Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Are You a Criminal? Then the U.S. Army Wants You!

Posted by GottaLaff at 2:00 PM on October 11, 2007.


GottaLaff: Ex-cons and high school drop outs are welcomed in the US Army now more than ever.
unclesam
uncle sam

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by GottaLaff, originally appeared on Cliff Schecter's Brave New Films Blog

The Army has met its recruiting numbers. Why? Because ex-cons and high school drop outs are welcomed in more than ever:

The U.S. Army met its recruiting goals for the last year but enlisted thousands of new soldiers with criminal records and fewer who have earned high school diplomas, according to figures released Wednesday.

The spike of new enlistees given "character" waivers for fiscal 2007 continues a steady upward trend in the number of recruits with past arrests and convictions allowed into the Army since the start of the war in Iraq.

I wonder, did Bush get a character waiver before running for office?

But back to numbers: More than 11% of the recruits needed waivers for problems with the law, up nearly 8% from the previous year, and double what it was in 2003.

Epiphany! Maybe the Iraq fiasco has something to do with it! Not that being an unprotected target of suicide bombers and IEDs would be a deterrent. Or knowing that it's an illegal war. Or that Blackwater employees would be getting paid a lot more than you.

Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank, said the data indicate that the Army has lowered the bar on whom it allows into the service while providing further evidence signaling Americans' disenchantment with the war in Iraq. "This is a recipe for disaster," said Korb, a former assistant secretary of defense during the Reagan administration. "In the long term this can be a serious problem for the military."

That madcap Korb, always understating the situation.

Beth Asch, a senior economist and expert on military recruitment and retention at the Rand Corp.:

"One reason you don't bring in non-grads is they tend not to complete things," Asch said. "People who are better educated tend to be learners and the military needs life-long learners."

Our Life-Long Learnerererer-In-Chief went to Yale. That must be why he's the big boss of them.

If he can be in charge of our entire military, then I guess complaints about ex-cons are unfounded.

Compared to Bush, they're overqualified.

Digg!

Tagged as: us military, recruitment, us troops

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Hey Netherlands: Fox "News" Hates You! (VIDEO)
Oh, it's not just the pot and the hookers ...
Post by PZ Myers. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Still better than a draft
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 12, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I joined the Military in 1988 I needed a waiver. Why? Because I received two tickets about 6 months prior. One for speeding and one for an expired inspection sticker. So just because someone needed a waiver doesn't automatically mean they are a felon. The waivers are usually for traffic infractions and misdemeanors.
During the 90's there was the drawdown of the military. The Army went from 19 active duty divisions to 11. Being the Army was shrinking they could afford to be picky with new recruits. Now with less people willing to join, at the same time the military is expanding, it only makes sense to be less picky.
The military is probably the biggest opponent of the draft. (After all who wants to try to teach someone that doesn't want to be there?) So they're doing everything they can to meet recruiting needs with out it. More advertising, more recruiters, enlistment bonuses up to 30 thousand, Re-enlistment bonuses up to 35 thousand, added benefits etc.
If the Army could only take people with spotless records then they would never meet the required recruiting needs and that would leave only one alternative.
So go ahead and leave the negative comments, call me a troll, rate me a 1 but that doesn't change the cold hard facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is nothing new
Posted by: mnascimento on Oct 12, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the author think that the military in past wars was composed of only the best and brightest?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is nothing new Posted by: realist
» RE: This is nothing new Posted by: hilaryuk
Draft
Posted by: frank69 on Oct 13, 2007 2:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a draft. A draft with no exemptions. Well, if you're blind, or have lost a limb or two, or are unable to walk, then you're exempt. The initial draftees will be the sons, daughters, nephews and nieces, and grandchildren, of all the members of both Congress and the Administration. Next, the same groups from people whose incomes are above $1,000,000. Next, from people with incomes above $100,000 and higher. Come to think of it, that might well satisfy the entire draft! FYI, I am a veteran of 28 years active duty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Draft Posted by: donl51