Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Larry Flynt on Republicans Who "Can't Keep Their Pants On"

Posted by GottaLaff , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 1:29 PM on December 21, 2007.


Flynt claims he now has evidence about a closeted gay GOP senator who's not Larry Craig. "The other shoe's going to drop any day," Flynt says.
poar01hflynt0712
Larry Flynt

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I see England, I see France, I see Republicans with no pants!

In a lengthy, rollicking Vanity Fair interview, controversial pornographer and 1st Amendment "hero" Larry Flynt talks about the "progress" made so far on his million dollar campaign to expose "family values" politicians who can't keep their pants on.

Hold on to your hat.

Flynt also claims he now has evidence about a closeted gay Republican senator who is not Larry Craig. "The other shoe's going to drop any day," Flynt says. "It'll surprise a lot of people that he's gay. And I'll bet you he resigns the same day and rides off into the sunset."

That could be just about anyone. My mind is reeling, my pulse is quickening, my curiosity is piqued.

"Over the summer, when he began talking to me for this article, he dropped three A-list names--a Republican presidential candidate, a well-known Republican senator, and another prominent conservative official--whose peccadilloes he claimed Hustler was on the verge of exposing, hinting at hooker parties and no-tell-motel liaisons," Handy notes. "When we sit down in the fall, these names are off the table, though investigations are said to be ongoing."

Deputy Editor Handy continues:

"But Flynt's investigation of this second senator is at a tricky pass. 'His boyfriend is in a quandary about selling him out. It's really somewhat of a pathetic situation. But we also have other boyfriends that he's been involved with.' These earlier boyfriends are apparently willing to go on the record, and have also supplied Flynt's investigators with corroborating evidence. 'We got some motel records. We got some photographs. They don't involve sex, but sort of romantic walks on the beach and that sort of thing.'"

Aww, that's almost sweet. Almost. See? Not all Republicans are heartless. Hypocritical, maybe. But not heartless. Oh but I kid.

Wait, there's something about a deceased president, too? To be fair, there's some skepticism about part of this story:

"He tells a great story about Richard Nixon's brother Donald sneaking the then president out of the White House in the backseat of a beat-up old Chevy to visit hookers--a story he claims was told to him by someone who had been an adviser to the Nixon White House."

Flynt mocks Nixon, "And he couldn't get it up. And that was the same time he was telling Kissinger to bomb Hanoi. I felt there was a little irony in there: He can't get it up for sex but he can get it up for war."

That last part describes so many in BushCo it makes my head spin. But that's just speculation on my part. Disregard it. It's worthless. Ignore me. It's folly wolly doodle.

Oh and that skepticism? It was about Nixon's impotence.

No comment on that part. Or speculation. Or folly wolly doodle. I've had enough fun for one day.

Digg!

Tagged as: republican party, flynt, gay republicans, republican hypocrsiy

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Steady steady!
Posted by: ankhet on Dec 22, 2007 12:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Layer upon layer of irony - Flynt as moral watchdog? The mind reels!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Steady steady! Posted by: schnoggi
» RE: Steady steady! Posted by: Sissy
Flynt's credibility
Posted by: Sissy on Dec 22, 2007 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know what? I believe Larry Flynt over every politician "out there". Except for multi-million dollar law suits should he be wrong, what has he got to lose?

I remember when he went on the hunt for hypocritical politicians. It was in the last election cycle when the sanctimonious, hypocritical, self-serving, God fearing republicans, mostly the right wing sort, who claimed that only they were fit to run for office, oversee the American people and had the morals to run the country, much less lead the world.

Larry Flynt set out to see just how moral and uprighteous these people were and all sorts of "stuff" fell out of the woodwork. So much so that in the election coming up, I would dare say that not any republican who has the unmitigated nerve to make those claims yet again, that he/she would be laughed at all the way to the polls.

Perhaps that is why I am agasp at all the "God talk" of the current republican and democratic candidate bench. I really and truly hoped and believed that we got over combining church and state and were ready to deal with the issues which are so many that once we elect a president, he/she should have barely enough time to go to church!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you the MAN!!
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Dec 22, 2007 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GO FLYNT GO!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

elephant in the room
Posted by: davidg on Dec 22, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real issue is the homophobia in the culture. Get rid of it and you don't raise hypocrites. Larry Craig and Haggard are pitiful phonies who are products of their environment. Most developed countries have re-elected gay politicians, and few people are small enough to care. America is mired in its own prurient moralism and rigtheousness thanks to the fundies and conservatives. The progressives and merely kind people have to work a little harder. The issue is hompohobia that hurts everbody. Victims and perpetrators. And furthermore, the media does a toxic job of debunking the bigots. Wonder why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eenie Meenie Miney Moe, Catch a Senator By the Toe
Posted by: jmmartin on Dec 22, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I figure it has to be Trite Loot, Mitch McComical, or that pansy ass from South Carolina, Linsie Glam. But I take issue with your characterization of my old boss, Larry Flynt, as a "First Amendment 'hero.'" The use of quotation marks around the word "hero" suggests there is some doubt as to the honorific. Let there be no question that Mr. Flynt is indeed a First Amendment Hero: he took a bullet for it. He's crippled and confined to a wheel chair because he's a First Amendment absolutist in the vein of Holmes, Brennan, and too damn few others!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why doesn't Larry Flynt offer a reward to election fraud whistleblowers?
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Dec 22, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much fun as it is to see blatant hypocrisy outed, I think there is a greater need for restoring Democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Face It
Posted by: Candleinheart on Dec 22, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
EVERYONE has skeletons in their closet. Personally, I wish we were back in the days of FDR. Four sons never knew of FDR's short relationship with Lucy Mercer until AFTER his death. The press, and everyone respected privacy in those days. I think it shameful, reprehensible, and sad that we know of everyone's sex life today. We all are entitled to a private life! What goes on in someone's bedroom is their business alone.
I just want to see a job well done. I remember liking JFK. wasn't crazy about him, but liked him. Then I heard on TV, read, of all his White House escapades. That he and Clinton compromised security by leaving the White House at night for rendevous. Darn! I didn't want to know or hear it but these things are in your face daily! Of course, knowing a man's 'appetites' perhaps we do need to have presidents that are older, past the stage of proving their manhood muchless cheating on their wives! A man is a man is a man. All us women KNOW that, but for me I want my president to be a cut above the norm.
A president needs to be strong, have character, courage,inner strength, be a terrific example of a high minded human being.
When Bill Clinton was running the 11 year affair surfaced about Fleurs. He got elected anyway. Truly, if a great woman were to run and her past included a number of affairs? She'd be gone in an hour. Double standard still exists. Nothing ever changes.
Now we know Rudy cheated. Didn't like him before, like him less now. Can't get past these facts once known. Why I wish all private lives were kept PRIVATE! I suppose when Bush was running and the fact of his having a woman get an abortion when he was in his substance abuse phase, he'd probably still get elected despite his protestations of being re-born? (Could argue that at great lengths).
IF sexual escapades interfere with a man's/woman's job that's one thing. At some point everyone faces the wrongs and hurts done to others. As the Bible states along with twelve step programs, "Do not be concerned with the speck in your brother/sister's eye, but work diligently at removing the board in your own." Put simply, "Don't take another's inventory." Each person will face ALL their misdeeds later. Never fails. I do wish a law was passed that people's private lives were kept private. This is common decency and would raise our image in the world. Many a European has stated that "Sex is God in America." Just keep it PRIVATE for God's sake!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's Face It Posted by: Sissy
TO: whoever is "gottalaff"
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Dec 22, 2007 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice I put "gottalaff" in "'s.
Whoever the hell you are, after reading THIS:
'1st Amendment "hero" Larry Flynt',

I need to ask THIS:

WHAT THE HELL HAVE YOU DONE FOR THE 1ST AMENDMENT LATELY??!!

Caps INTENTIONAL.

If you have done NOTHING as I suspect, it is time for you to sit down and shut the fuck up.

I support what Flynt is doing for us.
All you are doing is blathering in the style of those who write for the rags you see at the checkout lines.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's actually hard to guess... Lindsey Graham? Boehner? Hatch? McConnell?
Posted by: xbj on Dec 22, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gosh, there are just so many damn closet queen hypocrites in the NaziGOP it's hard to guess which one will be next. Truly an embarassment of log cabin riches of Riefenstahlian proportions...

And of course, we don't damn them for being gay; Lord knows they do that to themselves. Rather we damn them for being such relentless Nazi hypocrites about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thebigkate
Posted by: Thebigkate on Dec 22, 2007 1:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually am against exposing the illicit sexual lives of public people--EXCEPT when it comes to Christian fundamentalists (those who preach "family values," deride homosexuality, and are usually misogynistic)! That really is an exposure of psychopathy, dishonesty and hypocrisy--a different matter altogether!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the latest at the sewing circle
Posted by: meltedpriest on Dec 22, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Y'all sound like a bunch of old ladies gossiping at the sewing-circle!

"Oh! Who can it be? Who can it be? Bzz, buzz, buzzz, bz."

Do you really think that some tell-all expose from the Flynt'ster corner is going to usher in a wave of newly converted Greens, from the ranks of disaffected Repub's? Hah! I wouldn't bet my latest subscruption of Penthouse on it, if I were you.

They'll just shrug, think it's all a lie by the "Leftwing Lib'ral Bias," and nod like one of those silly head-wagging dog-toys, in cue to Their Master's Voice (whomever that Master might be).

Kudos to Flynt for boldly exposing (and soon, baring) all, but you guys gotta get some perspective. Flynt's exposes will change little in the seating-arrangements at the Bush-Faithful Choir.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

James Rodgers
Posted by: james on Dec 22, 2007 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's true that Nixon was impotent, let me be first with the Inquirer headline;
Tricky Dick had tricky dick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]