Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Romney Launches Campaign Against Honesty

Posted by GottaLaff , Brave New Films at 5:12 AM on November 26, 2007.


GottaLaff: Obama's admission that he inhaled marijuana as a youth has Romney all worked up.
19332

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by GottaLaff, originally appeared on Cliff Schecter's Brave New Films

He's being honest. Swift boat him.

Earlier this week in New Hampshire Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama spoke candidly about his past experimentation with drugs and alcohol in high school, and on Saturday--after a question on medicinal marijuana--Obama was prodded a bit further and asked whether or not he had ever inhaled.

"I did," the senator from Illinois said to light applause. "It's not something I'm proud of. It was a mistake as a young man."

The "mistake", according to Mitt Romney, includes Obama's public frankness. It could have--dun dun dunnn -- repercussions.

The question was a reference to a line made famous by former President Bill Clinton who, while admitting to trying marijuana, said he did not inhale.

"I never understood that line," Obama continued. "The point was to inhale. That was the point."

It certainly is was. Did I say "is"? Well, that depends on what the definition of "is" is. Don't ask, don't tell.

Here come the repercussions:

On the campaign trail on Saturday, GOP White House hopeful Mitt Romney said Obama's earlier comments set a bad example for young people.

Is Mitt against honesty? That's unAmerican! Support the troops! 9/11! Makin' progr-- oops. Sorry. I nearly got sucked into the Republican Black Hole of pseudo-patriotism.

On the issue of medicinal marijuana, Obama said that if the "best way to relieve pain and suffering is through medicinal marijuana," then it's something he's open to.

Just think of the possibilities: "Take a hit and call me in the morning."

He added it would concern him much more if people were allowed to grow their own to use whenever they were simply "feeling really tense" and "needed a joint."

Well, as long as they don't inhale, what could it hurt?

Digg!

Tagged as: election08, romney, obama. marijuana, medicinal marijuana, drugs

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Latino Migrant Beaten to Death in Penn
A predictable outcome of the overheated immigration debate in this country.
Post by yave begnet. July 24, 2008.
House Hearing on 2004's Lessons Sheds No New Light on Flawed Election
Old arguments and explanations abound about the last presidential election.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 24, 2008.
McCain: Time to Start Rationing Veterans' Healthcare
'McCain received a grade of D from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and a 20 percent vote rating from the Disabled Veterans of America.'
Post by Steve Benen. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
yep
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 26, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honesty and sanity are bad examples. Yep, that says it all about Romney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When, oh when, will this pot-hating end?
Posted by: Aimleft on Nov 26, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, so yay that Obama admitted to inhaling. When are we gonna get someone who isn't afraid to admit they are NOT ashamed of what they did then (or perhaps still do now?)

It is just incredible to me the continued ostracization and criminalization of marijuana. It's just preposterous. Thirty plus years ago I would've bet my right arm it would've been totally legalized, once those of us who knew about its relative harmlessness "grew up" and began to have a say in some of the laws that "run" this country. But no. Sadly mistaken. So it's this huge thing for Obama to admit he inhaled - and something for dickhead Romney to jump on (bandwagons, anyone?. I'm so sick about the total lack of honesty out there, as far as finding someone who will tell it like it is, when it comes to the "evil weed," which is that it is infinitely less harmful than legal alcohol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Truth About Marijuana
Posted by: neilemac on Nov 26, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This issue is so out of whack with reality. Here's the real dirt on why the dreaded 'weed' is illegal. Yep, another conspiracy! When will the sheeple awaken and realize the truth about everything heard and perpetually spun by the big corporactocracy media headed by those of similar ilk in this tale copied and pasted below from another site, and already over a decade old.

The actual story behind the legislature passed against marijuana is quite surprising. According to Jack Herer, author of The Emperor Wears No Clothes and an expert on the "hemp conspiracy," the acts bringing about the demise of hemp were part of a large conspiracy involving DuPont, Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and many other influential industrial leaders such as William Randolph Hearst and Andrew Mellon. Herer notes that the Marijuana Tax Act, which passed in 1937, coincidentally occurred just as the decoricator machine was invented. With this invention, hemp would have been able to take over competing industries almost instantaneously. According to Popular Mechanics, "10,000 acres devoted to hemp will produce as much paper as 40,000 acres of average [forest] pulp land." William Hearst owned enormous timber acreage, land best suited for conventional pulp, so his interest in preventing the growth of hemp can be easily explained. Competition from hemp would have easily driven the Hearst paper-manufacturing company out of business and significantly lowered the value of his land. Herer even suggests popularizing the term "marijuana" was a strategy Hearst used in order to create fear in the American public. "The first step in creating hysteria was to introduce the element of fear of the unknown by using a word that no one had ever heard of before... 'marijuana'" (ibid).

From The Truth About Marijuana

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA STRETCHES THINGS JUST A LITTLE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 26, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't take on Hillary, so bring Bill into it. Cheap shot. People in a certain age group are nore likely than not to have smoked pot. We should get over it. But Obama has other demons. Too many to suit me. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Romney, what about your boys?
Posted by: Astroboy on Nov 26, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe someone should ask Romney if his boys ever smoked marijuana. I'm sure some of their classmates and friends would vouch for them. That they have, I mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But then again...
Posted by: Astroboy on Nov 26, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...maybe the boys never have smoked pot. Sizing up Romney's family, maybe they could be that fucking square!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But then again... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: But then again... Posted by: Elbeau
» RE: But then again... Posted by: Astroboy
» RE: But then again... Posted by: Elbeau
Oh...you're all so gullible
Posted by: Elbeau on Nov 26, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll agree that it wasn't Mitt's shining moment when he responded to Obama...but listen to yourselves line up behind Obama for this.

Obama did not "confess" to this in response to a question about drugs or alcahol. He purposfully brought up the issue in front of high school students in order to grab a headline and send guys like Mitt and Guliani scrambling for positions.

It was quite a brilliant political move really...Obama knew from President Billy's history that America would not care that he had done drugs. He also knew that it would show stark contrasts between his self-proclaimed honesty and HillBillary's well-known deceits (ie: "I didn't inhale").

The fact that Guliani jumped at the chance to turn skeletons in the closet into campaign slogans and that Romney came across as endorsing candidates hiding the truth was really just a bonus for him.

So, in the end...sure Romney responded wrong...but PLEASE don't give Obama credit for this one. It was calculated to have the effect that you're seeing in this blog...and it was done in front of high-school students...on purpose for political gain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wow, Elbow Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: Wow, Elbow Posted by: Elbeau
» RE: Wow, Elbow Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Wow, Elbow Posted by: Lauren
jimmymack
Posted by: jimmymack 2 on Nov 26, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until this Clintonesque "inhaled" obfuscation there was only one reason I found it impossible to support Obama - his fraternizing with churches and preachers- a bad crowd from recent experience. How right wing does he feel it will be necessary to become over the next year? It's POT, not selling arms to Saudis, not awarding port security to a Dubai conglomerate, not anything approaching current presidential crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just saw a Dewer's ad.
Posted by: Lauren on Nov 26, 2007 8:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To celebrate the 75th anniversary of the repeal of prohibition!
I think they said Dec. 5th. Yeah baby, repeal prohibition!

Party responsibly.

I think they often make TV ads in 24 hours or less these days.

It is bazaar to live in such an interactive, high speed, plastic world. Like seeing the red letter guy on Tucker today - I remember him! Our biblical conversation. Go dude! He was one of the most prepared guests I have ever seen on that show. I am glad Tucker just let him talk, it was informative. Wow! What a concept.

The sound stage had really been classed up too. Snazzy Tucker, good show today. How do Libertarians feel about the right to OWN other (usually female) people? THAT is the real, $64,000 question, hiding under all the sturm und drang in the abortion issue.

Who gets to decide what SHE does with her body? Who owns her?

It is an interesting question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]