Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

73,000 GM Autoworkers On Strike for More Job Security

Posted by Melissa McEwan at 5:56 AM on September 25, 2007.


Melissa McEwan: "It's our duty. It's the only power we have," says Eric Lehtonen, 50, who works at the Lansing Grand River assembly plant.
uaw2
uaw

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Melissa McEwan, originally appeared on Shakesville

For the first time in 37 years:

UAW officials said the 73,000 UAW members who work at about 80 U.S. facilities for the nation's largest automaker didn't strike Monday over what many thought would trip up the talks: A plan to shift the retiree health care burden from the company to the union. They said they also didn't strike over wages.
They said union members walked out because they want GM to promise that future cars and trucks such as the replacement for the Chevrolet Cobalt small car or the still-on-the-drawing board Chevrolet Volt plug-in electric car will be built at U.S. plants, preserving union jobs.
The strike puts GM, which is restructuring so it can better compete with Asian automakers, in a bind as some of its new products begin to catch on with consumers. But it also means workers are taking a big risk -- giving up pay and slowing down GM in an uncertain economy.

The Teamsters transportation union also said this afternoon that it wouldn't cross UAW picket lines to deliver GM cars and trucks.

"It's our duty. It's the only power we have."--Eric Lehtonen, 50, of DeWitt Township who works at the Lansing Grand River assembly plant, where the Cadillac CTS, STS and SRX are made.

Digg!

Tagged as: labor, gm, uaw, automobile industry

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Fred Phelps' Church Protesting Outside Sasha and Malia Obama's School
Scary.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Labor dead yet?
Posted by: messedup on Sep 25, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The UAW is striking for job security only. Like any American government or coporate entity these days they tell the employees nothing. I have never seen so much apprehension in the leadership realm than ever before in the U.S. They have money, are greedy, and won't make any promises to the little guys who do the work.

Anotherwards nobody seems to know what is really going on anymore and most of the old farts in charge think they can outsource with the click of a mouse button.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Labor dead yet? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Labor dead yet? Posted by: Denver Dem
» RE: Labor dead yet? Posted by: rotorooter
I'M WITH THE GM EMPLOYEES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 25, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporations have been crying poverty for a long time now. Retirement pay/benefits are nothing more than deferred compensation. Cash that people didn't get because they chose to save for retirement. The company agreed to certain terms and now it's time to pay up. Time would have been better spent 25 yrs. ago by paying attention to Toyota & Nissan back when they began to make a better car and people bought them. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Edwards to the rescue
Posted by: Landbaron on Sep 25, 2007 3:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all need to help him get elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOHN EDWARDS TO THE RESCUE
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Sep 25, 2007 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
EACH AND EVERY UNION WORKER AS WELL AS EVERY OTHER NEEDS JOHN EDWARDS FOR PRESIDENT. The people with the big money will use the same old tactics "WORKING WITHIN THE SYSTEM". JOHN EDWARDS WILL ELIMINATE THE INSURANCE COMPANIES AND DRUG COMPANIES AS WELL AS LOBBYISTS FROM THE SCENE. HE WANTS TO INSURE THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE "ARE THE GOVERNMENT" LIKE ORIGINALLY PLANNED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]