Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Young People Rejecting Christianity, Have Perception of Religion as Homophobic

Posted by Sara Robinson at 5:31 AM on October 10, 2007.


Sara Robinson: Evangelical Christianity won't go away, but there's a shift in its essential character afoot, which may even reverse the trend toward minority status over time.
cross

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Sara Robinson, originally appeared on Orcinus

I've been saying for a while now that the religious right in America finally and firmly jumped the shark over the past few years. But now that that big ol' shark's behind them, there's another bunch of critters looming ahead that may prove to be even more damning. It's that whole big flock of chickens that are finally coming home to roost.

I don't know how long they thought they were going to go on that way, all self-righteous and judgmental, blaming homosexuals and feminists for everything from 9/11 to the price of gas, ignoring the interests of the poor in favor of those of big business, and dismissing any kind of environmental stewardship as nothing more than a way to waste time until the Rapture comes. Clearly, the didn't see anything at all wrong with elevating the most spiteful and amoral among them as their national spokespeople, and rewarding them in direct proportion to the heat of their rhetoric. No, these folks were on fire (we're still not sure if it was Jesus or heartburn), and they weren't afraid to let their bilious light shine on the TV, in the streets, all the way to the White House. They did their best to set it high above the rest of the culture, where none of the rest of us could miss it if we wanted to.

And now, a new study reveals that young Americans, both inside and outside Christianity, have indeed taken note of this righteous spectacle-- and a large and growing majority of them are absolutely revolted by what they've seen.

A study released last week by the Barna Group, a reputable Evangelical research and polling firm, found that under-30s -- both Christian and non-Christian -- are strikingly more critical of Christianity than their peers were just a decade ago. According to the summary report, Barna pollster David Kinnaman found that the opinions of non-Christians, in particular, had slid like a rock in that time frame. Ten years ago, "the vast majority" of non-Christians had generally favorable views of Christianity. Now, that number stands at just 16%. When asked specifically about Evangelicals, the number are even worse: only 3% of non-Christian Millennials have positive associations with Evangelicals. Among the Boomers, it's eight times higher.

When Kinnaman asked senior pastors if they were seeing this too, half of them told him that, yes, they are finding their work to be an uphill battle -- "because people are increasingly hostile and negative toward Christianity." And his research bore this out. When he ranked young non-Christians' most common perceptions of Christianity, nine of the 12 most common attributes they named were negative ones. According to the study, "Common negative perceptions include that present-day Christianity is judgmental (87%), hypocritical (85%), old-fashioned (78%), and too involved in politics (75%)."

And this wasn't just ignorance talking. The people interviewed had an average of five Christian friends. Eighty percent of them had spent at least six months attending church themselves in the past; and half of them had considered becoming Christian, but rejected it. Familiarity with the faith, it appears, has bred quite a bit of contempt:

"As we probed why young people had come to such conclusions, I was surprised how much their perceptions were rooted in specific stories and personal interactions with Christians and in churches. When they labeled Christians as judgmental this was not merely spiritual defensiveness. It was frequently the result of truly 'unChristian' experiences. We discovered that the descriptions that young people offered of Christianity were more thoughtful, nuanced, and experiential than expected."

Some of the young adults' disdain for Christianity is the result of another new wrinkle that was nowhere on the scene a decade ago. The study found that 91% of non-Christians in America -- joined by 80% of the their peers in the pews -- now believe that Christianity is "anti-homosexual." (Gee. I can't imagine where they got that idea.) And no, they don't mean that in a good, God-fearing, General-JC-Christian sort of way. In the Barna summary, Kinnaman says, "Non-Christians and Christians explained that beyond their recognition that Christians oppose homosexuality, they believe that Christians show excessive contempt and unloving attitudes towards gays and lesbians. One of the most frequent criticisms of young Christians was that they believe the church has made homosexuality a "bigger sin" than anything else. Moreover, they claim that the church has not helped them apply the biblical teaching on homosexuality to their friendships with gays and lesbians."

Yeah, well, it's hard to find a practical way to apply a contradiction like "hate the sin, love the sinner" -- especially when everybody who isn't an ideologue knows that the "sin" is a pre-determined biological trait.

Roughly a quarter of both the Christians and non-Christians in the under-30 group also mentioned -- without being prompted -- that "Christianity has changed from what it used to be," and that it "no longer looks like Jesus." Their sheer frustration level over how far the modern Christianity had deviated from its roots took Kinnaman by surprise:

In our interviews, we kept encountering young people - both those inside the church and outside of it - who said that something was broken in the present-day expression of Christianity. Their perceptions about Christianity were not always accurate, but what surprised me was not only the severity of their frustration with Christians, but also how frequently young born again Christians expressed some of the very same comments as young non-Christians."

And, to top it all off, Kinnaman found that the American population as a whole is on a long-term trendline that's moving the country away from Christianity. "This is not a passing fad wherein young people will become 'more Christian' as they grow up," the Barna report states. "While Christianity remains the typical experience and most common faith in America, a fundamental recalibration is occurring within the spiritual allegiance of America's upcoming generations." This trendline points to a far more diverse -- and possibly more secular -- nation in the decades ahead:

Click for larger version
(click for larger version)

This study is prompting quite a bit of soul-searching among Evangelicals. Some feel this study verifies things they've long suspected; others are just stunned. Maybe it's the way everybody's always ignored their persistent conversion efforts -- they just got so used to being tuned out by the mainstream culture that it never occurred to them that anyone might ever take anything they said seriously. And now, they're genuinely surprised to find out that yes, we were listening -- and yes, we did take it all very much to heart. And, furthermore, what we've heard has deeply damaged our opinion of them.

It seems likely that this study will trigger the persecution reflex among the more reactionary and defensive factions of the religious right. They've always felt like an embattled minority; and this report just proves what they've always intuited, which is that they're living amid a dominant culture that's increasingly hostile to their beliefs. (Some groups seem poised to honestly examine their own role in fostering that hostility; however, the more radical a group is, the less likely they are to bother with this.)

But at least it will be harder now for them to delude themselves that their efforts to drag us into theocracy are succeeding. The Barna numbers clearly show that the goal of making America a Christian nation is actually receding into the distance as successive generations turn away from the faith -- in no small part because they're gagging on the overwhelming authoritarian stench that's seeped in from the extremist edges toward the great middle.

But the study also opens the way for new developments that may prove to be very positive -- both for Christians, and for secular America.

-- There's a surprisingly unified sense between young adults, both inside and outside the faith, that the divisive, judgmental authoritarianism that's dominated Evangelical Christianity for the past 30 years has run its course. Furthermore: the "insiders" (as Barna terms Christians) see the same issues and agree with many of the criticisms as those on the outside -- and are openly talking about taking their theology in some new directions. There's an emerging sense that it's time to let go of the harsh legalism that's defined American Protestantism for the past three decades, and return to something more like the Social Gospel that demanded more of Christians than merely passing judgment on the details of other people's lives.

-- With the publication of this study, homosexuality's long, mean run as the hot-button issue that reliably rallies the faithful is probably finished. When even the next generation of Christians thinks their elders' behavior on this issue is useless and shameful, even the most die-hard culture warriors will be forced to admit that this battle is finally over -- and they lost.

As more and more Evangelical groups read the writing on the wall and back away from the issue, it may mean that full equality for gays comes considerably faster and with far less resistance than it has in the past.

-- This study gives lots of ammunition to would-be reformers within the Christian movement, and will thus hasten the demise of the old-guard leaders who built vast empires on gay-hating and abortion-baiting. Last year, Rev. Joel Hunter resigned as the head of the Christian Coalition after just three weeks after being hired because the board refused to let him back away from abortion and homosexuality as their key issues, and re-orient the group toward issues like social justice and the environment, which he argued were more interesting to younger Christians. This report gives strong support to reform-minded leaders like Hunter, so we may see more of them emerging to take the Christian right in new directions over the next few years.

-- The long-term trend toward a less Christian nation is probably good news for liberalism in general. If there are comparatively fewer Christians, there will be more people of other faiths -- though other Barna studies have found that the biggest gains of all are being made among atheist and agnostic free-thinkers, who are also the most likely to be political liberals. This, in turn, bodes well for the various scientific fields that have come under attack by the religious right; and it opens the way for Christians and non-Christians to find some fresh common ground on issues like social justice and the environment as the religious leadership changes.

Overall, the new Barna study seems to offer some hopeful prospects for a more generally liberal and diverse America in the decades ahead. Evangelical Christianity won't go away -- but there's a shift in its essential character afoot, which may even reverse the trend toward minority status over time. And it seem likely that big changes are coming that will not only make it more progressive in its view of its own mission; but will also make it a much better friend to democracy than it's been in recent years.

Digg!

Tagged as: raw diet, youth, homophobia, religious right, christianity

Sara Robinson has worked as an editor or columnist for several national magazines, on beats as varied as sports, travel, and the Olympics; and has contributed to over 80 computer games for EA, Lucasfilm, Disney, and many other companies.


Rumsfeld Blames the Generals for Poor Pre-War Planning
Shorter Rumsfeld: The buck does not stop here.
Post by Satyam Khanna. May 9, 2008.
Has Politics Jumped the Shark?
When will the entertainment press (and the electorate) tire of our latest reality show?
Post by Digby. May 9, 2008.
Bipartisan Majority Defies Bush Over Mortgage Crisis
The House defies Bush's veto threat on legislation to help families hurt by the crisis.
Post by Howie Klein. May 9, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank ...
Posted by: OldRedleg on Oct 10, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God, Yahweh, Allah, Buddha, Karma, the Force, the Spaghetti Monster, or whomever you may put your trust or beliefs in for a better world and future. Any religion that demands absolute obedience to the interpretations of its mortal and/or human interpreters has no place in an enlightened world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank ... Posted by: Stomper
» RE: Thank ... Posted by: Lauren
Venceremos!
Posted by: reval on Oct 10, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the voices of sanity and reason will prevail after all.

Rev. El
Pastor, WVCSR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stevor
Posted by: stevor on Oct 10, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's too bad that standards of behavior have been tossed out the window. Yeah, just do whatever you want and don't answer to anybody. After all, Bill Clinton and a lot of other politicians and celebreties get away with it all the time! It's okay that AIDS was spread by such an attitude, gambling and throwing away money that families need is encouraged by our governments, and all the rest. You don't have to answer to anybody, or do you? Well, if you don't believe in God, maybe he'll go away too and you won't have to answer to him.
No, religion has nothing to do with homophobia. Lack of religion has to do with homosexuals and lesbians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stevor Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» perhaps a VINN diagram would help Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: stevor Posted by: Belter
» RE: stevor Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: stevor Posted by: threecolors
» Stevor Posted by: RevJDSpears
» RE: Stevor Posted by: threecolors
» RE: Stevor Posted by: Lauren
» RE ligion... Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: stevor Posted by: Offbelay
we have an idiot 'christian' 'minister' coming to our campus regularly
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Oct 10, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who calls the students whores and whoremongers. what a great way to sell your product!

minister: yer a damned filthy sinner

student: where do i sign up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sounds like a sh*tty puppet show Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Religion=Anti-Sex
Posted by: TheNamelessCity on Oct 10, 2007 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that's all it amounts to anymore. Forget about charity, generosity, forgiveness, turning the other cheek, these wacked-out religious nuts have turned religion into little more than a force opposed to sex, sexuality, and sexual autonomy. In the US it's nutty Christofascists opposing sex, in other parts of the world it's Islamonuts, etc. Their anti-sex preachings are making the rest of us wonder if that's all religion is about...controlling sex...and the more this happens the better, as religion's credibility will be wrecked and its true agenda revealed: to enforce conformity through fear, hate, and intimidation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eligion=Anti-Sex Posted by: Stomper
Young people rejecting Christianity
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 10, 2007 10:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
:D

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Collision
Posted by: Bbear41 on Oct 10, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand that Evangelical churches are growing and the numbers of the unchurched are growing. This could lead to social war. The religious right will conclude that only a coup and surpression of the constitution will 'save' America. The evangelicals are trying to push the military into accepting "God Law" over the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Collision Posted by: Lauren
"Great Revivals" are a historical pattern in the US.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 10, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have already had 3 such recorded in our history, dating back to the 1700s and as recently as the period of the Great Depression and WWII. So now we have had a 4th.

I don't know my history well enough to know how long they last, but if the current one is peetering out, it's been around for at least 25 years. I suspect that's about average.

One of the consequences is that mainline and liberal churches benefit from the fallout. Folks who are introduced to organized religion and then outgrow its orthodox versions go looking for something that makes more sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How shall we interpret the Barna study?
Posted by: rileycase on Oct 10, 2007 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before we jump to quickly to conclusions, let consider for a moment what is going on in regard to culture and Christian faith. The other side of the Barna report is that in America church adherence is at an all-time high with about 200 million (or 67% of the total population) identifying with a Christian church or one kind or another. At the same time the general culture is becoming more secular. People have been predicting the demise of evangelical Christianity in America for a long time (Harvey Cox, for example 45 years ago in The Secular City). Still, it prevails and if anything is growing stronger. One could suggest, in fact, that negative attitudes toward evangelical Christianity are aggravated by the fact that evangelical Christians are everywhere around us. If, indeed, evangelical Christianity were declining, its influence would be declining and people would tend not to care one way or another. Part of the antagonism toward evangelical Christianity is the view that there is some similarity between fundamentalist Muslims and fundamentalist Christians (which has no basis in fact). Since culture seems less friendly to Christianity that in previous times Christianity must now (or least soon) see itself in minority status (not in terms of numbers but in terms of perception). Thus Christianity in America will be more like the early church, aliens in a foreign land. This is not necessarily bad. Christianity has not done particularly well (at least in recent times) when alligned too closely to the state. If, as several have commented, there is increasing skepticism about evangelical Christianity it would stand to reason that people would be gravitating toward mainline, liberal, and tolerant denominations. There is nothing to suggest that is happening. Indeed, liberal Christianity is failing on every side. What does all this mean? Cultural wars intensifying for one. More soul-searching within the evangelical communities. All in all, it is an exciting time to be alive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recogninig hypocrisy
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 10, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about time people started noticing what a bunch of filthy hypocrites these "born agains" and their preachers really are. While I am an agnostic I think anyone would be stupid who can't see these SOBs are not about anything in Jesus Christ's teachings. They are about "show me the money" and sucking up to that pack of corporate whores in the White House.

Any kid with a decent (Is there such a thing in the USA anymore?) high school education should be able to see that this bunch is dumber than dirt and anyone who follows them is a moron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anecdotal support
Posted by: Stomper on Oct 10, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I teach the high school Sunday School class at our relatively liberal United Methodist church. I'm pleased to report that, when I presented a lesson about homosexuality, there was no discussion or dispute. The 15 or more kids simply did not see this as an issue.

I pointed out the Old Testament rules for punishing homosexual behavior (not the status, mind you, just the behavior). Then I reminded the kids that we have a New Covenant, which substitutes general principles of love, forgiveness and grace for the rigid micromanagement of the Old Testament: "Judge not, lest ye be judged;" "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone;" refrain from pointing out the mote in your neighbor's eye, until you have dealt with the log in your own eye; anyone can be nice to the good people, but we are challeneged to minister to the sinners, etc. In sum, sin is still out there (we are all sinners), but sin is a personal matter between the sinner and God, rather than a community issue. It is not up to us to enforce God's laws; God is perfectly capable of enforcing His own laws as He sees fit.

I expected at least one of the kids to speak out against homosexuality. It never happened. Consistent with the study's reported findings, the kids simply did not find this to be a polarizing issue -- or any kind of issue, for that matter. I suspect they would be suspicious or downright derisive toward anyone who tried to convince them homosexual behavior is somehow a bigger sin than any other sin (if it is a sin at all . . .).

On the other hand, I did get a fair amount of discussion about Christ's instruction to "turn the other cheek" and forego violence. That lesson was much harder for the kids to accept.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christians Don't Read the Bible
Posted by: tommy1957 on Oct 10, 2007 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with christians is that they don't follow the teachings of Christ who taught tolerance and love. The conviently refer to the old testament to comit murder in the name of god. Alas they are loosing the battle for the hearts and minds of the American yooth. Let us pray; dear what ever, please deliver mankind from the lies that have been inbedded in the minds of the ignorant who believe in what ever. Hey people listen up. There is no god, never was. Only jackasses who seeked to rule over man by creating myths or what you call today god. You are such a bunch of stupid fucking fools. All that time wasted on worshiping nothing. You could better serve humanity by creating something good, rather than spreading your filthy words of intollerance. Oh, by the way, "Have a Great Day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This stuff has gone global - wait until you see it from the 3rd world
Posted by: Jasonix on Oct 10, 2007 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American Fundamentalism may be in decline, but the sects that it has spawned in Africa, Asia, and South America may imperil the world in decades to come. The Fundamentalists exported their worst features - apocalyptic "Rapture" ideas, young-earth creationism, speaking in tongues, and hostility toward secular society - to poverty and plague-stricken regions of the world, where it has merged with the worst elements in the local culture to produce dangerous cults that make the Christian Right in the USA look like the Unitarians.

We've already seen some of these mutant sects cause damage here in the U.S. The Unification Church (the Moonies) has built a business empire worth billions and commands the attention of Republican politicians. A Russian cult of self-proclaimed "Baptists" is assaulting homosexuals in the western U.S. In Uganda, churches preaching the imminent end-of-the-world are making people think that it's pointless to work for a better future. Pat Robertson has lobbied on behalf of African dictators who call themselves "Christians" but who serve diamond-mining interests. When I was in India last year, I found John Hagee, Benny Hinn, and the worst of the Pentecostal "health and wealth" preachers spreading their nonsense. These preachers not only spread their ideas about the end of the world and the way to heaven, but they spread their political ideas about free market fundamentalism, global warming denial, and other right-wing staples.

About 10 years ago, I met a young woman trained at a fundamentalist seminary who was raising money to go on a missions trip to Russia. She was preaching the Rapture and the imminent end of the world. I pleaded with her to stick to the basics of the Christian Gospel - forgiveness and redemption. She rebuffed me and said I could "count on" her spreading Dispensationalism and end-times teachings in Russia.

Fundamentalism may be on its way out in the U.S., but we've only just begun to see its global impact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ridiculous article... (1 of 2 parts)
Posted by: Smartcookie on Oct 11, 2007 8:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an atheist who grew up under christian fundamentalism...

Why is it that authors of articles such as these have no deep and subtle understanding of many factions of christianity? Especially in interpreting the bible. Mainstream christianity has been far and away non-christian for many years, the mainstream versions are basically raving lunatics, a bunch of hypocritical non-thinkers, as many true fundamentalists would point out as fulfilled prophecy (the mystery of iniquity paul talked about that was at work in his day -- apostate christians that claim the name of god but are not)

I can make the argument VERY SIMPLE, christianity stands or falls upon the resurrection of christ, if christ believed adam and moses were real (as he did)

Many EXPERT fair minded fundamentalist christians (they take it as a compliment) hae summed it up thus, the christian liberals are not christians in the slightest.. anyone who doesn't believe in a real adam, moses, jesus, and sin, are clearly in violation of the biblical gods teaching:

(From Gods truth by Alan Hayward -- http://www.godstruth.org/chap15 )

Now when Jesus and the apostles referred to Old Testament history, they never spoke about it in “parable style”. They always treated it as accurate history. True, they did draw lessons from it, but they made it plain that these were lessons drawn from real life. When Paul based some lessons on a series of episodes from the history of Israel,

he said:

“These things happened unto them by way of example, and they were written for our admonition.”10

These things happened. Actually happened. Could words be plainer than that?

As for Jesus, He spoke of many incidents in the Old Testament, including:

The story of Adam and Eve11

The murder of Abel by Cain12

Noah and the flood13

The destruction of Sodom and the death of Lot’s wife14

Moses and the burning bush15

The manna that fell from heaven16

Solomon and the Queen of Sheba17

Elijah and a miracle18

Elisha and another miracle19

Jonah and the whale20

Turn up these passages in your own Bible. See for yourself how Jesus obviously believed that all these events really did occur.

There is another big snag about saying the Bible is “religiously true but historically unreliable”. The historical and religious strands of the Bible are intertwined like the threads in a Persian carpet. How are we going to separate them? In fact, no two scholars seem to agree on which bits are “historical” and which are “religious”.

Take the story that Jesus rose from the dead. We meet it in all four gospels, in the books of Acts and Revelation, and in several of the epistles. It is presented to us in these books as a historical fact. For this reason many scholars feel free to reject it as a myth.

But it is more than a historical fact. It is also presented to us as a foundation stone of the Christian religion. Listen to the apostle

Paul: “How say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen, and if Christ be not risen then is our preaching vain and your faith is also vain.... If Christ be not raised your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins!”21
(continued in part 2)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ridiculous article... (2 of 2 parts)
Posted by: Smartcookie on Oct 11, 2007 9:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there is the problem that if Christ really was wrong in His teaching about the Old Testament, how can we be sure of anything else He taught? He backed up His claim to be the Son of God with a quotation from the Psalms, saying as He did so, “And the Scripture

cannot be broken!”22 If He was wrong about Scripture, how do we know that He was not wrong about being Son of God?

He said that resurrection and eternal life could be relied upon because of what the book of Exodus said.23 If He was wrong about the book of Exodus, how do we know that He was not wrong about eternal life?

Lots of Bible-believing theologians have asked this kind of question.24 But so far as I know, nobody has ever given them a reasonable answer.

It is not surprising there has been a steady drift away from this “half and half” position. The drift has mainly been in the direction of complete unbelief, but quite a number of scholars have moved in the opposite direction towards complete belief. There may be some difficulties connected with wholehearted belief. But there are far greater problems facing those who try to believe only parts of the Bible. There is an increasing awareness of this fact among thinking Christians today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrates
Posted by: kawaiirobo on Oct 12, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, just wow, can you people not see the forest for the trees? Being tolerant of others means tolerating those you don't agree with, and even those who aren't tolerant of you. I'm not a Christian, and have had bad experiences in the past with Christians as well, but I still tolerate their constitutional right to be what they want to be, you all are screaming about Christians being intolerant so loudly that you can't hear your own intolerance towards them. Do you people even understand what tolerance means? It's easy to tolerate what you agree with it's another to live and let others do the same. Now I already can see the comments about how Christians don't let you live how you want to live and what not, but be honest, has anyone ever stopped you from being who you are? I doubt it, and even if you bring up "your conservative/Christian parents" that's fine, they did wrong, hate them, but don't blame an entire (large mind you) group of people for the actions of a few, that is no different than racism, or any other form of prejudice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrates Posted by: Stomper
» RE: Hypocrates Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Hypocrates Posted by: Troglodyke