Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Real Reason Trent Lott Is Leaving Early

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 11:00 AM on November 26, 2007.


Matt Corley: Lott seeks to join the "lucrative world of lobbying Congress" before "tougher restrictions" take effect.
trentlottmg5
LOTT

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Matt Corley, originally appeared on Think Progress

Earlier today, news broke that Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS) intends "to resign his seat before the end of the year." Lott will explain his plans in two news conferences in his home state of Mississippi later today.

Though the reasons for Lott's resignation are still unknown, a "congressional official" told the AP that "there is nothing amiss with Lott's health" and that "the senator has 'other opportunities' he plans to pursue." NBC News reports that Lott's "other opportunities" involve joining the "lucrative world of lobbying Congress" before "tougher restrictions in a new lobbying law" take effect:

While the exactly reason Lott is stepping down before he finishes his term is unknown, the general speculation is that a quick departure immunizes Lott against tougher restrictions in a new lobbying law that takes effect at the end of the year. That law would require Senators to wait two-years before entering the lucrative world of lobbying Congress.
"A Lott friend" confirmed to the Politico that the new lobbying law is "a factor in the timing" of his resignation.

Lott, whose son is a lobbyist, was part of a small bloc of conservatives who voted against the ethics reform bill in August that included the two-year revolving door ban. His vote reflected his longtime position as an opponent of lobbying reform. Here are a few more examples of Lott's defense of his potential, soon-to-be job:
- In Jan. 2006, Lott praised "the practice of secretly inserting special projects into spending bills at the behest of lobbyists," calling it "an effective way for Congress to address a problem or need back home."
- In Feb. 2006, Lott derided the effort to fix lobbying loopholes after the Jack Abramoff scandal as "the usual over reaction that we see happen quite often in Washington."
- In March 2006, Lott voted against establishing a Senate Office of Public Integrity.
- In March 2006, when Congress sought to ban free meals from lobbyists, Lott defended the free meals, saying a ban would imply "that we can be had for the price of a lunch or dinner."

Lott's defense of lobbyists should come as no surprise considering how well they treated him while in office. Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that Lott topped "the list of current lawmakers who have most frequently been jetted around the country aboard the luxurious private jets of Corporate America."

Now, with tougher restrictions looming, Lott appears likely to pass through the revolving door to take the type of "lucrative" lobbying job that he fought so hard in the Senate to protect.

Digg!

Tagged as: corruption, lott, republican party, lobbying

Matt Corley is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Strip-Club Owner Opens Dog Shelter Named After Newt Gingrich
The idea was born when Gingrich retracted an “Entrepreneur of the Year” award he accidentally presented to Dallas strip club owner Dawn Rizos last year.
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 27, 2009.
Wingnuts Cite Lunatic Message Board Commenters as Authorities on Climate Science
Innovative!
Post by Thers. November 27, 2009.
State Dinner Crashers: Reality Show Dupes Secret Service?
Michaele and Tareq Salahi weren't invited to the White House dinner. But they got in anyway. Threats to Obama's life are four times those faced by Bush -- so how did this happen?
Post by Adele Stan. November 27, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?