Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Vatican Official Caught Soliciting Sex From Young Man On Hidden Camera, Insists He's Not Gay

Posted by John Aravosis at 5:01 AM on October 15, 2007.


John Aravosis: How do you say "wide stance" in Italian?
aleqm5jvk4z4dpdwf5y4ds6edj6zaffnw
Stenico

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by John Aravosis, originally appeared on AMERICABlog

How do you say "wide stance" in Italian?

A Vatican official suspended after being caught on hidden camera making advances to a young man said in an interview published Sunday that he is not gay and was only pretending to be gay as part of his work.
In an interview with La Repubblica newspaper, Monsignor Tommaso Stenico said he frequented online gay chat rooms and met with gay men as part of his work as a psychoanalyst. He said that he pretended to be gay in order to gather information about "those who damage the image of the Church with homosexual activity."
...
The Vatican said Saturday it was suspending Stenico after he was secretly filmed making advances to a young man and asserting that gay sex was not sinful during a television program on gay priests broadcast Oct. 1 on La7, a private Italian television network.

While Stenico's face was blurred in the footage, church officials recognized his Vatican office in the background and suspended him pending a church investigation.
There have long been allegations that there are gays in the Roman Catholic priesthood, but the Stenico case is unusual because he is a relatively high-ranking Vatican official. He heads an office in the Vatican's Congregation for Clergy — the main office overseeing all the world's priests.
This entire Craig, Vatican, situation really is starting to sound an awful lot like that incredible Onion piece from a few years back (careful, it's not work-friendly at all, includes sexual language, etc - click here.)

Digg!

Tagged as: catholic church, homosexuality, child molestation, stenico

John Aravosis is a Washington DC-based writer and political strategist, specializing in using the Internet for political advocacy.


Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Murdoch and Murdoch Flak Confused About Racism, Truth
What must it be like to do spin for News Corps?
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who cares?
Posted by: edraven on Oct 15, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His activity can't possibly hurt anyone more than the teachings of the church.

Ed Graham

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'posizione larga'
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Oct 15, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mama mia! that's a spicy meatball!

wwjd? i don't think he'd suffer the children to 'come unto' him like that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How do you say "wide stance" in Italian?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Oct 15, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
POSIZIONE LARGA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares?
Posted by: Intellect on Oct 15, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the "young man" was not an underage minor, SO WHAT?

If the young man was of age, who cares?

Except religious nutballs.

Religion Spoils Everything!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]