Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Afro-Netizen
All Spin Zone
Altercation
Americablog
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Another Iranian Online
August J. Pollak
Baghdad Burning
Barry Lando
Bloggrrrlz Gallery
Blondesense
Bob Geiger
Body and Soul
Boing Boing
Booman Tribune
BOP News
Bush Watch
BUZZFLASH
Carpetbagger
Clean Air Blog
Cool Hunting
Corrente
CrooksandLiars
Cursor
Dahr Jamail
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
DC Media Girl
DemiOrator
Direland
Echidne of the Snakes
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton
Fact-esque
Falafel Sex, and Other Things Best Left Unsaid
Farai Chideya
Feminist Peace Network
Feministe
Feministing
Frameshop
Gristmill
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
James Wolcott
Jesus General
Lady Jayne's Blog
Liberal Oasis
Mad Kane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Media Girl
Media is a Plural
MediaCitizen
Metafilter
Michael Berube
MyDD
News Dissector
News For Real
Norbizness
Oliver Willis
Pacific Views
Pandagon
Political Animal
PopPolitics.com
PR Watch
Prometheus 6
Raed in the Middle
RH Reality Check
Robert Greenwald
Roger Ailes
Rox Populi
Sadly, No!
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeares Sister
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
SpeakSpeak
Stay Free!
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBogg
Thatcoloredfellasweblog
The Bilerico Project
The Hutchinson Political Report
The Republic of T
The Revealer
The Sideshow
The Swift Report
Think Progress
This Modern World
TikvahGirl
Trish Wilson
War and Piece
Waveflux
What She Said!
Whiskey Bar
Working Families Vote 2008
Romney Parses the Words ‘Saw,’ ‘March,’ and ‘With’
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
Also in PEEK
The Best Convention Speech You Missed
Josh Dorner Sierra Club
Columngate: The Media's Latest Alarmist Non-Story
Jill Hussein C. Brilliant at Breakfast
Protesters Fight for Separation of Church and Dems
PZ Myers Pharyngula
I had no intention of returning to Mitt Romney's Martin Luther King story yet again, but the former governor is just making this too easy. The last thing any presidential candidate needs, worse yet one with a history of dissembling, two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, is a flap that leads to embarrassing word-parsing, but that's exactly what Romney has here.
Mitt Romney acknowledged yesterday that he never saw his father march with Martin Luther King Jr. as he asserted in a nationally televised speech this month, and historical evidence shows that Michigan's Governor George Romney and the civil rights leader never did march together.
Romney said his father had told him he had marched with King and that he had been using the word "saw" in a "figurative sense."
"If you look at the literature, if you look at the dictionary, the term 'saw' includes being aware of in the sense I've described," Romney told reporters in Iowa. "It's a figure of speech and very familiar, and it's very common. And I saw my dad march with Martin Luther King. I did not see it with my own eyes, but I saw him in the sense of being aware of his participation in that great effort."
Oh my. Consider this nine-word sentence: "I saw my father march with Martin Luther King." As of now, Romney wants to parse the words, "saw," "march," and "with."
When the questions continued yesterday, Romney added, "I'm an English literature major. When we say I saw the Patriots win the World Series*, it doesn't necessarily mean you were there."
As Josh Marshall said, "[A]fter all I've said about his strengths in the GOP nomination race, I think Mitt owes me a little more than to make a fool of himself like this."
What's striking is how unnecessary all of this. Romney could have said, "I was a young man in the 1960s and it's possible my memory, four decades later, is hazy on some of the details. The important point to remember here is that my father was a champion of civil rights, and my values on the issue are very much in line with his."
But no, Romney chose a different direction -- one that includes debating the meaning of uncomplicated words.
It even came to this.
A spokesperson for Mitt Romney now tells the Boston Phoenix that George W. Romney and Martin Luther King Jr. marched together in June, 1963 -- although possibly not on the same day or in the same city.
Romney, according to one piece of written source material provided by the campaign, made a "surprise" appearance at a small march in Grosse Pointe, Michigan, in late June -- several days after King led a much larger march in Detroit. Romney spokesperson Eric Fehrnstrom suggests that these two were part of the same "series" of events, co-sponsored by King and the NAACP, and is thus consistent with Romney's claim that "I saw my father march with Martin Luther King."
"The record is convincing and clear - George Romney marched with Martin Luther King and other civil rights demonstrators," Fehrnstrom wrote in an email.
Yes, we're now down to debating the meaning of the word "with."
Romney and his campaign really aren't doing themselves any favors here.
*EDITOR'S NOTE: Romney is also very misinformed about local sports by the way, even though he was Governor of Massachusetts he talks about the Patriots (a football team) winning the World Series (which is for baseball). But that's just a side note.
Tagged as: martin luther king, romney
Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.
| Also in PEEK | |||
| The Best Convention Speech You Missed Montana's Governor Schweitzer electrified the convention with his energy speech. Post by Josh Dorner. August 28, 2008. |
Columngate: The Media's Latest Alarmist Non-Story Is this really the best they can come up with? Post by Jill Hussein C.. August 28, 2008. |
Protesters Fight for Separation of Church and Dems The Democratic Party is sliding away from the positions that actually motivate my support. Post by PZ Myers. August 28, 2008. |
|