Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McClellan Goes From Coming Clean to Getting Dirty

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 6:06 AM on November 22, 2007.


Richard Blair: Scott McClellan is now hedging on his own accusations, who got to him?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Richard Blair, originally appeared on The All Spin Zone

Click for larger version
(click for larger version)

Ok, who got to Scottie? He's spinning the words in his book as fast as he ever spun the lies of the Bush administration. Surprised?

Well, ya knew it was too good to be true. A BushCo insider, a "made man", ratting out the boss? It didn't take Scott McClellan long to backtrack on the excerpt made public yesterday from his upcoming book.

Can you say, "damage control"?

WASHINGTON - Former White House spokesman Scott McClellan does not believe President Bush lied to him about the role of White House aides I. Lewis Scooter Libby or Karl Rove in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, according to McClellan's publisher.

Peter Osnos, the founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan's book in April, tells NBC from his Connecticut home that McCLellan, "Did not intend to suggest Bush lied to him."

The excerpt published Tuesday seemed pretty straightforward. It makes one wonder who got to Scottie today.

Digg!

Tagged as: books, bush, rove, libby, mcclellan

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


The Final Debate: A Minute-by-Minute Analysis
Here's what happened at the third -- and final -- presidential debate.
Post by Staff. October 15, 2008.
In Financial Crisis, America's Plutocrats Are Hurting Too
Won't somebody think of the CEOs?
Post by Steve M.. October 15, 2008.
Obama's fiercest opponent in Ohio? Misinformation and Prejudice
Small town McCain/ Palin Ohioans reveal hate, fear and racism in the American midwest.
Post by Casey Kauffman. October 15, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What do you expect from McClellan?
Posted by: Intellect on Nov 22, 2007 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you expect from McClellan?
An honest or atoning Bushie?

He knew when he was lying and when he wasn't - you could see it in his uneasiness when he said things he knew weren't true.

He was part of the conspiracy and obviously the Bushies have threatened him now.

The only way the American people will ever get to the truth is with the Impeachment of Bush and Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do you expect from McClellan? sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
First thoughts
Posted by: lavonneann on Nov 22, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McClellan, late but finally.
After this latest, Who got to them, what was threatened?
Latest thought, McClellan had better watch his back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course they got to him, but...
Posted by: Astroboy on Nov 22, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...what I want to know is, while noticing the caption below McClellan's picture, "click to enlarge", could that gigantic head get any bigger?!?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

click for a larger version of what?
Posted by: blitzmesser on Nov 22, 2007 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scott knew when he wrote his book that it would put him in trouble. Having worked in the white house certainly showed him what happens to those who leave the flock.
But having said something once and then taking it back does not make it disappear. The seed is sown. Possibly he did it on purpose to alert those people who did not believe that the bushies could be so corrupt, but then "takes it back" so he won't be done in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The liars club.
Posted by: JayMagoo on Nov 23, 2007 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A gathering of the Bush administration is like a meeting of the Liars' Club. If somebody tells you what time it it -- check your watch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]