Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Did a Right Wing White House Reporter Conspire With Bush to Bash Dems, MoveOn?

Posted by Amanda Terkel at 2:00 PM on September 21, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: Bill Sammon, nicknamed "Superstretch" by Bush, enjoys more access to the commander-in-chief than any other journalist.
sammon3
Sammon

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, originally appeared on Think Progress

At the end of yesterday's press conference, a reporter asked President Bush what was his "reaction" to MoveOn.org's Gen. Petraeus ad in the New York Times. The question -- the last of the briefing -- gave Bush an opportunity to express his disappointment in the "leaders of the Democrat party":

I thought the ad was disgusting. I felt like the ad was an attack not only on General Petraeus, but on the U.S. military. And I was disappointed that not more leaders in the Democrat Party spoke out strongly against that kind of ad. And that leads me to come to this conclusion: that most Democrats are afraid of irritating a left-wing group like MoveOn.org -- or more afraid of irritating them than they are of irritating the United States military. That was a sorry deal. It's one thing to attack me; it's another thing to attack somebody like General Petraeus.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the question came from Washington Examiner reporter Bill Sammon, who is also a frequent Fox News guest and formerly a Washington Times reporter. Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank notes that Bush was in "need of a pick-me-up" after a series of tough questions on the economy, Iraq, and SCHIP. Therefore, he "looked toward the back of the room" and personally chose Sammon, aka "Big Stretch."

Sammon has written four books on Bush, enjoying a close relationship and unprecedented access. His bio for speaking engagements brags:
Six-foot-seven inch Bill Sammon-nicknamed "Superstretch" by President Bush-enjoys more access to the commander-in-chief than any other journalist. Sammon has spent hours with Bush in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One-even in the President's sprawling Texas ranch. As Senior White House Correspondent for the Washington Examiner, Bill Sammon travels with Bush wherever he goes and was with him on September 11, when his presidency was utterly transformed by the terrorist attacks.

Sammon's friendly softball paid off for the Bush administration. This morning, NBC's Today Show covered Bush's comments condemning MoveOn and Democrats, as did last night's NBC Nightly News and ABC World News. The AP reported on Bush's remarks, noting that he "criticized Democrats for not immediately condemning the MoveOn.org ad, which he called 'disgusting.'"

UPDATE: Last night on MSNBC, Keith Olbermann called out Bush for picking Sammon as the last question, so that there was "no chance at a follow-up" to point out that Bush was the one who actually "interjected General Petraeus into the political dialogue of this nation in the first place."

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, petraeus, moveon.org, sammon, conservative media

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A shill?
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Sep 22, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya THINK?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

remember Jeff Gannon, the whitehouse pay-for-playboy?
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Sep 24, 2007 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
queer eye for the supposedly straight guy.

if they aren't physically doing it he's at least takin' it up the wrong 'un in a metaphorical way for the administration. good job, brownie. america is safer knowing you are reporting the truth to the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: sui_generis on Sep 22, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about it folks, pretty much EVERYone in the White House Press Corps HAS to be a shill for the administration, otherwise every other week you'd see a televised meltdown where one of the reporters asked the President a question designed to out him as an evil moron and a liar. We never see this. Even Helen Thomas, a good woman, would only go so far. Anyone ever ask themselves why? You'd think there would be at least ONE journalist who would be willing to say "fuck it" and sacrifice his White House access to go after the evil bastards on live TV, wouldn't you? I wonder why there isn't...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: . Posted by: carcinoid112
Shills and the corporate controlled media.
Posted by: Christie on Sep 22, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You think there is a connection? Nah, just a coincidence.

They do not have hold of the Internet yet though. Did you hear that MoveOn got donations totally $500,000 in response to their Petraeus ad and an announcement that they planned to run another ad--on a vote by Congress on a bill, I think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just another tool
Posted by: allyourbasearebelongtous on Sep 22, 2007 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
sammon is just another tool of the neo-authoritarian hard right bush and gop administration/state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 24, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if he was also the one to ask Tony Snow about his :ivestrong bracelet at his first press conference with the WH.... same softball questioning.

And really, Bushy.. why are you dissapointed in people not involved with the ad???????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]