Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Would Wolf Blitzer Want Hillary to Win?

Posted by Manila Ryce, The Largest Minority at 12:00 PM on November 19, 2007.


Manila Ryce: Blitzer was a propagandist within a powerful pro-Israeli organization before he came to CNN.
Wolf Blitzer= Zionist

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Manila Ryce, originally appeared on The Largest Minority

In honor of the terrific job Wolf Blitzer and CNN did in moderating the most recent "debate" in Las Vegas, I thought I'd dig out this blast from the past.

In a recent episode of Hardball, Ed Schultz was asked why he thought Wolf would want Hillary to be elected president. One reason could be that she's the most pro-war candidate who supports Israel's ongoing occupation, ethnic cleansing, and oppression of the Palestinian people. Of course, "Hardball" is anything but, so you're not allowed to say those sorts of things. As Clinton stated in the last debate, she favors security over freedom, just as the Zionists and Neocons do. Here's one disgusting speech in which she declares her unconditional support for the inhumane practices of the Israeli government.

Blitzer himself is a former editor of AIPACs monthly publication, the "Near East Report". It doesn't look good when a network which claims to be "the most trusted name in news" hires a propagandist within such a powerful pro-Israeli organization to disseminate "objective journalism" to the American people. Hopefully, the following debate can offer some context to the abomination we saw just a few nights ago. Corporations such as Time Warner are pure tyrannies. It is in their best interest to crush democracy by limiting legitimate debate within our society. They too believe as Hillary does, that the importance of their security trumps the freedoms of the many.

The video to your right is from a forum in 1989 that was titled "The Intifada within the American, Israeli, Islamic Triangle". Professor Norman Finkelstein (one of those heretical "self-hating Jews" like Chomsky and Zinn) consistently destroys Blitzer in a cool and concise way. Also, pay attention to the way Wolf speaks along with the false arguments he puts forth. You can just as easily picture his tired talking points coming out of the mouth of any mainstream American politician.

Digg!

Tagged as: election08, clinton, blitzer, middle east, palestine, israel

Manila Ryce is a regular blooger for The Largest Minority


Hallmark Gets Down with Same-Sex Marriage
Now same-sex couples can receive incredibly earnest cards at their weddings too.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. August 21, 2008.
McCain Office Is Sent White Powder, Threat
CBS: McCain's campaign office in Denver, CO has received a letter containing a threat and "an amount of white powder in it"
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Iran: NBA Succeeds Where Bush Administration Failed
You can assume that NBA teams won't be calling in Condoleezza Rice to help with negotiations.
Post by Faiz Shakir. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Exactly
Posted by: opeluboy on Nov 19, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been saying much the same thing this writer bravely states about both Blitzer and Clinton, but usually end up being pummeled as a Jew-hater (I no longer use the co-opted term "anti-Semite"). And while I am obviously in agreement, Blitzer and Clinton are only symptoms of a larger issue.

That Blitzer, a Zionist Jew that worked for AIPAC and the Jerusalem Post might be biased in favor of that little parasitic country should be news to no one. That Clinton feels the need, like most of our gutless and amoral politicians, to suck the dick of whatever Israeli representaive, Prime Minister or AIPAC agent is currently standing before her should also come as no surprise.

What should be addressed is why this is so.

Why does this tiny country have so much power over our government? Why do politicans quake at the fleeting thought of standing up to Israeli intransigence, brutality and illegality?

For the same reason a Wolf Blitzer can be on a major network explaining the Middle East to us.

They, the Zionist Jews, own the media. Period.

Pretend they don't. Deny that they do. Call it "over-representation" if you want. Accuse me of being a Protocols believer. But it's a fact, and it's a fact that every Jew in Hollywood, New York publishing, the music business and the American news media knows to be true.

And if you control the media, you have the politicians by the balls, or in Hillary's case, I suppose it would be the short hairs.

A final point. My problem is with ZIONIST Jews having control of the media in this country, not Jews in general. I would be delighted if Finkelstein, Avnery, Zinn or Chomsky owned the major networks, publshing houses, etc.

They don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xactly Posted by: spratling
Self-loathing (or sometimes self-hating) Jew?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 19, 2007 7:32 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is an interesting phenomena. The Zionist criminals support, and likely fund, racist and "anti-semitic" groups so that the Zionist crimes can never be questioned or examined. It is VERY important for ADL, and Zionists, that there is continued 'attacks' on Jews so that the opportunity for the Holocaust and persections of Jews can be referenced in the media, schools, etc. Obviously sympathy would follow and remind us, yet again, that these people cannot be questioned or criticised.

Likewise any Jew who goes against the zionist-banker interests will be dubbed "self-loathing" or "self-hating" as a way to invoke pity on the poor fool who must have some deep-seeded mental, or emotional, problem. Don't listen to him. He is really mentally and emotionally screwed up.

These people are very clever and their machinations have been going on for centuries without much public oversight. They have created, at least in the USA and Western Europe, a system in which they cannot be criticised. They also exploit, take much financial gain from, and control much of the Western countries yet never will have any allegience to Western countries, or their people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The SITUATION ROOM is Wolf Blitzer's show
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Nov 20, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Geez, do these writer's fact check before they send their writing's out into the world to let it known that they do not?

She states, "Hardball" is anything but. . ."

Uh, That would be Chris MATTHEWS show on MSNBC and yes, it IS "Hardball," if you knew what show you were talking about when you wrote the piece.

The Situation Room lobs softballs that were most likely planted or, like the "$64 Question" provided with the answer before being asked of the "guest"/propagandist.

The best thing on CNN is Michael Ware, the Australian Journalist who calls it like he sees it, even going so far as to say Bush must be watching the wrong war if he thinks the Surge is working. Too bad he doesn't move over to MSNBC so I can watch him again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blitzer liker Hillary?
Posted by: johnp on Nov 20, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the author thinks Blitzer wants Hillary to be president is beyond me. I get the opposite impression. Every time I have the misfortune of hearing that little twerp on TV, with his whiny, robotic voice, I hear him repeatedly looking for anything he can find to hurt Hillary's campaign. Now I see this author telling me that Blitzer wants her to win. Not only that, apparently readers of his views have been anxiously waiting to hear this nonsense, so they can join in agreement. The world has gone mad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blitzer liker Hillary? Posted by: Lauren
DUH Time Warner Owns This Corporate Candidiate...
Posted by: snooper on Nov 20, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time Warner is one of Clinton's top ten contributors. She is a corporate candidate. We will never see fairness on television regarding hillary, they are doing her favors as much as possible (net neutrality? FORGET IT under Hillary!)

Not only that, but didn't anyone else notice Wolf's slant on Global Warming - a done deal - and "clean coal" was their top sponsor (and is, on the website too)... How convenient that one of Hillary's top five, Citigroup, is funding dirty coal plants to the tune of tens of billions. They all have the same agenda.

This is why John Edwards makes so much sense, he owes them NOTHING and so that's why he gets so little attention from Big Media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and you wonder why people use therm "antisemite"?
Posted by: zanychris on Nov 20, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Um..Jews running the media? Oh, I forgot, only the bad Jews (Zionists!). Do you realize that there are many people who identify as Zionist that HATE AIPAC and are working hard for a just resolution to the conflict.

But it probvably does not matter to you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wolf Blitzer ? Who cares ?
Posted by: hadashito on Nov 20, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blitzer, like Russert, is a half wit. Except for Olbermann on MSNBC, there isn't a single regularly appearing cable news anchor, or news reader worth the attention of a 6th grader. The broadcast channel anchors on NBC, and maybe ABC, when allowed to display their real intelligence and experience are worthy of the name of news anchor. The rest are creatures of the infotainment phenomenon are worthless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wolf Blitzer ? Who cares ? Posted by: davidstill
In agreement
Posted by: heinz57 on Nov 20, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That no one seems to name-call and stereotype more, when it comes to dissagreement of Israeli/Palistinian policy than a Zionist. Hillary Clinton will be lobbied to continue the annual $91 Billion dollars of U.S. aid to Isreal, and she will talk a mean streak to get the Jewish vote by not upsetting the applecart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S THE CRIMINAL SETTLEMENTS - POINT!
Posted by: pierrot on Dec 2, 2007 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How would Blitzer and any Zionist justify the presence of the civil(!) settlements in the occupied territories - even NOW, 20 years later?

These are flagrant and permanent violatios of the Geneva Convention and of countless unanimous UN resolutions ... does anyone in the zinonist controlled US madia and in the zionist controlled US government care??

These systematic violations of international law in favor of Israel alone is proof of the complete control by the zionist maffia of US media and government.

What have these obviousely criminal, racist, fascist settlements to do with Israels security? NOTHING! Most obviousely these illegal settlers, including 100'00 women and children, are a massive provocation for the Palestinians which rightfully try to defend their land stolen by the Zionist settlers.

Logically then these criminal settlements have therefore to be heavily guarded by its armed inhabitants and by the military making them virtually inataccable.

Therefore in their desperation thebPalestinians are by necessity attacking Israel in the mainland with suicide attacks which in turn lead to even more repression of the Palestinians by the zionist by building an ugly wall on Palestinian(!) land.

And then after all this horror and decade long provocation and land steeling and systematic strangling of millions of perfectly innocent Palestinians, Israel is accusing them of killing 'innocent'(!) women and children.

There are a hundred times more innocent Palestinian women and children dying at the hands of the hugely superior israeli army ... and then:

If Israel wants to stop the killing of israeli citizens why dont they pull down the illegal settlements which are the primary cause?

Israel could easily bring the palestinian suicide bombings to a halt by abandoning all the illegal, facist, racist settlements.Obviouse, isn't it? But they wont! They NEVER will, because they want Erez Israel, the Great Israel, at any cost and the so called 'innocent victims' which Israel could easily prevent by adhereing to international law,are simply CANNON FODDER for them, sacrificed on the altar of zionism.


Shame on Wulf Blitzer, on AIPAC, the jewish lobby, on Senator Liebermann, on(why the hell?) Hillary, on Wolfowotz, jailed Abramowitz, and all the evangelical pseudochristian zionists and Condy and (why the hell)Tony Blair and the biggest hypocrite criminal of all, Georg W. Bush! ... and the devil in person, 'Adolf' Cheeny!

And long live Jimmy Carter and Profs. Mearsheimer and Finkelstein

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]