Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Iran Halted Nuclear Weapons Program in '03, Unlikely to Develop a Weapon This Decade

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 1:00 PM on December 3, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: This National Intelligence Estimate was reportedly completed a year ago but was blocked by the White House.
bushiran

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, orignally appeared on Think Progress

A new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) released today concludes with "high confidence" that "in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program." From the report's findings:

We assess with moderate confidence Tehran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.

We continue to assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Iran does not currently have a nuclear weapon.

Tehran's decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005.

The intelligence community's 2005 assessment concluded, inaccurately, that "Iran currently is determined to develop nuclear weapons" and "could produce enough fissile material for a weapon by the end of this decade." But as the new NIE finds, Iran is unlikely to achieve this capability until after 2015 "because of foreseeable technical and programmatic problems."

This new NIE is long overdue. It was reportedly completed a year ago, but blocked by the White House. IPS reported:

A National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran has been held up for more than a year in an effort to force the intelligence community to remove dissenting judgments on the Iranian nuclear programme, and thus make the document more supportive of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's militarily aggressive policy toward Iran.

As ThinkProgress has documented, the White House's manipulation of the Iran NIE bore a striking resemblance to the controversies that played out over pre-war Iraq intelligence.

But even with Cheney's meddling, this NIE makes it clear that there is no imminent danger from Iran's nuclear program. Newsweek's Howard Fineman recently reported that the intelligence community is trying to send a message to "slow down what the president, most particularly the vice president" in what they "want to do in Iran."

UPDATE: National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley "quickly issued a statement describing the N.I.E. as containing positive news rather than reflecting intelligence mistakes. 'It confirms that we were right to be worried about Iran seeking to develop nuclear weapons,' Mr. Hadley said."

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, nie, bush, cheney, hadley, nuclear weapons

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good News
Posted by: JSquercia on Dec 3, 2007 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First I am stunned that the report has seen the light of day . Second I am hardly surprized that Handley would interpet the idea that we are NOT sure of Iran's intentions as confirming the White House Point of View . This guy was afterall Condi second in command when SHE was seeing Aluminum Tubes as devices that could ONLY be used for enriching Uranium when they were in truth meant to be everyday rocket luanchers . He was in forefront of arguing to invade Iraq from the moment Dubya removed his hand from the Bible

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I guess...
Posted by: adp3d on Dec 4, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...we now know the reason Cheney wanted to take Valerie Plame off the board. I can see the NYT Op-Ed now..."What I didn't find in Iran".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran, Israel, Cheney and Hillary
Posted by: herbal on Dec 5, 2007 12:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article (also reported in NYT and Washington Post) on Hadley's announcement is the best news in months. This may represent a coup on the part of the intelligence agencies against VP Cheney. This is a strong indication that, along with the Pentagon, there are many sane people in security cleared positions who take the Iran attack threat very seriously and are doing what they can to stop the plans. We can also hope they are for preservation of US Constitution.

Please search U Tube by keying in "Hillary Clinton AIPAC" for her speech advocating nuclear bombing of Iran to make the world safe for Israel. Democrats are insane to contemplate the candidacy of Ms. Clinton, the apologist for the Bush Administration. Look at her perfect Bush agenda voting record; Iraq war authorization votes, Patriot Act (twice), tax cut bills for the rich, Homeland Security Act and others. This woman is a stealth Republican and corporatist. The Republican owned media will proceed to brand all other Democratic contenders as un-electable as they did for their most pro-Wall Street choice, Kerry, in 2004. Hillary needs to be discredited now as the hawk and AIPAC agent she is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]