Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Refuses to Condemn Saudi Court’s Punishment of Gang Rape Victim

Posted by Faiz Shakir, Think Progress at 7:43 AM on November 22, 2007.


Faiz Shakir: Apparently, there is some negotiability in Bush's demands for human freedom.
bushabdullahc220x210shkl
Bush

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Faiz Shakir, originally appeared on Think Progress

In his second inaugural address, President Bush stridently declared that his administration would not compromise on its demand for basic human rights:

We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend...that women welcome humiliation and servitude.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice referred to these goals as the "non-negotiable demands of human dignity." But a recent Saudi court decision has shown the administration very willing to fold when this rhetoric is tested.

A week ago, a Saudi appeals court increased the punishment for the female victim of a gang rape. The woman, who had been appealing her original sentence of 90 lashes, was sentenced to six months in prison and 200 lashes after her appeal.

The Saudi judges more than doubled the punishment for the victim because of "her attempt to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media." The Saudi Justice Ministry confirmed that the stiffer sentence handed out on appeal stemmed from the fact that the victim had gone to the media with her story. "Media may have adverse effects on the other parties involved in the case," a statement said.

Asked to offer the administration's position on the court ruling, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said on Monday that the administration was "astonished," but had "nothing else to offer":
QUESTION: A very quick question also from this morning. Your comment, please, on -- in reaction to the young Saudi woman having her sentence more than doubled the -
MR. MCCORMACK: Right, yeah. I saw the news reports and I guess the first thing to say is, while this is a judicial procedure, part of a judicial procedure overseas in the courts of a sovereign country, that said,I think that most would find this relatively astonishing that something like this happened. So while it's very difficult to offer -- you know, offer any detailed comment about the situation, I think most people would really be quite astonished by the situation.
QUESTION: Would you like the Saudi authorities to reconsider it or do you encourage them to do that?
MR. MCCORMACK: Look, you know, again, I can't get involved in specific court cases in Saudi Arabia dealing with its own citizens, but most -- I think most people here would be quite surprised to learn of the circumstances and then the punishment meted out.
QUESTION: Does that mean that the State Department is astonished by it, too?
MR. MCCORMACK: I'll leave the answer where it -
QUESTION: Well, what does "most people" mean? I mean, most of who?
MR. MCCORMACK: I would just leave -- I don't have anything else to offer.

Yesterday, McCormack was asked if the administration's silence was "driven by a desire not to offend Saudi Arabia as a close ally." "No, it's -- no, that's not it at all," he claimed, but then acknowledged the administration has yet to convey its "astonishment" directly to the Saudis. "I am not aware of any direct contact with the Saudis on this issue," he said.

Apparently, there is some negotiability in Bush's demands for human freedom.

UPDATE: The Muslim American Society Freedom called the court ruling "a clear violation of the compassion and mercy taught by the religion of Islam."

UPDATE II: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) states, "I urge President Bush to call on King Abdullah to cancel the ruling and drop all charges against this woman." In a letter to Condoleezza Rice, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) wrote, "I strongly urge the Department of State to condemn this ruling." Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) and John Edwards released statements expressing their outrage.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, women, rape, saudi arabia, criminal justice

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Editor of ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report.


Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
That figures
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 22, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Admn can't muster enough outrage to condemn the woman's sentence or to use the administration's influence to pressure the Saudis to do what is good and right?
Well, THAT figures!
I KNEW the Admn would not speak out strongly on this. And it is no surprise that the Republican presidential candidates have been relatively quiet on this too, while the Democrats have given lip-service at least to criticizing Saudi Arabia.
Maybe the administration hasn't spoken more forcibly on this issue because those who live in white houses shouldn't throw stones. Hmmmm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY NOT ASK LAURA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 22, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George is no mystery here. These men are his close friends. I'm not convinced that he thinks they're wrong. But the First Lady should definitely be asked to weigh in on this.She was young once and has two young daughters. She must have an opinion. Let's hear it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHY NOT ASK LAURA Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: WHY NOT ASK LAURA Posted by: tempus
He also refused to admit the Muslim Turk genocide of mainly Christian
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 22, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Armenians (as well as other ethnic groups who were Christian such as Orthodox Greeks). Bush steadfastly refuses to comment on the violent, backwards religion of Islam. Of course, this is nothing new. Clinton gave arms and money to Moslem terrorists in the Balkans and even invaded, bombed, and killed the Serbs who were defending their homeland and Europe (once again.) Clinton went so far to defend Moslems as to force a stand-off with Russia at the airport (remember that one) and bomb the Chinese Embassy when those countries expressed dismay over the US support for radical Moslem terrorists. So the US policy is not changed. Ever since Carter we've supported, used, and armed the most radical of the Moslems and allowed them to spread the evil religion. Keep in mind that Bush family has strong connections with the Saudi family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Supporting bad guys Posted by: thekidde
» RE: Supporting bad guys Posted by: Turiye
» RE: Supporting bad guys Posted by: davewuxi
» Moslem vs Muslim vs 'whatever'. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Saudi Arabia
Posted by: Joe on Nov 22, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Saddam's Iraq with a better PR campaign. I would almost rather take my chances in Iraq over Saudi Arabia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aren't religious fundamentalists
Posted by: thekidde on Nov 22, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wonderful? Whether Muslim, Christian, Jewish or whatever, f*ucknuts who follow bigotted, misogynist, supernatural stupidity seem to wind up being murderers, batterers, psychopathic nutjobs, etc. But that's okay, the Bushites are selling $20B worth of killing machines to Saudi Arabia and upping to murder tools to Israel to $30B. Maybe all these wackos will kill each other and leave the rest of us in peace - oops. Forgot about the radical right wing evangelical psychopaths in the US. Guess we'll have find some way to get rid of their nastiness too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jenna and Barbara,
Posted by: thekidde on Nov 22, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's daughters, should then be caned for being drunks and driving. If they've been screwing around, maybe execution just like in Saudi Arabia - what arrogance and ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bush administration whores
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 22, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
know better than to badmouth their pimps.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

here come the little green footballs bigots
Posted by: noalternative on Nov 22, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to turn this into a muslim-arab bashing moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

buy citgo gas
Posted by: noalternative on Nov 22, 2007 1:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hugo doesn't do this to Venezuelan women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: buy citgo gas Posted by: Turiye
» RE: AND? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: buy citgo gas Posted by: jvaljon1
Well of COURSE...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Nov 22, 2007 10:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't surprise me in the least, that Bush's best buds in the Arab world--the Saudis--are the same kind of scumbags that he is.

Shouldn't surprise anyone else, either, that Bush would never weigh in by asking the Saudi leadership (with whom he meets regularly) to please forego this atrocity, and let the poor woman live. (Yah--BTW, that IS a death sentence)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is NOW?
Posted by: scheherezade on Nov 23, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We expect Chimpy to ignore topics like this.

But where are NOW and the Feminist Majority Foundation?

Nothing whatsoever's posted on either website, nor have we heard any kind of statement from those two organizations on this globally visible subject.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saudi,Saudi,Saudi
Posted by: Denver Dem on Nov 23, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Osama: Saudi.
15 of the 19 911 hijackers: Saudi.
Afghan terrorists: Saudi.
Iraq terrorists: Saudi.
The most violent version of the Qu'ran: Saudi.
Islamic fundamentlism: Saudi.
Sharia law: Saudi.

Most of the violence in the Middle East is funded by Saudis.

Our "allies" don't cha know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask Laura?!?!?
Posted by: tempus on Nov 23, 2007 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask Laura? You mean during the one hour a day she's sober? You must be joking. That creature has no opinions and no mind (how else would it be possible to have married the Troglodyte and stayed married to him?). And no, Anna, dear, those men are not Bush's 'close friends', they are the cartels that OWN and FUCK him hourly. he is their bought and paid for PUPPET, so it isn't too surprising that their atrocities go uncondemned. From the worst, most venal, most corrupt, most sickeningly evil 'president' in history, nothing else could ever be expected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]