Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Naomi Wolf's Guide to Restoring Liberty in America

Posted by Naomi Wolf at 5:08 AM on October 26, 2007.


It is open season on all of us. It is time to take to the streets.
300pxlondonantiwarprotestbanners
protest

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Naomi Wolf, originally appeared on FireDogLake

All right: Blackwater and other contractors have four BILLION dollars in US funds and, the New York Times reports today, almost no oversight in Iraq; wildfires are consuming acres of Southern California and many counties have been declared to be in a state of emergency -- and nothing at all but a whisper of popular opposition and a prayer -- nothing legal -- would prevent Bush today from declaring that the National Guard is overstretched and that it is Blackwater's torturers and murderers, recruited from Salvadoran, Ecuadoran and Nigerian paramilitaries, who will be `maintaining order' in the `public emergency' that is Southern California; and Mukasey has informed Congress that he has no idea what waterboarding is -- which professed cluelessness alone should disqualify him from service -- and that the President does not actually need to obey the law of the United States of America -- which alone should alert us that if he is confirmed the game is over. Once Congress confirms someone to decide the law of the land who holds that the President is exempt from the law of the land (which assertion was, notably, an historic tipping point when Hitler asked his Reichstag to confirm a similar position about his powers in regard to the law and the constitution) it is open season on all of us.

It is time to take to the streets.

Many of you have asked about a national strike. This is the next step in a democracy movement. We need to hold monthly strikes -- a word that is too scary for some, and we want to be inclusive, so rather we will urge people of all walks of life to participate in mass-action Constitution Days.

What will we do -- in our millions, hopefully, we will Sit Down for the Constitution in the most public space in our communities. The seated mass citizen action is more effective now than a march; less cause for confrontation, more family-friendly, you can gather more people for a longer time and it can be more of a community affirmation of American values and the Rule of Law. Daniel Ellsberg, whom I had the honor of meeting last week in Berkeley, along with his brave and beautiful wife Patricia, reminded me that it took only three days of a widely observed National Moratorium to strike a real blow to the war in the Vietnam.

We propose that local citizens organize these Constitution Days once a month, on the 6th, starting Nov. 6 (before or after you vote). We suggest that those who can refrain from going to work or to school -- use the time to be with your fellow citizens at the event or reading about democracy and sharing those ideals with your friends and neighbors. Those who can't leave work, come for lunch hour. If millions join the nation will react, and even if the first few are small, we must begin. You guys have to organize these locally -- we can't. But that is powerful. Here is how to proceed:

The Liberty Kit for Constitution Days: Assemble a Powerful `Sit Down For the Constitution' Citizen Action November 6 and Monthly Thereafter

1. Locally, a volunteer should set up a website announcing the time (start at noon, stay till five; you will have most visitors between twelve and two). The place should be the steps of the Town Hall or the most obvious civic space (in Chicago for instance everyone said Fenwick Park). Send a press kit to all local media outlets -- you can get the resources in the library or online. If you don't get coverage you can write to local advertisers of your local news and newspapers -- cc the ad department of the media outlets -- that you will stop buying their products and will urge others to do so as well unless they encourage local media to cover this local important news. Barbara Martinez who started at sitdownfortheconstitution.org provides a central space -- send an email to the site after you event so we can get an accurate nationwide count of participants.

2. Ask all to wear red, white or blue t shirts or sweaters and dark slacks. A strong visual is more likely to get wide press coverage and a good color photo on the cover of a news section of local news. It is an even better visual if you arrange people into red, white and blue sections. That will inspire wide angle shots from a higher position. Protests from progressives always seem visually disorderly -- making coverage less likely -- and a visually orderly, peaceful set of groups also makes it harder for police to crack down violently on protesters after accusing them of misconduct.

3. Have people bring uniformly sized US flags -- tell them a good local or internet source -- or buy a lot and sell them there. It reinforces that this is pure support for the American system, not partisanship. (And it is a bad media image to taser people supporting the flag.) We want to send a clear message that this is above all a patriotic, transpartisan action on behalf of our fournders' vision. People should not wave the small ones, but rather good-sized ones that will blow in the breeze (again, visuals and media attention) -- 2Å~3 at least. Signs should be in red, white and blue and uniform: `Moms for the Constitution', `Vets for the Bill of Rights' `Teachers for Liberty'; `Americans Don't Torture' `The Constitution Keeps us Safe' `Stand Up for the Founders'. Important are: `Independents for the Constitution' `Swing Voters for the Constitution' and `Republicans for the Constitution' and `No President is Above the Law'. Signs should NOT address unrelated issues -- veganism, Palestine or Israel, patriarchy -- the left tends to let a chaos of messages dilute the force and inclusiveness of one strong message. The civil rights marches were always disciplined in focusing only on civil rights, for instance.

4. Encourage soldiers and vets to sit down for the Constitution in uniform. Give them the names of good local pro bono lawyers to call if they face reprisals. Publicize the reprisals.

5. Distribute copies of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Let people download them from the website.

6. Have people bring guitars, musical instruments and sing. Let ordinary citizens lead the singing from a microphone. For some mysterious reason, protests swell and move people when there is singing, but depress and dispirit people when there are only speeches or angry chanting. The civil rights movement sang. The contemporary left speechifies. So sing. Create a Constitution Songbook you distribute -- with patriotic songs' words and folk songs (this land is your land) that are widely loved -- often protests have some v left band that alienates others not so left -- people want to feel included across the political spectrum. Have the words of the Star Spangled Banner, My Country 'Tis of Thee etc -- as well as inspirational songs that are inclusive -- in the songbook. It is hard to engage in mass arrests against people singing the national anthem.

7. Have people also bring sleeping bags and folding chairs, food and drink and children. Encourage people to bring food to share informally -- it is a community pot luck in honor of Liberty. You can set up folding tables where people bring their food to share across race, class and party lines. People feel disconnected and powerless after random protest meetups. You want to foster community and let people find each other as local patriots and build bonds that make other kinds of action possible.

8. Invite local clergy of all faiths to sit down for the Constitution in their religious garb. Ask local clergy of many faiths to bless the gathering in their many voices from their many different faith traditions, thus reminding us that this is a pluralistic society (and making it hard to dismiss protests as hostile to mainstream values).

9. There can be periods of quiet or people simply playing their own music as an offering to the community during the Sit Down for the Constitution. Have children give five minute talks or read essays of `What America Means to Me.' Have ONE lawyer who speaks ENGLISH explain every hour on the hour just what the Bill of Rights means to ordinary people. Endless speechifying exhausts people. You are there to be witnesses and to encounter one another as citizens. Have ONE table where local literature about activism is displayed and have people wear name tags that identify them by name and also by resource or skill or organization that they can contribute to saving democracy. Let them find one another. Give priority to vets or military men and women to speak very personally about what liberty and the Bill of Rights means to them -- the values they wish to uphold.

10. At the end of the vigil, create a massive circle and light a million candles and ask everyone to take the AFC pledge to protect the Constitution. Say it together: it is powerful to hear the sound of a multiplied voice. Go home in a broad stream holding your candles -- another great visual for the cameras. Meet again in a month. If you want to connect before that in a Citizens' Home Gathering -- which many people have asked for -- let someone host it in his or her home or in a public space in a restaurant or friendly bookstore/cafe. Take citizen action out of an impersonal space -- make citizenship human, face-to-face, easy, supportive and effective. You are Americans.

Digg!

Tagged as: anti-war, civil liberties, naomi wolf, the constitution

Naomi Wolf is the author of The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot.


House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
House Will Take Up-or-Down Vote on Stupak Amendment, Threatening Women's Rights
The House leadership bows to anti-choice congressmen, allowing them a vote on an anti-choice amendment to the health-care bill.
Post by RH Reality Check. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Sheep in Wolf's Earth-Toned Clothing
Posted by: goldmarx on Oct 26, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we supposed to take, of all people, Naomi Wolf seriously?

Where was her concern for liberties when she sided with Andrea Dworkin and Catharine Mackinnon in "The Beauty Myth" and implicitly derogated sex-positive feminsts like Candida Royalle?

She still hasn't apologized for that.

Until then, pfffffffffffffffffft...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I have an idea... Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» What does this... Posted by: Bbear41
thekidde
Posted by: thekidde on Oct 26, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm, Candida Royalle is a "sex positive" feminist? I thought (after googling her) that she was a porn "actress", director, producer - in other words an exloiter of women.

Anyway, I'm with Naomi. Been saying for some time that the pitchfork and torches requirement in American political discourse is getting closer and closer to necessity and reality. Also, eating the rich seems to be a more and more appetizing (sorry) choice. Screw the chicken congress, the people can take back their country if the sorry-ass senators and reps are too chicken to fight the neo-cons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thekidde Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» and Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: thekidde Posted by: goldmarx
What are you talking about?
Posted by: Maya on Oct 26, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Beauty Myth is an astounding, honest book...probably far too much truth any of us can handle still as we rush to get sliced open for breast implants and chemically enhanced lips.

What does Wolf need to apologize for? She's fearless.

And when will the pro sex work cheerleaders ever realize that Dworkin and MacKinnon's arguments were not against sex. Maybe the problem is with your understanding of sex...sex is not being paid to have ANYTHING done to you because there are no other options...sex is NOT being analy raped and having someone ejaculate in your face as depicted in pornography. How can we as women allow that to be culturally accepted parameters of sex and women's bodies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: meetmeineleusis
Blackwater
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Oct 26, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone read the NYT description of the Blackwater HQ?
Thing is like a modern castle.
Almost like they're expecting some shit to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blackwater Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Blackwater Posted by: VZEQICVA
Its fascism, not "loss of liberty"
Posted by: citizenjoe on Oct 26, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet is pretty much chicken-shit. Naomi has said that we are facing a fascist over-throw of the Constitution, not merely the loss of a bit of liberty. She is clearly calling Blackwater the new SS and the "Patriot" Act a new Enabling Act, like the one that handed Hitler his dictatorship. Lets not mince words here. Its too late for such tricks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its fascism, not "loss of liberty" Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Its fascism, not "loss of liberty" Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Its fascism, not "loss of liberty" Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Its fascism, not "loss of liberty" Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» Where will you go? Posted by: citizenjoe
» Blind, as usual Posted by: citizenjoe
» Brunowe- concede defeat? Posted by: citizenjoe
Exactly what makes the Left impotent
Posted by: cdunaway on Oct 26, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that the need for absolute purity on every single issue is exactly why the Left is not effective. As Naomi implies, if we get out there promoting all our private agendas, we can easily be portrayed as a gang of nut job ex-hippies who should be ignored. That may not be fair, but it is certainly accurate.

If we don't restore Constitutional government in this country and restore the Bill of Rights, we can forget about justice for anyone: gays, immigrants, sex workers, you name it. Check out the Ralph Nader video clip at Floating Down Denial if you don't take this seriously.

There is absolutely no cause more important than the Constitution. If we had Constitutional government, Bush would not be in office and there would never have been an invasion of Iraq. We are now in the situation where one political party openly and flagrantly ignores the Constitution, and the other is afraid to do anything about it. As Natasha says:

"In other words, follow closely here, upholding the Constitution is a partisan left position in American politics now. Utterly disregarding it is the partisan right position. Deciding that utter disregard for it needs to be smoothed over by special legal dispensation, so we don't have to settle the question distastefully in court, is centrist."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It will ultimately come down to military loyalties
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 26, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultimately, as with all coups, the end result hinges on whom the military aligns with.

Historically, destructive meglomaniacs like Hitler, Robespierre, etc. have enjoyed a short life once the military turned against them, personal guard notwithstanding.

Blackwater's undisciplined thug brigade will not last five minutes against an organized Army or Marine assault.

And Bushco's mishandling of the Iraq war, combined with the ravages wrought by privatization, would probably put the military safely in Congress' camp, if a coup attempt happens.

Army and Marine officer corps are probably schooled-enough in constitutional process to pose a low threat to the public. Bush's religious nuts tend to be a minority in the services, and units, that see actual combat operations.

Navy officers tend to be more opportunistic career ladder social climbers, because they do less, operationally -- but would thus be less likely to be on the ground facing protestors.

Troops are troops, and Bill O'Reilly's 'secular-progressive' baiting, notwithstanding, it would probably take more than disgust at "San Francisco values" to make them turn weapons against the U.S. populace.

Add to that the uncentralized nature of American policing systems (despite Homeland Security's recent efforts) and you still come out with a vast, decentralized population to control.

Regardless of who started the California fires, a successful Buscho coup's probably going to have to go the bread and circuses route, rather than the Enabling Act route, and the U.S. economy appears to be heading in the opposite direction at this point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scary, huh? Posted by: oregoncharles
Darn I was hoping for something more
Posted by: mom'z the word on Oct 26, 2007 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, Daniel Ellsberg was a different time and place. His protest then was unique and original. It worked because it catch everyone by surprise. And we didn't have the Patriots Act then. Things have changed a lot and I am sorry to say I think it is going to take something a little different to have any sort of an impact on this situation.

First, people protesting are no real threat to anyone. As protestors we are ASKING the powers that be to change the way they are doing things. This type of protest is really coming from a powerless position and is of no consequence. We are asking the oppressors and tyrants to relinquish their power over us and to start behaving like human beings. This is just silly.

Do we expect them to act in good faith, good conscience, good sense in response to our protest? They haven't acted in good conscience from the beginning why would a protest be any different? First, Why are we ASKING people that are slowly and painfully dismembering us from our Constitution and our person to please stop. Why are we ASKING them to stop? The power is in the ability to tell them to stop.

By asking them to stop the torture and killing we are admitting to them that they still have the power. They have the power to refuse to meet our demands and this gives them more power. And of course they will refuse to meet our demands because they have no intention of doing the right thing, nor do they care that what they are doing to us as a country is wrong, illegal or immoral. Why should they? Who is going to stop them? Some protestors? I don't think so.

If you want to get these people to stop treating us like malcontents you have to talk their language. If you want to get even then get smart and get them where it counts. In their bank accounts. Money talks and sh-- walks. So instead of sitting down, stand up and boycott something that is near and dear to their hearts and will effect their bottom line. Don't buy something one day a month or two days a month or refuse to buy something until things change. This is how you get their attention. Affect the bottom line and you have them in the palm of your hand begging you to stop boycotting their power source.

I am sure their are some very knowledgeable and informed people out their that could tell you exactly what products, goods, or services that when boycotted for even a minute would send those that would benefit from our demise as a democracy into a tail spin. Where is Bush's money coming from? Or one of your representatives, or senators financial investments? If we threaten to boycott the companies that our corrupt politicians have invested in imagine how fast those companies are going to want to get rid of that politician? That politician is now a big fat liability. We boycott the goods until the president, vice president, cabinet member, chief of staff, or whoever, starts listening to us for real and in a timely manner.

And what is great about a boycott is you can do it from the comfort of your own home, anytime, anywhere and no one has to know you are doing it. You are not a target and the power to do it is all yours. They can’t throw you in jail or hose you down or read you the riot act by sitting at home refusing to buy some products. When the stocks start to drop you know you are winning.

I am looking forward to some really good boycotting ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THE BUCK STOPS HERE. Posted by: LouisLouis
10 steps toward fascism (It's happening)
Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian on Oct 29, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me if somebody already offered this information, but Ms. Wolf has laid-out the scenario in her recent book titled, The End of America - Letter Warning To A Young Patriot. To view a recent lecture she conducted concerning this, go to www.brasschecktv.com/page/177.html . It's fairly long, so pour a glass of your favorite beverage and partake. We're at a critical tipping-point -- hence Ms. Wolf's suggestions for citizenry action. Without some form of resistance, we're decidedly doomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

democracy movement and voting boycott
Posted by: rgroomer on Nov 1, 2007 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that we should do all we can to rescue our democracy. That includes developing an understanding of what has gone wrong as well as developing a strategy for change. The heart of the problem is that our 2-party system has been corrupted by money. So, while we meet to discuss the Constitution, we should urge people: Don't Vote in Rigged Elections! If enough voters withdraw their support, the government will lose legitimacy. Then we can demand direct democracy through an amendment V Convention. Read your Constitution! It's there--we can take back the government!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]