Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

9-Year-Old Banned from Christmas Party "Because He Didn't Believe in Jesus"

Posted by Paddy , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 5:18 AM on December 22, 2007.


Sounds like someone got a bug in their saddle over the fact the family was "non-religious" and decided to be a Grinch.
stewartbros468x367
9 year old boy

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The "War On Christmas" gone bad.

Teachers banned a nine-year-old boy from his class Christmas party because his parents had barred him from RE (ed note- religious education) lessons.

Douglas Stewart was forced to stay at home while his friends received presents from Santa and tucked into ice cream and jelly.

His parents were told he was not welcome at the celebration because they had pulled him out of religious eduction classes earlier in the year.

Can't even begin to tell you how many Jewish holiday gatherings I've been to in my life. No one ever checked my bona fides at the door.

Headmaster Ian Davidson said that because the youngster had no interest in religion he could not celebrate the birth of Christ.

Furious mother Dawn Riddell, 38, said yesterday: "I've helped out at the Christmas party before and it's got absolutely nothing to do with Jesus. Douglas was heartbroken he couldn't go. It was cruel."

(snip)

As the family have no religious beliefs, Miss Riddell had asked for them to be exempt from RE lessons.

But she was stunned when the head called with the news about the party.

She contacted Moray Council to find out its policy on school parties and was told these were non-religious.

Sounds like someone got a bug in their saddle over the fact the family was "non-religious" and decided to be a Grinch. Or maybe England is in the forefront on the "War On Christmas" and they've already won. Either way, it won't be covered by O'Reilly.

Digg!

Tagged as: religion, christmas

Paddy is a regular contributor to Cliff Schecter.com.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There's the canary in the mine...
Posted by: davidg on Dec 22, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the culture. Nobody ruined Christmas like the Christians. Such an egregious farce. More evidence of a monolithic totalitarian culture. In time, the boy might grow up actually knowing the society he lives in. Could turn to gold...hard lesson, but a good one. Sounds like his parents are the ones that are going to be the real guidance, doing a great job. No teacher like alienation to find out who you are...and who others are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, for
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 22, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christ's sake!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Teacher's Side
Posted by: ginaodie on Dec 22, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know children are innocent and never make mistakes... but I'd like to know the story from the teacher's point of view.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Teacher's Side Posted by: atomic
» RE: Teacher's Side Posted by: ginaodie
» RE: Damn RIGHT! Posted by: boydranchitos
» Isn't Christmas Posted by: Tombo
» Religious education?! Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Isn't Christmas Posted by: Richard House
» RE: Teacher's Side Posted by: atomic
» RE: Teacher's Side Posted by: weslen1
» RE: Teacher's Side: Nonsense! Posted by: photon's feather
Now That's a Switch!
Posted by: Hollie on Dec 22, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an interesting twist on standard Christian operating procedure. Most of the time, they try to force Christmas on non-believers and their children. In the schools they have Christmas parties and Christmas trees and sing Christmas carols, They send religious holiday cards with Nativity scenes to Jews, coax their kids to sit on Santa's lap and write him letters, and coerce Jewish adults to participate in office Christmas celebrations from parties to "Secret Santa" exchanges. As a Jew I am usually the one telling Christians that Christmas is a religious holiday celebrating the birth of Jesus, and therefore they should not expect me to take part any moe than I expect THEM to fast on Yom Kippur. Ihave worked in offices where I was told that my refusal to deck my cubicle or office door with Christmas decorations was ruining the holiday for everyone else. I've had to endure constant elbows in my ribs as people pleaded, "Where's your Christmas spirit?" or angrily denounced me for not being a good sport. The pressures on kids are far, far worse. Well, I don't go around every spring whining that I can't enjoy Passover because not everyone else in my office is celebrating it. I don't try to shove Simchat Torah or Sukkot down the throats of my gentile co-workers. But Christians DEMAND that non-Christians take part in Christmas and bring all children up to believe that the holiday is merely a secular American tradition. I am sorry for the little boy whose feelings were undoubtedly hurt terribly by this silly exclusion--since his parents did not object, there would have been no harm in allowing him to participate. But it certainly does go against the Christian missionary tradition of constantly evangelizing, proselytizing, and coercing those who do not share their religious views.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Now That's a Switch! Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: Now That's a Switch! Posted by: Blondinista
» RE: Grow up, Fanatic! Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Grow up, Fanatic! Posted by: Life48
» RE: "Grow up," Imbecile. Posted by: Saitia
» RE: A Missed opportunity Posted by: Tombo
» RE: A Missed opportunity Posted by: Saitia
» RE: A Missed opportunity Posted by: Lady_L
» RE: A Missed opportunity Posted by: threecolors
» RE: A Missed opportunity Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Missed opportunity#2 Posted by: carcinoid112
Basic journalism
Posted by: Declan on Dec 22, 2007 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell is this? Doesn't the writer know how to write a story? HELLO!! Who, what, where, when why? A bit of information with a whole lot of information left out.
Interesting teaser-but not a complete story. Cut it out Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Basic journalism Posted by: Lady_L
» RE: Basic journalism Posted by: saywhat
At the risk of being petty
Posted by: pollyanna999 on Dec 22, 2007 3:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the expression is "a BURR under" one's saddle instead of "a BUG IN" it. My only other comment is that this whole thing doesn't seem very Christian to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: At the risk of being petty Posted by: photon's feather
it's a public school, and...
Posted by: kenhymes on Dec 22, 2007 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a public school that's described in the original article (in england, "council run" means the equivalent of local public school), and... neither the party nor the exclusion would happen here in the US.

Which ought to give some pause to those who say that Christianity is taking over here, while in Europe they've gotten all secularized. In fact there is a mixed picture in both places, but in general the wall between church and state is much healthier here than over there.

But you wouldn't know that from Alternet, which has an absolute obsession with the miserable failure that is the Christian right in the US, taking every opportunity to make a big deal of some stupid thing a fundie somewhere said this week.

It's tactically dumb, and culturally tone-deaf, and stems at least in part from a severe lack of first-hand knowledge of what actually happens in churches, in school districts, in the military, and other institutions, when it comes to religious belief.

I don't like the fundies any more than the next leftist, but the relentless focus on them gives them much more power than they actually posess. Huckabee's candidacy is going to make a lot of things much clearer, I think, for one the fact that the GOP never had any intention of pursuing theocracy, and that thus it is never going to happen.

Much better to pay attention to the needs of poor people, and to the actual positive things that local groups are doing outside the bubble to create alternative institutions that can do mercy and justice work in our communities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: it's a public school, and... Posted by: Richard House
Time to crash some parties!!!
Posted by: graffen48 on Dec 22, 2007 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say we all crash the next x-mas party with horns on our heads and pitchforks in our hands!!! Lol, lets give all these religious idiots a taste of their own medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't buy into the "Traditional" BS
Posted by: BigRon on Dec 22, 2007 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We Brits have been celebrating Midwinter since long before Christianity arrived on our shores and hijacked the idea. Christmas was abandoned by the Puritans after the English civil war (1649), and what we misguidedly think of as a "traditional" Christmas is anything but. "Traditional" as in "Like 1807"? In 1807 25th December wasn't even a public holiday (But New Year's Day was) and when it became a national holiday, (in the 1820s) in Lancashire there were riots against having two unpaid days so close together. The "tradition" of Xmas parties is anything BUT Christian! It' interesting that the Alternet report incorrectly reports the asertion that the Child (and school) in question are English, when they were in fact SCOTTISH. The Scots' religious traditions are VERY different to the English - far more Puritan and for far longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excuuse me
Posted by: Jeanne on Dec 22, 2007 7:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but Santa, the tree, holly, gift exchanges originate from highly un-christian pagan solstice observances. There was a time when true Christians eschewed such pagan practices and observed the "birthday" of Jesus in a much more seemly manner. (Let's not forget that Jesus wasn't born in the month of December.) As in so many other things, the Christians ripped off this holiday and claimed they thought of it. Typical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcuuse me Posted by: heinz57
From Schools to Gated Communities
Posted by: talkville on Dec 23, 2007 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Circles within circles within circles. This article exemplifies the theologically driven process of 'shunning' and more secular analogues such as exile. Any Club, Group, Association, etc will be at least vaguely familiar with processes such as these; at the outer boundaries, there will be those to be EXCLUDED.

When theo-logy and meta-physics want to rule, one must beware of the Circum-spect Ones. Both physically and morally, if given a bit of power they will become Circum-scribing Ones. If given a lot, or even absolute power, they will become Circum-scising Ones. They always want to actually and literally 'cut' themselves a Circle. Many times, they want to rule ALL.

There are more human and more reasonable ways to organize social relations. A much better world is possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agnostic
Posted by: heinz57 on Dec 23, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a firm believer that every school should be teaching religions of the world. What does the average American know about Islam, Judiasim, Hinduism or Christianity for that matter? As we now live in a multi-cultural society the understanding of religious views of others is extremely important, socially. In the above case, the school policy was based on an emotional response of a rather dubious understaning of Christianity. Adhearing to a church dogma is not what Christianity is about although some may wish to believe that. The article also does not mention what kind of religious education the school was offering, i.e. from a secular point of view or from a dogmatic church view. So, what was the point of this article, other than showing what bad religion is about, and that has been going on since man's creation of God.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And I thought my school was bad!
Posted by: bettyn on Dec 23, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Growing up in the 60's in the redneck South, we had prayers every day before classes. The few Jewish kids we had just stood and stared ahead and were never questioned. (There were so few of them, anyway.) And I don't believe they were sent home from Christmas celebrations.

What are we coming to with this garbage?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Locke'nLoad
Posted by: Locke'nload on Dec 23, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my second grade class in upstate NY, I had my head slammed into my desk by the teacher who had taken exception to my sitting quietly, head unbowed, while my schoolmates prayed. (Prayer in public school was legal then.) My family was not religious & I had an identifiably Jewish surname. My teacher was vicious and kept up her torture for the year that I was in her class.

The occasional bigot can hide among teachers and make a child's life miserable. The parents of these boys quite naturally bled for their excluded children and understandably came out swinging. Children require protection from adults who behave like thugs in the name of Jesus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This school was on dodgy legal ground
Posted by: hilaryuk on Dec 23, 2007 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
England is not the US. After the local council (which would be the education authority for this school) intervened, the school relented in the case of the younger child. The local council probably realised that they were being left wide open to a legal challenge as our schools are supposed to be non-discriminatory when it comes to religion. Unfortunately, we do have a sizable minority of state aided church schools, but even they are supposed to follow the non-discriminatory path.

Personally, I think Christians have an almighty nerve to get so possessive about the winter solstice festival that they themselves hijacked. They might choose to call it Christmas and, indeed, constructed a whole mythology about it that would have been surprising to the early Christians. However, I am happy to allow them their myths and ask only that they allow the rest of us ours. But the celebration of the Winter Solstice was there first and perhaps still has a more profound meaning, centred as it is on the promise of the world's rebirth. (Note: the whole world gets reborn not just the bit belonging to the chosen few).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]