R.4169: To provide that the International Criminal Court is not valid with respect to the United States, and for other purposes.

H.CON.RES.23: Expressing the sense of the Congress that President George W. Bush should declare to all nations that the United States does not intend to assent to or ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty, also referred to as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and the signature of former President Clinton to that treaty should not be construed otherwise.

H.RES.416: Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the International Criminal Court.

-- He has promoted the Bricker Amendment to the Constitution, and otherwise sought to limit the protections of the international law. He would also prohibit U.S. courts from citing foreign laws or policies (other than English ones) in their decisions:

H.J.RES.1028: A resolution proposing the Bricker amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to force and effect of treaties and executive agreements.

H.J.RES.492: A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to force and effect of treaties and Executive agreements.

H.CON.RES.49: Expressing the sense of Congress that the Treaty Power of the President does not extend beyond the enumerated powers of the Federal Government, but are limited by the Constitution, and any exercise of such Executive Power inconsistent with the Constitution shall be of no legal force or effect.

H.R.4118: To ensure that the courts interpret the Constitution in the manner that the Framers intended.
I guess he really is just another rethug!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Decider
Posted by: QQOblivion on Dec 27, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll tell you exactly how to tell who Bush supports for the presidential nomination (of both major parties).
See who is nominated.
What do I mean? Well, since Bush and his buds are the Illuminati for our generation, the votes of the American people in the elections mean nothing -- only the hand-picked choice of "The Decider" is what is actually important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]