Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Edwards Tops Iowa Independent Democratic Power Rankings

Posted by Adam Howard, AlterNet at 1:00 PM on November 16, 2007.


Adam Howard: While the media goes ga-ga for Hillary and Obama, Edwards is quietly gaining momentum in Iowa.
senatorjohnedwards000

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

While the mainstream press hammers away constantly on its Hillary vs. Barack, Barack or Hillary narrative, John Edwards has consistently and quietly maintained a strong presence at or near the top of the Iowa caucus polls. Now a new analysis from the Iowa Independent should give those that support his campaign a new reason to celebrate.

They have put together "power rankings" of all the Democratic candidates based on impression they received from "activists, everyday caucus-goers, event attendees and pundits" based on the candidates' field organization, turnout likelihood, as well as their emotional intuitive impressions of the Democratic field. Despite widespread reports that Hillary is on top with Obama closing fast. The Iowa Independent finds Edwards best positioned to win.

They say if the Democratic caucuses held tonight the results would be:

1. John Edwards -- Edwards started about a year ago with the best organization in Iowa, and most of the foundation he built here is still in place. Although concerns persist that his sharpening rhetoric may be alienating a few of his earliest supporters, his solid performance at the Jefferson Jackson dinner, his endorsement from Caucus 4 Priorities (and the potential 10,000 caucus-goers it could bring him), and his ongoing commitment to retail politicking keep him in the top spot -- for now.

2. Barack Obama -- Obama's organization was fairly inconsistent over the summer, with some counties getting a lot of attention and others getting barely any. Still, his campaign's ability to build crowds -- as evidenced by his huge and geographically diverse group of supporters at the Jefferson Jackson dinner -- are as good a measure of his strength as anything. And as Clinton continues to receive sharper attacks from Edwards and subtler attacks from Obama himself, the Illinois Senator could move up in the coming weeks -- particularly on news of his United Auto Workers endorsement. As things stand now, he would still place second behind Edwards.

3. Hillary Clinton -- Different sources tell vastly different stories about the Clinton campaign in Iowa. Some expect it to flop completely, but others point to poll numbers showing Clinton in the top spot among Democratic candidates in Iowa. All that said, her aura of inevitability has been all but shattered by increased criticism over the past few weeks, and she seems to lack significant second choice support. And her latest swing through Iowa highlighted her energy policy, something which may not resonate among working class women, which continues to be her key demographic. Frankly, although the polls show Clinton in first place in Iowa, many of us have been hard pressed to find solid Clinton supporters whose names have not already appeared on a campaign press release.

4. Joe Biden -- Biden's campaign only picked up steam during the late Fall, but one could be led to believe that he planned it that way all along. His list of legislative endorsements (including many in the Democratic leadership) is his greatest strength, because it lends him credibility that others in the so-called second tier do not have. The current situation in Pakistan highlights his foreign policy expertise, which allows him to continue to take ground from Gov. Bill Richardson. And his support comes largely from older Iowans, who are more likely to attend Caucuses than any other group.

5. Bill Richardson -- Richardson's campaign may have peaked too early, when its tongue-in-cheek TV commercials bumped his poll numbers into the double digits during the early summer. Since then, he has shown little positive movement in polls. His campaign events are known to be wildly inconsistent: some speeches and events are excellent, and others are lackluster at best. But his field operation appears to be solid in certain key precincts, where staff have been on the ground since early summer.

6. Chris Dodd -- Everyone who has attended a Dodd event or met the Connecticut Senator personally seems to like him, but few seem to have committed to him so far. While his International Association of Fire Fighters endorsement continues to be a major X-factor, he has attracted very few Iowa endorsements from activists and politicos outside the IAFF. One gets the sense that Dodd has very strong second choice support from activists who have signed on to one of the top three candidates' campaigns, but he needs to persuade more of those caucus-goers to put him at the top of their lists. The campaign shows real potential with its talented staff and a candidate who is so committed to Iowa retail politics that he has moved his family here through January, but if the caucuses were held today, they would not go his way.

7. Dennis Kucinich -- Although Kucinich may have a small number of hold-outs from his 2004 campaign, the vast majority of his past supporters appear to have migrated elsewhere, because Kucinich has spent such little time and money on the ground here.

8. Mike Gravel

Personally, I predict that Obama will squeeze out a close victory in Iowa. I also feel that if Edwards were to win that he most likely doesn't have the money to stay competitive in the other early states, even if an Iowa victory were to give him a major boost. Next week the Iowa Independent will give a similar breakdown of the Republicans. I am curious to see where they place Huckabee, who I think is a dark horse there and really could change the whole game if he pulls ahead of Romney and wins. Stay tuned.

Digg!

Tagged as: clinton, obama, election08, biden, edwards, dodd, iowa, kucinich, richardson, iowa independent

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Broken Glass
This is no doubt one of the ugliest periods in American political history.
Post by DCap. October 11, 2008.
Bipartisan Concern About the Dangers of McPalin’s Hate-Mongering
"I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate ..."
Post by Emptywheel. October 10, 2008.
Stock Market Drops 107 Points During Bush's Speech on the Economy
That's the kind of confidence Bush inspires these days.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It all boils down to $?
Posted by: Jeanne on Nov 16, 2007 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if Edwards were to win, he still loses? This is, indeed, a farce of a pretense at representative government. Losers are still winners if they have enough money. Winners can't afford to be winners, so they will lose in the end? Wow, I guess it really is true that we have the best government that money can buy. The media don't report Edwards' competitive numbers in Iowa without prefacing it with the supposed lead that Clinton has "nationwide." It is another case of the leader not being one because the money-soaked runner-up will prevail in the end with the declaration that she is the leader ("nationwide"). It is why other candidates as worthy and potentially more popular are preemptively deemed losers and dismissed by our corporate-controlled press. People don't choose, in part, because people are never informed about other candidates. By the time we reach the voting booth, the network talking heads have analyzed, dissected, and nominated their probable winners -- not ours, theirs. Voters and viewers should operate on the assumption that the network news is spinning the candidates as much as they are spinning themselves. Any resemblance to actual persons is a coincidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It all boils down to $? Posted by: CatDad
» RE: It all boils down to $? Posted by: ninakat
Liam
Posted by: Liam on Nov 16, 2007 10:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate media and propaganda machine for corporate Amerika wants Hillary because they know (as was her husband) she is a global capitalist and will do nothing for the American people not approved by her business keepers.

They do not want Edwards...he has sued them and beat them and will work for the people. Hope he kicks butt in Iowa...but I'm afraid the Democrats have a death wish and will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory as they have done so many times before.

Liam

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thedirtydemocrat sez
Posted by: JimActivist on Nov 17, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards may surprise even the Fox Folks by winning the primary. I feel the caucus thingy sucks. Maybe I am too old to appreciate it.
John Edwards has the correct plan for education, total health care, the wars end, alternatives to oil/ethanol/coal energy and a serious way to achieve real peace and pay off our extreme deficit.
Watch and learn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The third horse often wins
Posted by: tclaverdure on Nov 18, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greetings,

Recently in Canada in our provincial election (Alberta) the third horse snuck right on by the two leaders. Federally the Liberal party is now lead by the third horse in their last race for the leadership, Stephan Dion a french canadian former minister under the Chretien and Martin years.

I personally see a very high probability, and have felt this way for the last year or more, that John Edwards is the third horse of the Democratic Party that will fly right on by Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. I hope he does.

His ticket should be Edward/Richardson for a sure win. Southern drawl with a spanish flavor.
This along with his obvious rapport with the unions would surely result in the White House going Democratic. As well the positive momentum would lock up the congress and the senate.

Then Bush and Cheney and the other group of thugs are charged and convicted of hundreds of charges and spend the rest of their wretched days on this earth in a Federal Prison.

Please do not beat me up for my thoughts. Just a hopefull Canuck wishing for the end to the Bush/Cheney nightmare.

Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The third horse often wins Posted by: kbrightwelll@earthlink.net
Mike5000
Posted by: Mike5000 on Nov 19, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Frankly, although the polls show Clinton in first place in Iowa, many of us have been hard pressed to find solid Clinton supporters whose names have not already appeared on a campaign press release."

Same here. Up and down the West Coast it's really hard to find a Hillary fan other than central committee suits. I don't know whether the pollsters have been bought or the telcos are redirecting their calls but I don't believe any telephone poll that shows Hillary with more than 10%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nominee
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 19, 2007 11:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Hillary becomes the Democratic nominee, I will (a) write in Kucinich, (b) vote green, or (c) not vote.
If any Republican wins, I will retire and move to Canada.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]