Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Retired JAGs On Waterboarding: "It Is Inhumane, It Is Torture, And It Is Illegal"

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 7:08 AM on November 4, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: Four retired Judge Advocates Generals, the judicial arm of the U.S. military, sharply criticize Mukasey's legal hedging
mukbush
Bush and Mukasey

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, originally appeared on Think Progress

Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey has repeatedly refused to state whether or not waterboarding is illegal. In a legal dodge, Mukasey called the torture technique "hypothetical" and said that he would need the "actual facts and circumstances" to strike a "legal opinion."

But in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), four retired Judge Advocates General (JAGs) -- the judicial arm of the U.S. military -- sharply criticize Judge Mukasey's legal hedging. They unequivocally state that waterboarding is torture. From their letter:

In the course of the Senate Judiciary Committee's consideration of President Bush's nominee for the post of Attorney General, there has been much discussion, but little clarity, about the legality of "waterboarding" under United States and international law. We write because this issue above all demands clarity: Waterboarding is inhumane, it is torture, and it is illegal. [...]

This is a critically important issue - but it is not, and never has been, a complex issue, and even to suggest otherwise does a terrible disservice to this nation. [...]

In this instance, the relevant rule - the law - has long been clear: Waterboarding detainees amounts to illegal torture in all circumstances. To suggest otherwise - or even to give credence to such a suggestion - represents both an affront to the law and to the core values of our nation.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a member of the JAG Corp. in the U.S. Air Force, also once condemned waterboarding as "illegal." "I don't think you have to have a lot of knowledge about the law to understand this technique violates" the Geneva Convention and other statutes, said Graham.

Yet Graham has now sold out his principles in return for campaign assistance from President Bush. The South Carolina senator, who recently announced his support for Mukasey, was rewarded with an appearance by the President at a "high-roller fundraiser" kicking off his '08 re-election campaign. Bush yesterday said that he has "no better ally than Lindsey Graham" in pushing forward his nominees through the Senate.

View the JAGs' full letter HERE.

Digg!

Tagged as: torture, bush administration, mukasey, waterboarding, jags

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Hey Netherlands: Fox "News" Hates You! (VIDEO)
Oh, it's not just the pot and the hookers ...
Post by PZ Myers. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
AG should be a counselor, not a Judge
Posted by: Ripcord on Nov 4, 2007 6:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mukasey's response to the Congressional question about the legality of waterboarding is judicious,
but it is hardly wise.

Mukasey has answered this as any good judge should;
Judges don't answer hypothetical questions,
Judges only rule on the legality of an act in the context of an actual case, one based on the specific facts of the case.

Mukasey, however, is being interviewed as the President's nominee for Attorney General, his main legal counselor.

A better question would be:
What would you advise the President about waterboarding?

I personally served with David Brahms and greatly respect his legal abilities.
Make no mistake, Brahms as well as all Judge Advocates are champions of the Government.
So it takes a lot of thought and courage to render an opinion which is contrary to the Administration's policy.

This confirms how misled and misleading Gonzales and Bush are.

I can not believe that any of our elected leaders would support the Adminstration on this question.

Bob Hughes
Lt Col USMC (Ret.) (Judge Advocate)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction? Posted by: KeepsonTickn
Geneva Convention
Posted by: pammers on Nov 5, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last time I read it, it applied to enemies wearing uniforms from a declared country. It doesn't apply to Islamo-Fascists.
And besides, there is a difference between torture and enhanced interrogtion techniques. Now to namby-pamby, limp-writed liberals, anything stronger than a slap on the wrist is torture.
The USA even uses loud music for sleep deprivation. Now if they use Barry Manilow music, THAT WOULD BE TORTURE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Geneva Convention Posted by: LouisFallert
» RE: Geneva Convention Posted by: walldodger1969
» living in a different world Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: Geneva Convention Posted by: particle
» RE: Geneva Convention Posted by: wisegalah
Closet Zionists
Posted by: Nick on Nov 5, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
strike again

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proofreaders, please
Posted by: don4004 on Nov 5, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The plural of Judge Advocate General is Judges Advocate General if I'm not mistaken, not Judge Advocates Generals. Where is your editor, your proofreader?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» psst! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Welcome! Posted by: KeepsonTickn
Isn't Lindsey Gay?
Posted by: tommy1957 on Nov 5, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been hearing a lot that Senator Linsey Graham is gay. If he is in fact gay and has engaged in homosexual activities, then why is he still a reserve AF Officer? This is a violation of the "Don't Ask - Don't Tell" policy. Can anyone explain this to me? I guess that the AF only applies this rule to non-pro-military political liars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Isn't Lindsey Gay? Posted by: KeepsonTickn