Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

189 Republicans Affirm Their Support of Torture

Posted by The Xsociate , The All Spin Zone at 7:19 AM on December 14, 2007.


The House passes waterboarding ban, now it must make it through the Senate and Bush has promised to veto.
rbushtorturevetolarge
torture

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I'm back to my one trick pony propensity again but given the serious of the subject matter -- the subjection to and potential cover up of the torture of US detainees -- I feel a bit of harping is warranted. But as with most things the Congress does these days, they just aren't thinking far enough ahead.

Yesterday, the House took the advice of a phalanx of retired Army and Navy officers to ignoring President Bush's threat to veto and passed by a ban on the practice of waterboarding.

The House approved legislation yesterday that would bar the CIA from using waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics, drawing an immediate veto threat from the White House and setting up another political showdown over what constitutes torture.
The measure, approved by a largely party-line vote of 222 to 199, would require U.S. intelligence agencies to follow Army rules adopted last year that explicitly forbid waterboarding. It also would require interrogators to adhere to a strict interpretation of the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war. The rules, required by Congress for all Defense Department personnel, also ban sexual humiliation, "mock" executions and the use of attack dogs, and prohibit the withholding of food and medical care.

The measure still must make it through the Senate, which given that some members have already signaled their willingness to downplay even the most heinous of practices, remains very much in doubt.

But even if it were to reach full passage, it would be -- as my post title suggests -- utterly meaningless. For you see the Congress has already affirmed such a ban. It was a little thing called the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. And we all remember how long that "ban" lasted (hint: as long as it took the ink to dry on the "Only if I want to" note Bush attached to it).

So while we can applaud Congress for once again seeking to clear up the issue of just which practices are acceptable, if past is prologue, this latest affirmation won't matter one bit.

More from DHinMI and Carpetbagger.

Digg!

Tagged as: republicans, torture, bush administration, democratic congress, waterboarding

The Xsociate is a blogger for the All Spin Zone


How Obama Pushed Hard For a Public Option, Then Bailed When It Mattered Most
Despite his history of supporting the government-run insurance plan, Obama did little to pressure lawmakers when it mattered most.
Post by Zaid Jilani. December 22, 2009.
We Have a Winner! Sarah Palin's "Death Panel" Fallacy Named "Lie of the Year"
The award was bequeathed by Politifact, an independent fact-checker.
Post by Steve Benen. December 22, 2009.
Thanks to Dems' Pussyfooting, Health Industry Stocks Shoot Skyward
The bump does not appear to be indicative of broader economic improvement.
Post by Byard Duncan. December 22, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?