Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Slain Soldier's Family Wins $11 Million Dollar Suit Against Homophobic Phelps Family Church

Posted by TRex at 6:45 AM on November 1, 2007.


TRex: It's enough to bankrupt them and totally destroy them. That's the best news I've heard in ages.
911phelps
A Phelps family follower

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Suzanne Braun Levine SuzanneBraunLevine.com

Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
Amanda Think Progress

Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

This post, written by TRex, originally appeared on FireDogLake

Well, well, well.

A Pennsylvania jury has awarded the family of slain Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder some eleven million dollars in a court case against the "ministry" of Fred Phelps. To wit!

After members of Reverend Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church demonstrated at the funeral of Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder his father was justifiably upset. But Albert Snyder didn't just get mad - he got even:

A grieving father won a nearly $11 million verdict Wednesday against a fundamentalist Kansas church that pickets military funerals in the belief that the war in Iraq is a punishment for the nation's tolerance of homosexuality.

Albert Snyder of York, Pennsylvania., sued the Westboro Baptist Church for unspecified damages after members demonstrated at the March 2006 funeral of his son, Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder, who was killed in Iraq.

The jury first awarded $2.9 million in compensatory damages. It returned later in the afternoon with its decision to award $6 million in punitive damages for invasion of privacy and $2 million for causing emotional distress.

U.S. District Judge Richard Bennett noted the size of the award for compensating damages "far exceeds the net worth of the defendants," according to financial statements filed with the court.

Well, jump up and slap the mule. That's the best news I've heard in ages. That means that Westboro Baptist will probably go bankrupt and Reverend Phelps and his congregation (which is mostly made up of his extended family) are going to have to ship their little inbred, home-schooled brats off to real schools because they're all going to have to get real jobs, rather than travel the country intruding on the private grief of American families.

Outside court today, Rev Phelps and his children waved placards with slogans such as "Pray for more dead kids" and "God hates fag enablers", while passing drivers and pedestrians shouted abuse at them.

Defense lawyer Jonathan Katz urged jurors not to award punitive damages because the $US2.9 million ($A3.11 million) in compensatory damages was already three times the defendants' net worth.

"It's enough already to bankrupt them and financially destroy them," Mr Katz said.

We live in hope, Sparky.

"Pray for more dead kids"?! What kind of heartless monsters are the Phelps family?

Oh! Heh, that's right. They're some BROKE motherfuckin' monsters.

Suck on THAT, Pastor.

Oh, and happy holidays.

Digg!

Tagged as: homophobia, relgious right, phelps, us troops

TRex is a regular blogger for FireDogLake.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thanks for making the day a little brighter
Posted by: Tombo on Nov 1, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is always good to wake up to some good news.

What type of person protests a funeral anyway? We should seriously consider legislation to make such action illegal and this verdict paves the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

free speech
Posted by: patman47 on Nov 1, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't make demonstrations at funerals illegal or we'll never catch these slimeballs. we must make it easy for the idiots to come out from the rocks so we can deal with them in the light and expose them to the public, and their own neighbors and families.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Down with hate!
Posted by: magiquarian1969 on Nov 1, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So good to restore my faith in people by knowing that the kind of pure hatred they try to spread has failed. Maybe now they'll have to self reflect and see the hatred in their hearts. They obviously have a lot of pain they can't deal with, so they turn on others. There own hatred will be their downfall. I never understand why people willingly invoke and spread sorrow instead of focusing on the love and light that their saviour preached about. It warms my heart to know that evil has failed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Luke 4
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Nov 1, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WTFWJD?

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down.

christians? hardly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now, if we could only ban rap music, heavy metal, pornography,
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 1, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
abortion protestors, muslim garb, political protests, civil right marches, talk radio, certain books, and those pesky illegal alien marches the country would be soooo much better and more civil. We need to ban all speech and protests that are offensive. The whole "free speech" and "right of assembly" is really getting out of hand. We should just have a referendum and the majority rules on what types of speech, assembly, and protest are legal. That would solve this problem!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you sound like my grandfather Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» -5 for spelling Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» No one made it illegal Posted by: LeeAnnG
» well made point Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
THESE PEOPLE ARE BENEATH CONTEMPT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 1, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read about the $11MM award and couldn't be happier. I don't know who bankrolls this group but I would inagine they're broke. Let's hope so. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd like to see the court's ruling
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 1, 2007 9:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to know exactly why the action was considered to be illegal or in violation. I imagine the argument might be that it interrupted a private religious service. Certainly, the rights to free speech do not overrule the right to privacy. But I'd still like to see the ruling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]