Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

David Gregory Battles With Talking-Point Dispensing Robot (a.k.a. Hillary)

Posted by Jason Linkins, Huffington Post at 2:56 PM on December 17, 2007.


The Clinton campaign decided that they'd save a little money and use today's morning news shows to mount a lengthy campaign commercial.
David Gregory Does Battle With Talking-Point Dispensing Robot (a.k.a. Hillary)

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Earlier this morning, the Hillary Clinton campaign decided that they'd save a little money and use today's morning news shows to mount a lengthy campaign commercial, chock-a-block with all the new focus-tested sentences that have been the centerpiece of her campaign ever since its "Well, Okay, Then, We're About 'Change' Now, Too" Reboot. It was a perfect plan.

Unfortunately, this required her to confront the Today Show's David Gregory, who inconveniently decided to start "asking questions", and "holding" her campaign "accountable" to statements they had made.

GREGORY: So, Senator, if people look at the last six weeks and they might question how Hillary Clinton responds to a crisis or how she handles pressure and they might point to the fact that you complained about the all boys network of presidential politics in the wake of the Philadelphia debate, they would see your husband complaining about media coverage of you, they'd see your campaign raise the past drug issue and use by Barack Obama or questioned him for his ambition, and they might say, well, this is really what we don't like about politics. Is that fair?

CLINTON: Well, i don't think that's at all an accurate representation of my campaign. You know, campaigns are like life. You know, some days are perfect. Some days aren't. But what really matters is where you're headed, what you do when you suffer some kind of, you know, problem, how you put yourself back on track and, you know, I've been doing this a long time.

GREGORY: I'm sorry. You said that was unfair. You dispute those were how you handled things in the wake of hitting that rough patch?

CLINTON: I'm going to let voters decide that, not the press. I'm going to let voters make up their minds. what I see happening here and across the country is voters are responding very positively to my campaign. I'm a proven leader. That's what The Des Moines Register said, what a lot of my supporters say.

Right! Silly David Gregory! As they say: Post Des Moines Register, ergo propter Des Moines Register! Still, Gregory pressed on something one of Clinton's "supporters" has said.

GREGORY: Let's talk about a key issue you raise on the campaign trail, that's your experience. It was your husband, the former president, that said Barack Obama as president would be "rolling the dice" with america's future. Assuming you agree with that, let's be clear. an Obama presidency is a risk to what? America's national security, America's economic health? What precisely?

CLINTON: Well, i would ask people to read the Des Moines Register editorial. Basically what they said is we need a proven leader. We have tough times.

GREGORY: What does it mean? We know what The Register said.

CLINTON: I think that's one of the principal cases for my candidacy. If you want to know what changes I'll make, look at the changes I've already made. Everybody talks about change. Everybody talks about change in this campaign. Some people think you get change by demanding it. Some think you get it by hoping for it. I think you get it by doing really hard work. That's what I've done.

GREGORY: Senator Clinton, you're not answering the question. Your husband said it would be "rolling the dice" for America's future if he were elected. What's the risk to America if Barack Obama is the president?

CLINTON: [Pause] You know, he not only said that, but the Des Moines Register editorial implied that.

Wow! It's a good thing the Des Moines Register didn't come out in favor of Clinton jumping into the Dale Maffit Reservoir!

Anyway, Gregory, growing tired of this battle of wits, attempted to shift the discussion. But Hillary hadn't yet finished dispensing platitudes.

GREGORY: So you're choosing not to answer that question. let me ask you another issue --

CLINTON: No, I'm -- no, wait a minute. I'm making the case for my candidacy. I'm very happy that I have -- I have strong supporters and I have editorial support. Well, you know, I think that voters will have to judge us, and that's what I welcome. I invite people to do that.

Right. Scrutiny is welcome, so long as it leads to an endorsement. Otherwise: DOES NOT COMPUTE!

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, election08, today show, gregory

Jason Linkins is an associate editor at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, DC.


Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bubba said...
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 17, 2007 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gives a **** what her husband thinks or says? I agree with her point that she's running for president, not Bill.

In spite of her typically evasive, roundabout, wall-of-phony-optimism responses in the beginning, this guy loses this one by making her responsible for what her husband says, or allegedly says. There are plenty of substantive things a better interviewer could probably have nailed her on, but he chooses to obsess on petty he-said/she-said nonsense.

I also liked her final comment. She should bring this clown with her on the campaign trail just to push her buttons, because she comes across better here than I've ever seen her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» quite a strong performance by hillary Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» although not seemless Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» No, I'm not making your point, Posted by: OldRedleg
» The point I have made, Posted by: OldRedleg
» RE: The point I have made, Posted by: newtype_alpha
» sometimes i guess i am unclear Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Read OldRedleg's stuff Posted by: travman67
» i agree with his point Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: Bubba said... Posted by: CoatesMoe
» RE: Bubba said... Posted by: Tombo
Good Lord!
Posted by: OldRedleg on Dec 17, 2007 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's wrong with Gregory? Doesn't he understand that he is dealing with the corporate-anointed front runner and that he should be treating her with more deference and kid gloves!?! This is not the time to start actually acting like a journalist. Wait 'til Bill gets wind of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hilary
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 17, 2007 5:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry,but hilary is more of the same thing I have grown sooooooo tired of. empty words and happy thoughts,followed by attacks on anyone who wants to know an answer to a question. she is looking only for praise,doesn't gregory know that? just ask the des moines register. ps Iowa is full of backward thinking 7 generation racists and bible thumpers,same as nebraska,n dakota,s dakota who gives a shit what people in Iowa think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHO WILL TAKE THE MORAL HIGH GROUND?
Posted by: GoldenT on Dec 17, 2007 6:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has either Mr. Gregory or Ms. Clinton signed Congressman Wexler's petition calling for immediate impeachment hearings against Vice President Darth Cheney?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same Old Same Old
Posted by: Litespeed_Stu on Dec 18, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She sounds like George Bush in a dress.

Ugh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, I posted this under Giuliani drops like a rock.
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 18, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, I think it's appropriate to the discussion about Hillary and her "because I deserve it" campaign - sounds like HW when asked about why he should get a second term - which he didn't.

This first part is in reponse to Giuliani's demise (one hopes).
(The Republican clown posse
begins its slow descent into mindless oblivion. Since all of these weinies seemingly began mindless (creationism, anyone?), they are simply returning to their primordial ooziness. I say good riddance. Now we must select the most different Democrat to elect in 2008)

It is becoming, sadly, apparent that this is not Hillary. She and the Billboy are showing the same kind of arrogant meanness that the Bushits exemplified in HW and daShrub. Obama seems a nice enough fellow, but I fear he's waaaaay too green.

The candidate most different is Kucinich - if only. However, Edwards is the most viable/different combination (and relatively unfettered by corporate $$$$$$, except what he's squeezed out for clients - good for him) and if he could name Kucinich his VP and give him as much input as Shithead has given the Dick, we could be on our way to a better, stronger America (with a viable, vibrant, economically sound middle class) right after Jan 20, 2009. Hope springs eternal even among cynical progressives. Take back America - eat a CEO, hedge fund manager or lobbyist today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary suitability for office?
Posted by: herbal on Dec 19, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was wrong about the Iraq war and wrong about Iran:

http://www.thought-criminal.org/article/node/909

In addition to taking a gander at this site, consider her campaign contributions from Rupert Murdoch, the Australian fascist and FOX News owner.

Consider her voting record of unbridled and unapologetic support for the Bush campaign and Iraq war.

Then see her video of endorsement of the Iran war:
The real big election winner may well not be Hillary so much as the Republican neo-cons and Christian Zionists who win if she wins.

Don't believe it? Just google 'Hillary Clinton AIPAC' and then try 'Rev. Hagee AIPAC', the self described Christian Zionist, and you will see that Hillary's agenda is not only a reflected by her abysmal voting record for the Bush agenda, but a committment to AIPAC for a nuclear invasion of Iran. She has tacitly endorsed of the rapture cult. She is the darling of the Israel lobby that has tirelessly pushed for invasion of Iran.

Hillary = perpetual war and war profiteering and corporatism.

That is why Hillary Clinton is a pox on America. Hillary will be the designated nominee, not by rank and file Democrats, but by Rupert Mudoch, Disney, GE, Westinghouse, CITI Bank and the war industry. See: www.thought-criminal.org/article/node/909

Hillary has paid her dues to the corporatists and is biding her time. Does it really make a difference if she is President rather than a Republican? We can hope that the other Democratic candidates can begin to torpedo Hillary instead of coddling her. Hillary's war record needs to be flaunted and no mercy shown. Gravel and Kucinich need to step up to Edwards' qualities in his excellent dissing of Corporations as agents of corruption.

Hillary is predictably the wrong choice for President or any public service.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Are We Attacking the Wrong People
Posted by: tommy1957 on Dec 19, 2007 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So you don't like Hillary; then don't vote for her; simple end of discussion. You want to attack someone; attack the republicans; the "Party of the Wide Stance", or are you just a republican try to bring down the democratic front runner. Makes me wonder. I voted for Bill twice. I think it was the stinking; two face republicans who disrupted his brilliant reign as president. Most were closet gay hypocrites with numerous affairs with both heterosexual and homosexual partners. Now his wife who maybe even more liberal than Bill is running and everyone is attacking her; based on what - what the republicans have said; give me a break. Are you fools? Falling for their BS. Hillary may not do an immediate pullout of the troops in Iraq, but she will far faster that the likes of Johnny War Monger; Huckleberry Hound Dog; Mitt the Mitten man (with his 5 brave sons); or that old guy; you know the actor; Fred Flintstone. Vote for a democrat and if you have something bad to say; make sure it is about the current administration or one of the Bozos who is running on the other side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Attacking? Posted by: improperly_sedated
» If you are sincere, please Posted by: herbal