Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Conservative Blog Bans Ron Paul Supporters

Posted by Steven Reynolds at 6:09 AM on October 24, 2007.


Steven Reynolds: Ron Paul supporters are not Republicans according to RedState.com. Isn't speech supposed to be for all people?

This post, written by Steven Reynolds, originally appeared on The All Spin Zone

Ron Paul supporters are not Republicans according to RedState.com, so they're going to limit what Ron Paul supporters can say on the web site. Isn't speech supposed to be for all people, RedState?

Not only are Ron Paul supporters "a bunch of liberals pretending to be Republicans," but they are now restricted in their use of the RedState.com website. In a stunning move against supporters of a Republican candidate for President of the United States, the powers that be at RedState.com, a magnet site on the conservative end of the political spectrum, has decided to censor those from the party RedState supports. I got this stunning news from Politico, but let's look at Leon H. Wolf's words. He's from RedState. (Since comments are closed on this post over at RedState, I invite Ron Paul supporters to comment here by posting nearly all of Wolf's rant:

Effective immediately, new users may *not* shill for Ron Paul in any way shape, form or fashion. Not in comments, not in diaries, nada. If your account is less than 6 months old, you can talk about something else, you can participate in the other threads and be your zany libertarian self all you want, but you cannot pimp Ron Paul. Those with accounts more than six months old may proceed as normal.

Now, I could offer a long-winded explanation for *why* this new policy is being instituted, but I'm guessing that most of you can probably guess. Unless you lack the self-awareness to understand just how annoying, time-consuming, and bandwidth-wasting responding to the same idiotic arguments from a bunch of liberals pretending to be Republicans can be. Which, judging by your comment history, you really don't understand, so allow me to offer an alternate explanation: we are a bunch of fascists and we're upset that you've discovered where we keep the black helicopters, so we're silencing you in an attempt to keep you from warning the rest of your brethren so we can round you all up and send you to re-education camps all at once.

Hey, we're sure *some* of Ron Paul's supporters really are Republicans. They can post at any one of a zillion Ron Paul online forums. Those who have *earned* our respect by contributing usefully for a substantial period of time will be listened to with appropriate respect. Those who have not will have to *earn* that respect by contributing usefully in the other threads... and not mentioning Ron Paul. Given a month of solid contributing, send one of us an email and we'll consider lifting the restriction on your account.

You may now resume your regularly scheduled RedState activities. Everyone but the Ron Paul spammers, that is. You can resume your regularly scheduled activities somewhere else.

Man, there's trouble in RedStateland. Imagine! They've got a candidate doing far better than anyone thought he could. Ron Paul. They've got other candidates who are about as middling as middling gets. the whole collection of McCain, Thompson, Romney and Giuliani have maybe half the excitement and firepower that Ron Paul does. Certainly Ron Paul has the supporters who are willing to work for him. So what do these Republicans at RedState do? They ban the speech of the Ron Paul supporters.

Even Republicans care about free speech when it is their own. What RedState has done here is offend some highly vocal Republicans. It won't harm RedState one bit when they hear the whining and complaining from the Ron Paul supporters. But it will hurt the eventual Republican candidate in Fall '08, because some of those Ron Paul supporters will not be voting for the eventual Republican candidate, and none of those Ron Paul supporters will work for the eventual Republican candidate. RedState is pissing off the Libertarian wing of the Republican Party, the only wing of the Republican Party that acts like Republicans used to act, with care for balanced budgets, real moral values and sensible foreign policy ruled by facts, not Dick Cheney's fantasies. (Sorry to put that tiny image of Dick Cheney's fantasies in your brains -- just down a shot or two and maybe you won't remember the horror.) Yes, RedState's move will hurt Republicans.

Digg!

Tagged as: conservatives, redstate.com, election08, paul

Steven Reynolds is a regular blogger for the All Spin Zone


Hagee's Revenge? Videos Of Controversial Pastor Removed From YouTube
As Christians United for Israel summit approaches, copyright and PR trump evangelism.
Post by Sam Stein. July 8, 2008.
White House Briefing Materials Describe Italian PM as "Amateur", "Hated by Many"
WH apologizes to PM Berlusconi, a close ally of Bush and backer of Iraq war.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 8, 2008.
Rep. Waxman Threatens to Hold Contempt Vote on AG Mukasey
Mukasey must produce FBI interview with Cheney, or face the consequences.
Post by Satyam Khanna. July 8, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
yeah...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 24, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. if only they were REAL conservatives like Romney and Giuliani. You know.. real republicans who've barely had "conservative" beliefs on so many issues for six months themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul is not a libertarian.
Posted by: constitution, what constitution on Oct 24, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are the hardcore right wingers clinging to a war that hard? Mr. Paul received a 76% approval rating from the Christian Coalition [based on his abortion philosophy as well as his prayer in school (he has voted pro-prayer in schools, but has voted against it since then. is this a change of heart or a political move?) and voucher beliefs]. Silly Republicans, that's exactly what you want. The support of Mr Paul and Bob Barr are exactly what made me leave the libertarian party. Freedom? Equality? Only if you're Christian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul symbolizes what they've lost
Posted by: lamar on Oct 24, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul is the only real conservative in the GOP field. All the rest are in favor of big government, never-ending foreign wars, destroying privacy under the guise of those wars, regulation of speech, mandating Christianity and blowing up the budget. Redstaters are so drunk on war and cool looking guns that they've completely forgotten what made conservatism appealing in the first place. They call Ron Paul liberal because they don't know exactly what he is. The word, of course, is "principled."

I'm glad Ron Paul is there to remind them of where they came from. I wish Ron Paul didn't have some of his views about the gold standard or immigration. Still, his views taken as a whole are the best the GOP has to offer right now. I like what the man stands for, but calling him a liberal is like calling my Aunt Sally a lawnmower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing New....
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 24, 2007 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mainstream conservative blogs do not tolerate dissenting points of view. Try this experiment: Create a new account on the conservative FreeRepublic.com site....post a polite, thoughtful liberal post...get a stopwatch and see how quickly your post and account gets deleted.....It's usually within ten minutes...Their censorship efforts would be the envy of any 3rd-World dictatorship....Other conservative sites like BillOReilly.com get around explicit censorship by charging a monthly fee...which does the job of keeping out progressive posters. Tom DeLay has openly admitted that his new website will have state-of-the-art censorship to block liberal points of view.

....And I'm proud to be an American...where at least I know I'm free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The hate over at redstate is really ramping up
Posted by: Techubus on Oct 24, 2007 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://redstate.com/stories/miscellanea/ron_paul_fan_mail

This makes me appreciate sites like alternet a lot more. As long as people aren't posting blatant racist hate speech, dissenting comments are left to stand.

They are cheering the idea of banning an entire group of people for supporting a candidate they don't like. I know a lot of people here dislike Clinton supporters, but you don't see us calling for a site wide blackout of their viewpoint.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at the economic theories
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 24, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of the Republicans. Free markets? Hah! They believe in crony capitalism and market manipulation. Paul is at least consistant in his libertarian economic views.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And then there were none......
Posted by: zenbruder on Oct 24, 2007 11:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bit by bit the GOP is alienating it's own. The more they make Ron Paul an outcast the more attention people are going to pay to him. Why do they fear him? Because he speaks the truth and he doesn't talk in sound bites. Every time I've seen him speak no matter the topic he is eloquent and well read on it.

I am registering Republican just to vote for him in the primaries. The leading Republicans are scary at best. The Democratic field is fairly unimpressive - I feel Barack sold out early (AIPAC).

Check this out. Be part of the Revolution

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberal vs Libertarian
Posted by: Urgelt on Oct 25, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, there's a hack job for you.

Ron Paul is definitely not a liberal. I've read his platform.

The Republican party used to be home to a big crowd of libertarians: people like Goldwater. People who hated foreign adventures. People who hated Big Government and the national debt. People who didn't like Big Government telling them how to conduct their personal lives. People who hated free-floating currency unbacked by anything valuable, social programs, and domestic spying. People who thought Jews were taking over the world. The John Birch Society has been lurking around in Republican drag for many decades.

I've always wondered how the Republican Party manages to seem so monolithic and united in its message, when it actually contains so many divergent constituencies. I need wonder no more. It manages it by brutal censorship, and it bullies its constinuencies with fear mongering about the dreaded Liberals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wolves in wolves clothing
Posted by: osd on Oct 27, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well since Republicans aren't really republicans, they are part of the " new world order." They want to keep warring, run the country into the ground, so they can take over and make it there dictatorship. Money, control and power thats what they want and are working so hard for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]