Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Clinton Campaign Is Backwards on Racist Drug War

Posted by Tony Newman, Huffington Post at 12:01 PM on December 13, 2007.


Now Clinton's behind the curve on another war.
capt.0bdfb9ffe65142ab952e3d84228b3396.democratsdebatesccd116
Hillary

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Every presidential election year there is a news cycle about candidates' drug use. The "I did not inhale" statement by then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton was one of the most humorous and pitiful "admissions" that still makes the eyes roll. Another pathetic example of hypocrisy came from George W. Bush. "Mr. Straight Shooter" still refuses to answer questions about his "youthful indiscretions," and the record has been expunged. In this context, Sen. Barack Obama's honesty on this topic was so refreshing. In his book, Dreams from My Father, Obama openly admits to not only smoking marijuana but trying cocaine. We also have read about Obama's current struggles over giving up cigarettes.

Why should any of us be surprised that any politician, whether it be Sen. Obama, former Vice President Gore, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg or former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, has tried (and maybe even enjoyed) marijuana or other drugs. Remember, despite 40 years of attempting to make a "Drug-Free America," half of all high school students have tried marijuana before they graduate from high school.

Tens of millions of Americans still use drugs (alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, Viagra, cocaine, caffeine, prescription drugs) both for pleasure and to soothe pain. The fact that Obama used drugs in his youth only humanizes him. I believe that it will backfire for Hillary and her campaign to try to "Willie Horton" Obama on the drug question. Hillary is still facing anger from voters for her cynical support of Bush's devastating war in Iraq. Far from showing leadership, Hillary has constantly been behind the curve and public sentiment regarding the war in Iraq. And now Hillary is showing that she is behind the curve when it comes to the other war: the war on drugs.

Not only is her campaign trying to take down Obama with drug baiting, she is also backwards when it comes to our racist drug laws. Federal mandatory minimums enacted by Congress in the 1980s punished sellers of crack cocaine 100 times more severely than those convicted of powder-cocaine offenses. Five grams of crack means an automatic five years in jail. It takes up to 500 grams of powdered cocaine for the same punishment. This has not led to less drug use but, instead, a prison system that mass incarcerates African Americans and Latinos. While drug abuse doesn't discriminate, our drug policies do. Despite equal drug use among blacks and whites, blacks go to jail on drug charges at 13 times the rate of whites. Hillary Clinton is the only major Democratic presidential candidate who did not support the Sentencing Commission's unanimous vote this week to apply recent sentencing reductions for crack-cocaine offenses retroactively.

The war in Iraq and the war on drugs are two unwinnable wars that have caused unimaginable suffering and death. The country is looking for leadership and for exit strategies that will allow us to heal from these catastrophes. Hillary has decided to put her chips on the Bush Administration's fearmongoring. Hillary is tone deaf and living in the past. In upcoming elections it is going to be "drug baiting" and support of inhumane and racist laws that will cost more votes than having tried marijuana when you were young.

Digg!

Tagged as: drugs, obama, election08, drug policy, hillary clinton

Tony Newman is the director of media relations for the Drug Policy Alliance.


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Absolutely absolutely right
Posted by: StoneRiley on Dec 13, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This little essay is exactly right. Hillary is just one more corporatist warmonger. She might be called a neo-liberal rather than a neo-conservative but the difference is completely insignificant in our desperate circumstances.
Stone Riley
www.stone60@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you're under 60 years of age
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Dec 13, 2007 2:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and you DIDN'T experiment with drugs, you're a chickenshit goody-two-shoes who's unfit for the rough-and-tumble world of elected office.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen to this - Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Amen to this - Posted by: anna132
» Except... Posted by: aonghus36
It is high time...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Dec 13, 2007 5:01 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the democratic party to merge with the republican party and for (a) new party(ies) to emerge...(pardon the pun(s)).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Molly Ivins Said It Best ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 14, 2007 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president.

Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone ...

Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges.

The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief."

- Molly Ivins

Read the whole speech here, you won't be disapointed ...

http://freepress.org/columns/display/1/2006/1304

I've read it many times, and I'll read it again ...
I truly miss her wit, her wisdom and her courage ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Molly Ivins Said It Best ... Posted by: When In Doubt
RAYGUN and KILLTON escalated the phoney "drug war" in the 80s and 90s.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 14, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for this decade, the phony "war on terror" seems to have hidden the escalation.

In any case, marijuana actually helps students study and learn whereas alcohol and tobacco SEVERELY IMPAIRS their critical thinking abilities.

By the way, you can thank the FAKE "Libertarians" for wasting time and money kissing Wall Street's ASSES instead of fighting against warfare, corporate welfare, erosion of freedom and other civil liberties, and this phony "drug war".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Swiss Cannabis Studies Posted by: aonghus36
Cowards the whole lot of them
Posted by: efficacy on Dec 14, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A politician's position on the drug war is a leading indicator of their character, or lack thereof.
Cliff Thornton

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs, legal and not
Posted by: dsmidiman on Dec 14, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole debate and "war" on drugs is yet another example of the incredible hypocracy that exists in our world. We spend millions and millions of dollars trying to stop people from smoking something that grows naturally out of the ground and is all organic. We do this because it is supposedly bad for us and because to be an upstanding productive person in society your not ever suppose to "feel good". Then we spend millions and millions more researching and developing pills and other medications so that we can "feel good"... It's just stupid!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong
Posted by: janelynne on Dec 14, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is another manufactured Hillary smear that has no basis in fact. This is evidence of the concerted corporate goal to undermine Hillary, all day every day, every hour. The American people don't hate her Hillary. She is NOT RACIST , NOT CLUELESS, and not CORPORATIST. Who made up that word? This is a smear swiftboat tactic invented to target Hillary. Corporations are destroying this country, and EVERY Candidate has to play the money game, ALL the Rethugs and all the Democrats. You cannot get on television without it. The corporations are trying to make sure Hillary doesn't get in and screw up their SWEET THANG. The MSM via the corporations are trying to reshape the election. Hillary is a great candidate who will take the action that terrifies NBC, GE and the others. Stop with the hourly, daily, Hillary hatefulness. She is not hated by the people. She is hated by the GOP and the corporations. If you are a Democrat, go after the Republican Congress that blocks all reforms. Or is that not really what you want to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wrong Posted by: VZEQICVA
» A few of her corporate sponsors... Posted by: lisaisalefty
» Notice the last person listed? Posted by: lisaisalefty
» RE: Wrong Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Wrong Bill and Hill Posted by: Lauren
Clinton is having problems leading her team, I hope if elected she can figure out how to do better
Posted by: unMomento on Dec 14, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Clinton would be a much better leader of her own camp, but it appears she can't even keep her own team inline to share the same vision. It seem like every couple of days one of them has to step down. It really seems like they are in panic mode.

Obama has take the higher ground, I think it is apparent he would be a much better leader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forget the Jackass Polsters Hillary - Time to Stand Up for Something!
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 14, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the problem with these Dems, they just want to be Repbulicans so bad. I have repeatedly called Hillary Bush Lite; if it's the Iraq war, or the incredibly idiotic "war on drugs," Hillary is just too often on the wrong side of these things. It boils down to the fact that Hillary and all politicians believe some kind of "objective consensus" exists in America on all the different issues. They use pollsters to figure out what this is so they can tailor their message to this. But, what they are missing is that we all, as a collective, define what the "objective consensus" is. Therefore, if the Dems, and Hillary, stood for something, it would resonate into its own consensus. And, that is all that it takes. The pathetic pandering to corporations (for contributions), the half-ass flip-flopping on Iraq, and the support for the squandering of billions for the idiotic "drug war," is it any wonder Americans are so apathetic. Please say this Hillary: I support universal single payer health care, I will end the "drug war" and the "Iraq war" immediately, I will cut the Pentagon's budget immediately by 50%, etc." Please say this instead of always listening to the jackass polsters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Notice the last person listed?
Posted by: lisaisalefty on Dec 14, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What was that about NBC?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jammer
Posted by: Jammer on Dec 14, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was the one thing that bugged me about Bill Clinton, his ardent support for the War on Drugs and I think HRC will be the same.However, I seriously doubt Obama can or will do anything about it given his comments designed to insulate him from his past use of drugs. He didnt say I didnt inhale, but he is trapped now in the same cage that prevents anyone on the liberal side from ending the War on Drugs. I am convinced, sadly, that the only way to end it is for conservative-libertarian Republicans to end it. While some of them have bravely come out and said its a failure (William Buckley) there are way too few of his ilk to make it work. I am resigned to it. However, dont deceive yourself into thinking that Obama has some sort of magic to take on this issue himself. He wont because he cant and so far he has not displayed the kind of issue leadership for totally new directions that would enable him to take this issue on. He talks about new directions and change, but look at his policies. They are mainstream DLC all the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jammer Posted by: Lauren
Edwards and/or Kucinich if we really want change.
Posted by: thekidde on Dec 14, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary is too beholden to the money power. Obama is too green. Edwards is against the corporatist robber barons and Kucinich is just ass-kicking on the status (sucky)quo. We need a sea change in this country not bullshit lite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Desperate Clinton
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Dec 14, 2007 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See Hillary Clinton's campaign falling apart. See how she employed a cheap shot attacking her opponent for drug use during his teens. Who cares? How many of you adults will ever admit to trying marijuana? Hillary, it's NOT a campaign issue.
I was going to vote for you, but not anymore. Is this the best your staff can do, conjure up a past episode? Ach du Himmel, frau Clinton, you're desperate. You need a time out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now Obama has Clinton's old staffers
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Dec 14, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does this say about Obama? It worries me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outrider
Posted by: outrider on Dec 14, 2007 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TRANSPARENCY - THE RULE OF LAW

The issue here is the rule of law, not marijuana. Did Obama break the law? If so to what extent - use, possession, sales, transportation, etc. and over what period of time? Obama argues for transparency and the rule of law. This is his chance. Anyway, confession is good for the soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outrider Posted by: tap17x
» everybody does Posted by: gellero
» RE: Outrider Posted by: efficacy
The Clinton Connection
Posted by: angelofdeath on Dec 14, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE TORRES-VIGNALI CONNECTION is explored in detail in a congressional report that resulted from Pardongate, when revelations surfaced that President Clinton granted clemency for Carlos Vignali Jr. — convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 15 years in federal prison in 1995 — along with other convicted criminals and one-time international fugitive Marc Rich. The granting of clemency occurred after payments were made to Clinton’s brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham, the brother of former first lady, New York state senator and 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Released in March 2002 by the congressional Committee on Government Reform, “Justice Undone: Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House” details Hugh Rodham’s involvement in the Vignali affair, as well as the long business history Vignali once shared with George Torres.

The report takes to task top L.A. elected officials, including county Supervisor Gloria Molina, then–state Senator Richard Polanco, then–state Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra, among others, for lobbying on behalf of Vignali Jr., in light of his drug conviction and the fact that DEA agents long suspected Vignali Sr. to be involved in drug trafficking — along with Torres. While a member of the California state Assembly, Villaraigosa wrote the first letter on Vignali’s behalf on May 24, 1996.


Saying Hillary Rodham Clinton was a leader who offered a new path, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa today formally endorsed the New York senator and former first lady in her race to become president of the United States.

Villaraigosa will also serve as one of the four national chairs of Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, it was announced.

At a televised news conference from the UCLA campus in Westwood, Villaraigosa praised Clinton’s approach to domestic issues, particularly education, and her pledge to help end the war in Iraq. The pair earlier toured the preschool at UCLA’s Krieger Center. — La Times

http://mayorvillaraigosasdemons.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PARDONS???
Posted by: gellero on Dec 14, 2007 11:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the Pres pardoned a few people, for whatever reason. So what.....they're not axe murderers. It's his right. Who's to say that's not justice, anyway. Hillary's just calling in her markers. More power to her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternatives or Alternation?
Posted by: talkville on Dec 15, 2007 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Precisely during the '90's, under the Mr part of the Clinton dynastic epoch, the prison industry exploded adding about 2-1/2 million "new" faces to the watchful eyes of the Correctional and Policing institutions of this country. Under this watchful Chief Executive Officer, NAFTA and other carefully crafted Neo-liberal assaults on working peoples were implemented and expanded. The Telecom Reform of 1996 unleashed the consolidation and expansion of technological domination by Corporate and Financial Capital still on-going and getting stronger. With easy triangulating smiles, the Mr. part of this duo removed the last vestiges of the State's constitutional objective of "providing for the public welfare", in favor of un-restricted, un-ruly, anarchic and triumphalist financial capitalism.

The only interest the Clintons, like the Bushes, have in the working and middling classes is to be found in their strategies for managing them in service to the bonus-laden status quo. The Mrs. part of this dynasty cannot be expected to be significantly different. Consider well your own real and actual interests; vote accordingly in 2008. When drug policies punish the users and protect the providers one must ask deeper questions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Is Wrong With You People
Posted by: tommy1957 on Dec 17, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So I have read numerous anti-Clinton articles very little negativity on the other candidates. I am beginning to think these negative attacks are being orchestrated by covert republican operatives. It is a known fact that the republican weenies can not stand the Clintons. Why because they interrupted their plans to totally dominate the US political landscape with their version of conservatism. This turns out to be nothing more than political corruption; corporate welfare; baseless wars; and closet homosexuals and child molesters under the banner of god loves republicans. Let us stay focused on the bigger picture; who ever the nominee is for the Democratic Party - WE MUST SUPPORT THEM. The alternatives are the crazies who are running on the other side of the isle. Now that would be disastrous.
Thank You

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]