Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Right Wing Launches Baseless Smear Campaign Against 12 Year Old Recipient Of SCHIP

Posted by Faiz Shakir at 5:09 AM on October 9, 2007.


Faiz Shakir: Michelle Malkin showed up at his family's home and business. A co-worker told her they were "struggling" but Malkin refused to believe it.
frost1
Graeme Frost

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Faiz Shakir, originally appeared on Think Progress

Two weeks ago, the Democratic radio address was delivered by a 12-year old Maryland boy named Graeme Frost. Graeme told his story of being involved in a severe car accident three years ago, and having received access to medical care because of the Children's Health Insurance Program. He said:

If it weren't for CHIP, I might not be here today. ... We got the help we needed because we had health insurance for us through the CHIP program. But there are millions of kids out there who don't have CHIP, and they wouldn't get the care that my sister and I did if they got hurt. ...I just hope the President will listen to my story and help other kids to be as lucky as me.

The right-wing immediately condemned Democrats for daring to put a human face on the SCHIP program at a time when Bush was proposing a "diminishment of the number of children covered." Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) -- who has posed with children to advance his own political agenda -- claimed Graeme was being used "as a human shield."

Conservatives have more recently turned their targets on young Graeme Frost himself. A poster at the Free Republic propagated information alleging that Frost was actually a rich kid being pampered by the government. Among other bits of information, the post by the Freeper "icwhatudo" asserts that Graeme and his sister Gemma attend wealthy schools that cost "nearly $40,000 per year for tuition" and live in a well-off home.

The smear attack against Graeme has taken firm hold in the right-wing blogosphere. The National Review, Michelle Malkin, Wizbang, Powerline, and the Weekly Standard blog have all launched assaults on the Frost family. The story is slowly working its way into traditional media outlets as well.

Here are the facts that the right-wing distorted in order to attack young Graeme:

1) Graeme has a scholarship to a private school. The school costs $15K a year, but the family only pays $500 a year.

2) His sister Gemma attends another private school to help her with the brain injuries that occurred due to her accident. The school costs $23,000 a year, but the state pays the entire cost.

3) They bought their "lavish house" sixteen years ago for $55,000 at a time when the neighborhood was less than safe.

4) Last year, the Frost's made $45,000 combined. Over the past few years they have made no more than $50,000 combined.

5) The state of Maryland has found them eligible to participate in the CHIP program.

Desperate to defend Bush's decision to cut off millions of children from health care, the right wing has stooped to launching baseless and uninformed attacks against a 12 year old child and his family.

Right wing bloggers have been harassing the Frosts, calling their home numerous times to get information about their private lives. Compassionate conservatism indeed.

UPDATE: TP commenter Mr. Ed notes that Malkin visited the Frost's home and business today. A coworker of Mr. Frost tells Malkin that the family is "struggling," but she refuses to believe it.

UPDATE II: More from John Aravosis, Whiskey Fire, All Spin Zone, and Matt Ortega.

Digg!

Tagged as: right wing media, malkin, s-chip, health care, conservatives, frost

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Editor of ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report.


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republicans try this trick also but it seems Democrats have mastered it.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 9, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole idea of "putting a face" to an issue so that the issue becomes a matter of emotion, rather than logic or economics, is an age-old tactic. Republicans perfer the old "waving the bloodyshirt" or "waving the flag" and Democrats like to trot out a sick kid. Either way the intent is that 1) you don't think but feel and 2) you cannot attack, or even question, a kid (or the 'flag').

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Infant Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Infant Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Troll Alert? Posted by: Bearzerker
So...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 9, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... a soldier disputing Pillsy's claims is a "suicide bomber"... and now a kid in a commercial is a "human shield".

So they are using the language of terrorism against those who they oppose... stretching it beyond all imagination. The pliant "liberal" media shows little to no outrage over it.

And yet we hear again and again that we need a new judicial system where hearsay and coerced testimony is allowed, where various safeguards are not present for the defendant, we need the ability to hold people who have not committed a crime, we have blackwater... an ostensibly paramilitary organization.. not a disaster relief or preparedness organization... getting contracts to work in numerous states, we have a president who wants to be able to declare citizens exempt from constitutional protections, and rule of law is going down the drain.

Anyone else seeing a very troubling picture emerging here????

No tyrant and no police state has ever sold its populace on its real goals. They have ALWAYS told the populace that they are protecting them... that they HAVE to do what they are doing to keep them safe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So... Posted by: VZEQICVA
Ho sadly stupid!
Posted by: farhada on Oct 9, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a person who lives with the comfort of free health care in Europe, I just don't understand the sick behavior of people who say they are followers of Jesus and blame to be compassionate.

How can a person with dignity attack a sick kid, that is beyond cruelty, this is in-humane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What did you expect?
Posted by: outlander55 on Oct 9, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These neo-conservatives Do not care one bit about anyone but themselves. How the richest ten percent can build a political base escapes me. Anyone who makes less than $75,000 a year and votes republican is misguided and/or ignorant to say the least. The repugnants only care about one thing. Their own personal wealth.
It is time for universal health care! We are the only industrial country in the world that pays for a basic right. Shut down the profit mongering insurance companies and let's have universal health care. If something is not done soon, more and more Americans will go broke or die due to this travesty.
Good night and good luck...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PAINTING YOUR OWN PICTURE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 9, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anything can be created with numbers. People save for education and then look for ways to hide the money so that they can "look poor' and qualify for aid. Assets are moved so people can "look poor" and qualify for more State Aid when they get old. This is al called FINANACIAL PLANNING. The impact is on the poor. I'd like to see "all" the numbers on this kid and his family. We aren't seeing the whole picture. I feel sorry for the boy. Boehner is a jerk. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ENOUGH!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 9, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I find so, SO, angering and depressing about politicians in general, and republicans in particular, is their overwhelming, almost pathological, lack of humanity – and this attack on a 12-year-old boy by the right-wing spin machine is a very good example of that inhumanity.

We vote our politicians into office, and pay their bloated salaries with our tax dollars, in the hope that they will be our advocates, that they will do what is in the best interest of ALL americans. What do we get in return? Political game playing, placing their own narrow interests and the equally narrow interests of their political parties over the health and security, and even lives, of their own people. We hope to elect statesmen, and what we get are selfish sycophants, gorging themselves at the trough of corporate America while savaging kids for needing healthcare. Pathetic.

It is time to vote ALL of them out of office, to scare the crap out of them and their replacements; it is time to remind these overpaid cretins we laughingly call our "leaders" just whom they work for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NOUGH! Posted by: bettyn
More than just sad!
Posted by: Jammer2 on Oct 9, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with several folks that this is as anti-Christian a position as anyone could take, I fear that it's motivations are far worse than mere stupidity. An immoral thread runs through both the Democratic and Republican parties which has become very apparent to a lot of people lately. It seems that to be a good Republican, one must first be either a closet homosexual, a pedophile, or any one of many other sexual perverts hiding in the shadows. The number of Republican party members arrested for sexual offenses over the past ten years is staggering. Look it up on any of the search engines, it'll turn your stomach as you read a political who's who of sexual perversion in this country. It seems that the more conservative and family oriented a person projects himself to be, the more perversions that he has hiding in his closet.

On the other side of that same coin, the Democrats love to act the victim of big business while they are actually a high priced whore in bed with those very same corporations. The more money a corporation throws on the bed, the more "generous" the hooker is with her talents. The word "sad" does not come close to describing the sickness of our political system in this country today.

I believe that maybe it's time for a bonafide third party to enter the political fray. I'm just not sure how long it will take before they are as corrupt as the two that we have now! I don't know what it's going to take to fix this system, but "We the People" had better get our act together and figure it out before one of these ruling parties sells us to the highest bidder. It's up to us, the American voters, to fix this problem soon, or we can kiss our collective asses goodbye!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More than just sad! Posted by: Ruth Lawrence
Picking on poor children...
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 9, 2007 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's just great, George and Dicky. Just wonderful.

Tell me why these two bloodless pieces of crap are still in office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Picking on poor children... Posted by: realmuzik
Kids whose family income is $50k to $83,000 annually are not poor
Posted by: Nugeman on Oct 9, 2007 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet they would have qualified for tax-payer funded coverage.
As well as illegal aliens. This plan was flawed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]