Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Warner Bros. Officially No Longer Making Movies With Female Leads

Posted by Melissa McEwan at 12:00 PM on October 9, 2007.


Melissa McEwan: I'm sure Vin Diesel would make a lovely Lois Lane.
thebraveone.preview
After anchoring recent hits like Flightplan and Panic Room, Jodie Foster suffered a rare flop with The Brave One, prompting Warner Bros' head of production to allegedly put a stop to all films with female leads at the studio.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Melissa McEwan, originally appeared on Shakesville

Warner Bros president of production Jeff Robinov has made a new decree that "We are no longer doing movies with women in the lead". This Neanderthal thinking comes after both Jodie Foster's The Brave One (even though she's had big recent hits with Flightplan and Panic Room) and Nicole Kidman's The Invasion (as if three different directors didn't have something to do with the awfulness of the gross receipts) under-performed at the box office recently. ... Of course, Warner Bros has always been male-centric in its movies. But now the official policy as expressly articulated by Robinov is that a male has to be the lead of every pic made. I'm told he doesn't even want to see a script with a woman in the primary position (which now is apparently missionary at WB).

Gloria Allred is decidedly unpleased, saying if the studio "confirms that their policy is to now exclude women as leads, then my policy would be to boycott films made by Warner Bros." In that eventuality, I would hope that every actress in Hollywood does the same. Then Warner Bros. can go back to making movies the old-fashioned way. I'm sure Vin Diesel would make a lovely Lois Lane.

Shaker GayAsXmas, who gets the hat tip, says via email: "[T]here are actresses out there who could make credible action heroes (Angelina Jolie, Jessica Biel, Jennifer Garner, Gina Torres) but [aren't given the opportunity] due to a fundamental lack of imagination from the mostly male Hollywood culture. Just give Joss Whedon $50 million and let him play with it, dammit!" Sing it, brotha.

Of course, it's not just action films that WB is unwilling to make with female leads, but all films. Every genre is to be female lead-free--because, evidently, teh bitchez is Hollywood poison!

I know it's a crazy suggestion, but maybe WB could just try making movies with female leads that people actually want to see before giving up on teh womminz altogether. And, while you're at it, perhaps you could try something original. This precludes endless derivations of Steel Magnolias in which eclectic groups of sassy women are bound by their patronage of the same salon, a book/foodie/quilting club, or magical pants. It also precludes remakes and/or thinly veiled modernizations of Jane Austen's stories, especially Sense & Sensibility, Pride & Prejudice, and Emma. It yet further precludes various bastard children of The Odd Couple and Cagney & Lacey. All of these things have been done, and often done well.

Don't try to give us Clarice Starling 2007. Give us a whole new goddamned character. Or open a history book and acquaint yourselves with one of the many women throughout history whose amazing stories would make compelling biopics. I don't need one more fucking picture about Queen Elizabeth I, no matter how well it's done. On the other hand, give me L. Scott Caldwell as Ida B. Wells and I'll consider paying your exorbitant ticket price.

The truth is, I'm just not interesting in paying money to see talented women play hookers, strippers, bimbos, witches, psychos, and second-fiddle to tiny actors with veneered grins. When Kelly McGillis is the Top Gun, give me a call.

Oh--and one more suggestion. When you've got a film with a female lead in the can, try actually marketing it. I never even heard of The Invasion until it was already out of theaters, but, despite barely watching any network television, I can't seem to escape adverts for the truly stinktastic-looking The Heartbreak Kid, which is Dreamworks not WB, but wev, you get my point. Invest in female leads like you do male leads--and that includes occasionally casting a woman who's been seen on film before, instead of constantly casting the ingénue of the month--and I bet you'll find you get similar returns on that investment.

Just saying.

UPDATE More on this story here.

Digg!

Tagged as: warner brothers, film, sexism, women, hollywood

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Election Activists Win Three Key Battles
In Missouri, Arizona and Washington, D.C., voting rights advocates block and remove barriers to voting.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. May 16, 2008.
Republicans Are Hoping That Democrats Will Win - Then Fail
Why Republicans are OK with losing in 2008.
Post by Digby. May 16, 2008.
Wages of Sin, We Keep Paying
The Bush Administration is learning that we reap what we sow in Iraq.
Post by Spencer Ackerman. May 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where are Hollywood's female leaders?
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 9, 2007 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unprecedented numbers of women have the wealth and freedom to produce their own projects -- yet we're still begging table scraps from the bottom-of-the-creative-class barrel.

Where are the film industry's female leaders? Marketing and distribution's a whole new animal with the Internet in play. Blair Witch Project producers filmed the whole thing on credit cards.

Script it, film it, podcast it, send it straight to DVD.

Groveling before the big man with the cigar's over. These guys are only still in charge because they're tolerated.

Nobody with talent, industry savvy and a plan needs them anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shame. The new Foster flick looks good enough to rent...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 9, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as soon as my public library carries it.

Thought she was great in Maverick and 'Nell, and pretty good in The Accused. Pretty well rounded actress!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares? Hollywood rarely puts out any movies worth watching anyway. And
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 9, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the odd one-off movie they make that is decent it is either a remake of a European film, a remake of an old American film, or is much better explored by reading the book on which the movie is based. It seems that Hollywood likes computer animations and special effects rather than plot or character anyway, so why should we care who "gets the lead"? The "lead" will still invariably be a shallow, uncomplecated person that will be over-shadowed by stuff blowing-up and computer generated effects that will make epileptics have a fit and the rest of us get a headache.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Lieutenant Nun
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Oct 10, 2007 2:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the author asked why wouldnt Hollywood look at the many wonderful stories about women through History, I couldnt but think of "La Monja Alferez", the Lieutenant Nun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalina_de_Erauso

A Teen that in the early 17th century flees the convent she has lived all her life, poses like a man and become a soldier, a duelist, a gambler and an entrepeneur. A truly amazing life of a woman, and it has all the action, thrill and romance a good adventure movie needs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
So much for Warner Brothers
Posted by: phrogg40 on Oct 10, 2007 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will, and I think we all should, boycot Warner Brothers for this discriminative action! And to those who say Who Cares, you are part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]