Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Regent University Student Forced Into "Psychiatric Evaluation" for Posting Pic of Pat Robertson on Facebook

Posted by Amanda Terkel at 5:05 AM on October 18, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: Student says, "Pat Robertson is crazier than I am."

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, originally appeared on Think Progress

Adam Key, a Regent University law student, has been "indefinitely suspended pending a psychiatric evaluation" for posting on his Facebook page an "unflattering photo" of university founder Pat Robertson:

Click for larger version
(click for larger version)

As McClatchy notes, the picture is "from a YouTube video in which Robertson scratches his face with the middle finger of his right hand. The video is edited to freeze the frame in that position for several seconds."

A dean justified the suspension by alleging that Key "brought a gun on campus." But Key insists he has "never owned or carried a gun." In an interview with Above the Law, Key elaborates on why this "pychiatric evaluation" is ridiculous:

Keep in mind, this is the same school that published law review articles relying on sources like Paul Cameron, the man kicked out of the American Psychological Association for deliberately falsifying data in order to further his cause. I would gladly consider an evaluation by a legitimate psychiatrist that is entirely unaffiliated with Regent.

However, as I have repeatedly emphasized, I will undergo this psychiatric exam after Regent forces Pat Robertson to undergo one. Truly, what's crazier... disagreeing with the administration, or hearing voices that tell you about hurricanes that don't happen, and the impending apocalypse?

A look at some of Robertson's past comments:

"I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he [Hugo Chavez] thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." [Link]

Robertson suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's recent stroke was the result of Sharon's policy, which he claimed is "dividing God's land." [Link]

"You know some of them [college professors] are killers!" [Link]

"I believe it's [Islam] motivated by demonic power. It is satanic and it's time we recognize what we're dealing with. ... [T]he goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination." [Link]

Regent is rated the #1 most conservative school in the nation. Approximately 150 of its graduates are serving in the Bush administration. Key said that he went to Regent to "to show people that liberalism isn't a sin."

Digg!

Tagged as: regent university, facebook, pat robertson, religious right, religious conservatives, education, civil liberties

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Latino Migrant Beaten to Death in Penn
A predictable outcome of the overheated immigration debate in this country.
Post by yave begnet. July 24, 2008.
House Hearing on 2004's Lessons Sheds No New Light on Flawed Election
Old arguments and explanations abound about the last presidential election.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. July 24, 2008.
McCain: Time to Start Rationing Veterans' Healthcare
'McCain received a grade of D from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and a 20 percent vote rating from the Disabled Veterans of America.'
Post by Steve Benen. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I'm still trying to figure out
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Oct 18, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why what someone posted on his FaceBook page is any of the school's business.
And posting inflattering pics of the likes of Robertson is certainly not evidence of insanity.
I'd be interested to know who exactly saw the gun this kid is accused of having brought to school. And if he did bring a gun to school, why were the police not called instead of a psychiatrist? Something smells fishy, and there's no tuna in my lunch.
On the other hand, some of the things that have come out of Robertson's mouth make me wonder about the firmness of his grip on reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crazier...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Oct 18, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Key is not crazy but maybe naive for believing the religious right would accept free thinking, much less unflattering graphic humour. I'd like to see if what he did is specifically forbidden in that school.

But who is crazier?

Pat Robertson sure seems crazy enough, but I would go with whoever decided a cradle of fanatic bigotry like that can teach Law.

Sure, a private institution can legally limit free speech, but... it should? If you eliminate discussion from the learning process, it becomes flawed, you dont get lawyers but drones with good memory and a script. How can a professional from such institutions be expected to uphold western democracy ideals and fundamental rights when reaching a goverment position, if those concepts are absent of his education?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forboding. Communist dictatorships also used "psychiatric" reasons to imprison,
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 18, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
drug, question, and discredit people. The USA for years has done this but now with the culture of fear and a police state government one can imagine the excuse of "psychiatric problems" we be used more and more frequently to cut down on dissent or non-conformity. Already the US gov't is planning to now allow any ex-military with any (even long ago in the past or during war time) "psychiatric problems" from owning a gun. Some states have also passed such laws. Children are routinely taken away from people with "psychiatric problems". Courts have allowed people to be drugged without consent for "psychiatric problems" and I think even allow them to be executed because "with the drugs they are now sane". School children, usually boys, are given methamphetimines like candy due to diagnosis of ADD, etc. Thusly being labelled as "psychiatric problems" for the rest of their life, besides becoming addicts. Companies read medical histories to "weed out" those with "psychiatric problems". And so on.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good for him...
Posted by: goeswithness on Oct 18, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's got a lot of strength and independence for being so young, but I'm curious what led him to go to that school...wonder what his story is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Regent should be careful what it wishes for...
Posted by: Xynyx on Oct 18, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe someone will "bring" a gun or some guns to that campus...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat Robertson is a FRAUD!
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 18, 2007 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robertson was almost disowned by his Dixiecrat father for his wild antics as a young man. People like to think he became an evangelist because he recognized "the error of his ways" as a young man, but that is BS. He became an evangelist because he knew he could make GOBS of MONEY!

Evidently this young man he seen "the error of his way" also: He has recognized that all this "born again" bunk is just a recruiting tool for the naive and stupid hatched by Repug party hacks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RightWingNut evangelicals
Posted by: frank69 on Oct 18, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the rightwingnut evangelicals invoke God for one and only one reason: MONEY! They invoke the name of Jesus, but obviouly must have forgotten about "Jesus throwing the money changers out of the temple." The RightWingNuts also forgot that He said "put aside your worldly goods and come follow me." Sounds to me like Jesus wasn't really too interested in MONEY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Regent is just ONE of the many right wing universities that restrict students' rights
Posted by: annieb on Oct 18, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many kids have no idea how restricted their rights become when they attend a religious college or university. The ordinary college student has very few of the 1st amendment rights that the rest of us enjoy. Public college/university students have the best protection, but religious schools are able to restrict rights and persecute students because of their status as religious insitutions. For instance, Pepperdine University says it does not "illegally discriminate;" however it is able to legally discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation, even on their sexual activity (pre- or extra-marital sex) because they are a religious institution.

WAKE UP, AMERICA - this situation is really grim. How many school guidance counselors are warning students to take a look at schools' behavior compacts and "public safety" sites before they apply or enrool???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANYONE WHO STILL NEEDS PROOF ........................
Posted by: yogendra2 on Oct 18, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that pat robertson is a lunatic has a couple of broken antennae, don't they? and look at the idiots from "Regent Law School" ensconced in the Bush Crime Family regime, now illegally in our White House, the house of the citizens of the United States of America???????? well, do you need further indicators that those two Right Wing "Christian" American Taliban????????? yogi, tucson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jon E.
Posted by: Jon E. on Oct 19, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some quick observations on this:

1. Like the posters at this site, this student knows little or nothing about Regent University. Just one example: Key has said several times that Regent is a Protestant university. It is not. It is a Christian university that deliberately includes both Catholics and Protestants on its faculty and in its administration, and the only faith-based university in the country that does so.  It also accepts students of any faith persuasion or even no faith in its classrooms.  A walk on the campus will show anyone who bothers to actually visit the university that there are students wearing yarmulkes. Is he so blind in his hatred of Regent that he did not see them or the crucifixes on the Catholics or the Arab students?

2. The student is being disciplined because he insulted a person not because he expressed an idea.  Students like this one are poisonous in the classroom precisely because they focus on the trivial and try and cause fights about people rather than a discussion about the ideas and concepts being taught.  They destroy the possibilities of learning for the other students.  Had he attacked or mocked another student or faculty member in this way he would be out in a second at any university, private or public.  Regent has been too kind to him.

3. In the wake of Virginia Tech even mentioning firearms in the classroom raises the most serious of questions. Despite what Key says, three Regent students have come forward to say he mentioned guns to them. Regent administrators would be held legally responsible if his comments were brought to their attention and they had done nothing. God forbid something had actually happened. Then people would be saying Regent did far too little.

4. This is a student who came to a university with an agenda and a determination to make the university look bad. He has no right to do so on its campus. Let him continue his jihad against the university from the outside.

5. How could any Christian university stand aside and allow any individual to be personally attacked and say they are upholding Christ’s principles?

Just some thoughts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]