Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health Care: California's Moment and a National Movement

Posted by Dennis Rivera, AlterNet at 2:32 PM on December 18, 2007.


Legislation passed in California yesterday shows the potential for real healthcare reform is alive and well.

With President Bush's SCHIP veto setting a grim tone for the end of 2007, there are millions of families desperate for a sign that America is making progress on the battle for healthcare reform. (Anyone who doesn't think it's a battle, please recall what this administration did to Graeme Frost and his family after they spoke up for expanded funding for SCHIP. Then send an enormous lump of coal directly to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.)

The healthcare legislation that the California Assembly passed yesterday is an undeniable sign that the potential for real healthcare reform is alive and well in a state with the greatest number of uninsured in the nation and every complicating reason to simply throw up their hands in the face of this challenge: a looming state budget crisis; housing costs that lead the nation; struggling healthcare providers; an ever-widening gap between the rich and working families. No disrespect to California, but the list of challenges is long. And long before this historic vote, many parties could've thrown in the towel. But they didn't.

That California has fashioned a real roadmap for providing more secure, affordable healthcare coverage is a credit to Governor Schwarzenegger and the California legislature, and to working families and healthcare leaders who are so saddened and frustrated by our healthcare system that they seized this moment and would not let go. Even if California's plan isn't perfect - and many of these same folks would say that it's not -it does focus on improving the health of every Californian, improving the quality of California's healthcare system, and addressing some of the root causes of escalating healthcare costs.

Here's what AB x1 1, the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Act, would do:

  • Requires all Californians to enroll in a healthcare plan by July, 2010, exempting those who would incur "undue hardship."
  • Creates a state-run purchasing pool to help people obtain affordable policies.
  • Expands Healthy Families (California's already-successful use of SCHIP!) coverage to children whose parents earn up to three times the federal poverty level, $51,510 for a family of three.
  • Helps families pay for their coverage - families earning up to 2 1/2 times the poverty level, or $42,925 for a family of three, would receive subsidies; and for those earning up to four times the poverty level, or $68,680 for a family of three, would get tax credits if their share of premiums for an average-priced policy exceeds 5.5% of their incomes.
  • Prevents insurance companies from cherry-picking patients by making it illegal to refuse customers because of past ailments, age or any other factor.
  • Require insurers to spend at least 85% of their collected premiums on health benefits.
  • Encourages healthy lifestyles, responsible management of chronic conditions, and preventative medicine through obesity prevention, diabetes treatment, and other programs.
  • Fosters greater efficiency by encouraging the use of electronic records to keep patients' histories and deliver drug prescriptions to pharmacies.

And just as important as what the bill does, this process to enact it keeps everyone engaged in the process to continue to shape its success, starting with California voters at the ballot in November of '08, and including elected officials, employers, individuals, and healthcare providers.

If you talked to some of the nurses and healthcare workers who work on the front lines of the California healthcare system, they would tell you that healthcare reform doesn't belong to a political party, or an age, or an income level, but it surely does have a moment in time. And despite what the Bush administration, think tanks, conservatives, economists or healthcare scrooges might say, there's no doubt in their minds: that moment starts now and it starts with California.

Digg!

Tagged as: healthcare, california

Dennis Rivera is the Chair of SEIU Healthcare. SEIU Healthcare unites over 1 million nurses and healthcare workers in the hospital, nursing home, homecare industries in a national union dedicated to ensuring the highest quality of care for every patient, fixing our broken healthcare system, and improving the lives of healthcare workers, their families, and their communities.


Poll-watch: Gallup Finds Wedding-Cake Sized Marriage Gap in Pres Race
Apparently, the married and unmarried have very different concerns.
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Michael Moore Dares to Ask: What's So Heroic About Being Shot Down While Bombing Innocent Civilians?
Like Iraq, Vietnam was not a noble cause. It's time we stopped letting politicians and the press perpetuate the McCain War Hero myth.
Post by Liliana Segura. August 21, 2008.
Bush Capitulates, Troop Withdrawal in 2011?
The left won the Iraq debate. Period.
Post by Spencer Ackerman. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
SEIU MUST RE-TRAIN WORKERS FOR A NEW PREVENTION MODEL
Posted by: drricklippin on Dec 18, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis-

Thanks for the details on the California plan.

I believe one of SEIUs challenges is how to help your members effect the necessary transition from disease care workers to health care workers or even better prevention workers.

Prevention must be implemented incrementally and always with compassion but nevertheless it MUST be implemented soon.

Be Well,

Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mandating Corporate Welfare for Health Insurers
Posted by: bthespoon on Dec 18, 2007 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is not the same as creating affordable, sustainable, transparent health care for Californians. REAL reform (SB-840) was passed by both houses and vetoed by Arnold. It would have covered everyone more reliably and comprehensively while saving $12 billion dollars. Arnold's substitute for real reform won't cover everyone, is under-estimated to cost an additional $12 billion (for a $24 billion dollar difference) with no cost controls in sight. Forcing everyone to feed the beast that is the problem (profit-driven health insurance middlemen) will not solve the problem: an immoral, over-priced quagmire created purposefully by and for the profits and benefit of profit-driven health insurers at the expense and to the detriment of the people. This plan is like trying to solve racial discrimination by forcing everyone to pay the KKK. Shame on you for helping mislead the public. With friends like this article, progressives don't need enemies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When you madate an increase in demand for a monopolized service, you get higher prices and profits
Posted by: NorskyBoy on Dec 18, 2007 4:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Requires all Californians to enroll in a healthcare plan by July, 2010, exempting those who would incur "undue hardship."

Well, those are two huge, anti-consumer mistakes right there. In the first place, you mandate the purchase of an already over priced service (insurance) that suffers from dangerously poor quality. The basic problems are (1) people aren't getting what they are paying for at very high and rapidly prices, and (2) many people cannot afford those outrageous and rapidly increasing prices. Forcing more people to buy insurance will drive up prices, leaving the rest of the population even farther from being able to afford insurance. How does allowing them to petition for the right to remain uninsured help them at all?

The remedies for this huge flaws are inadequate and biased in favor of families. Families are important, but not so important that we can ignore the elderly, the young and independent, and single workers and others.

Not surprisingly, the union that represents California's registered nurses, as opposed to the aides, orderlies, and LVN's represented by SEIU--is not happy with this sell out of the need for true universal coverage that is not corrupted by insurance companies that continue to jack rates at many times the rate of inflation even without government joining their cause by forcing people to buy their product. Check out what a California Nurses Association nurse has to say about what this half baked plan really means for Californians:

"RNs Say Latest Health Bill Even More Flawed - Still a Boondoggle for Insurance Companies While Affordability Provisions are Eroded"

That is not something to celebrate, that is something to vigorously oppose. Do not be fooled. This is just another step toward the fascist ideal of government doing the bidding of big business by using its powers to force compliance with the corporate goals instead of serving and protecting the flesh and blood people it is supposedly of, by, and for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No on AB x1 1
Posted by: Gregsdiary on Dec 18, 2007 5:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California Nurses Association is not for AB x1 1

Here's what Ralp Nader said in support of the California Nurses Association.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No on AB x1 1 Posted by: Gregsdiary
So now Alternet shills for the insurance industry?
Posted by: Camilla Cracchiolo on Dec 18, 2007 5:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeez, what is with the articles lately? This article is a true pro-corporate piece-of-crap and has no business here.

Arnold's plan is a lousy, rotten alternative to Sheila Kuehl's true single payer plan, passed by assembly and state senate but vetoed by Arnold. It was a much, much better plan. Only problem is, it cut the big insurance companies out.

Arnold is treating healthcare like it's car insurance (also mandatory here in CA). Except you have the option to take the bus if you can't afford car insurance. You can't afford to screw around with your health.

The insurance industry is bloated. Worse, for profit insurance companies pit people's lives against the profits of their shareholders. This is immoral. For profit companies directly delivering health care should just be outlawed.

By a for-profit company, I don't mean someone who runs a mom-and-pop nursing home, or a doctor or nurse getting good pay. A for-profit corporation has shareholders and is *legally obligated* to make maximizing the return of profit to shareholders its #1 concern.

Guess who will benefit most from Arnold's plan? It won't be us....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another sell-out to the Insurance moguls
Posted by: zanedavis on Dec 18, 2007 8:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The previous posters are exactly right. I don't see why SEIU would endorse a bill so anti-middle class and only marginally helpful for those who are currently uninsured.
For a crtique of this lame excuse for reform,
go to www.sen.ca.gov/kuehl.
Sen. Kuehl is the author of a single-payer plan for California (SB840)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arguably, this bill is even worse than the one he vetoed...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 19, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...which would have removed consumer choice by the medicare-style approach of mandating that providers who accept private dollars to perform medicare-approved procedures are ineligible to receive medicare funds for a period of years.

This one blows choice completely out of the water:

Requires all Californians to enroll in a healthcare plan by July, 2010, exempting those who would incur "undue hardship."

From where does a government supposedly of the people, by the people, and for the people derive the power to mandate the health care choices of women and men?

Seriously, I've seen less pro-choice sentiment among people holding outside planned parenthood clinics.

To the tinpot tyrants of the CA legislature and chez gubernator:

1) mandating health care decisions that belong to the people isn't your job.

2) Even if it was your job-which it most certainly isn't--it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that you need to prove that you can dream up and implement public policies to reliably deliver electricity--as you abjectly failed to do circa ~2000--for the rest of the decade before you busy yourself with heart valves and kidney transplants.

This is draconian anti-choice legislation at it's absolute worst. It's downright Booshayan!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly! Posted by: ABetterFuture
?????????????????
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Dec 19, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" the use of electronic records to keep patients' histories and deliver drug prescriptions to pharmacies."

Just which division of the Calistapo will have access to these records??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arnie's OK
Posted by: willymack on Dec 19, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This newest good news from the state next door to me tells me two things. That Arnie has a heart, and that it's in the right place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]