Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rather Sues CBS for $70 Million, Says He Was Scapegoated to Pacify White House

Posted by GottaLaff at 2:00 PM on September 19, 2007.


GottaLaff: Dan Rather was told in 2004 that he was losing his CBS radio show, effective immediately, because of pressure from the right wing.
050111rathervmed2p.widec
Dan Rather

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by GottaLaff, originally appeared on Brave New Films

I can't seem to stay away from CBS today:

The NYTimes' Jacques Steinberg breaks news about former CBS News anchor Dan Rather. Rather "filed a $70 million lawsuit this afternoon against the network, its corporate parent and three of his former superiors."

Why? Here's why:

Rather, Steinberg writes "asserts that the network violated his contract by giving him insufficient airtime on 60 Minutes after forcing him to step down as anchor of the CBS Evening News in March 2005. He also contends that the network committed fraud by commissioning a 'biased' and incomplete investigation of the flawed [National] Guard broadcast and, in the process, 'seriously damaged his reputation.'"

Ya think?

In the suit, filed this afternoon in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, Mr. Rather charges that CBS and its executives made him a scapegoat in an attempt to pacify the White House, though the formal complaint presents virtually no direct evidence to that effect. To buttress this claim, Mr. Rather quotes the executive who oversaw his regular segment on CBS Radio, telling Mr. Rather in November 2004 that he was losing that slot, effective immediately, because of pressure from the right wing.

He also continues to take vehement issue with the appointment by CBS of Richard Thornburgh, an attorney general in the administration of the elder President Bush, as one of the two outside panelists given the job of reviewing how the disputed broadcast had been prepared. [...]

Mr. Rather says in the filing that he allowed himself to be reduced to little more than a patsy in the furor that followed, after CBS and later the outside panel it commissioned concluded that the report was based on documents that could not be authenticated. Under pressure, Mr. Rather says, he delivered a public apology on his newscast on Sept. 20, 2004 written not by him but by a CBS corporate publicist despite his own personal feelings that no public apology from him was warranted.

He now leads a weekly news program on HDNet an obscure cable channel in which he is seen by only a small fraction of the millions of viewers who once turned to him in his heyday to receive the news of the day.

Digg!

Tagged as: media, bush administration, cbs, rather

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Study Shows 'Center-Right Nation' Narrative Spiked Immediately After Election Day
We're not talking about theory anymore - we're talking about empirical fact.
Post by David Sirota. November 21, 2008.
Will Gen. Jim Jones Be Obama's National Security Advisor?
Although not as bad as keeping Gates as Secretary of Defense it would still be a very disappointing selection.
Post by Chris Bowers. November 21, 2008.
Obama's (Rumored) Pick for Secretary of the Treasury Makes Wall Street Happy
He's going to be the Secretary of the Treasury in the midst of a financial crisis, so it's probably worth taking the time to get to know him.
Post by Steve Benen. November 21, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I miss Dan...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Sep 19, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I miss Walter, heck I even miss Bob Schieffer (I hope I spelled his name right)...

But what I miss most is Honest to God Reporters! I'm so sick of being fed sugar-coated pablum from make believe "Reporters who's only claim to fame is having a pretty face. Even PBS is owned by the freakin oil companies.

I hope Danny boy wins and wins Big!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About time!
Posted by: jontan88 on Sep 19, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish more people who have been slimed and attacked by the Republicans and their tools (CBS, ABC and Fox - wait, Fox IS the Republican Party), would strike back instead of playing nice or being scared. John Kerry should have sued the Swift Boat liars for defamation of character, libel and slander. Valerie Plame should have sued Michael Novak et al. Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Bill O'Rielly and all the rest of those clowns on the fascist right should be sued and sued big for all the lies about people that they propagade on a daily basis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FINALLY SOME GOOD NEWS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 19, 2007 6:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dan Rather got screwed. I wondered if he would ever take action of any kind. His report was accurate. The fact that some people didn't like it, has nothing to do with reporting. As long as it's the truth. And it was. Good for him. Thank,s ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He was a colorful commentator.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 19, 2007 6:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I enjoyed his style.

Having said that, I don't know how well the Craig defensive offense is going to work out for him:

Under pressure, Mr. Rather says, he delivered a public apology on his newscast on Sept. 20, 2004 written not by him but by a CBS corporate publicist despite his own personal feelings that no public apology from him was warranted.

Are the suits he's suing the same exec's (the ones that were supposed to do make sure somebody did the fact checking) that were also fired?

Good luck to ol' Dan, in spite of it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DAN RATHER WAS FIRED BECAUSE HE TOLD THE TRUTH
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Sep 19, 2007 9:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OUR COUNTRY HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER BY PURE TRASH. BECAUSE OF IT, WE ARE HATED AROUND THE WORLD. I FIND IT MIGHTY STRANGE THAT REPUBLICANS ARE HAPPY TO LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL AS LONG AS THEY DOMINATE. IN FACT, THEY SEEM PROUD OF THEIR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR BUT DEMAND THAT DEMS BE PURE AS THE DRIVEN SNOW. THEY ARE HYPOCRITES. WE MUST DEMAND A TRUE INVESTIGATION OF THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good luck Dan
Posted by: Doubtom on Sep 20, 2007 12:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is way overdue and I hope all of the network's dirty laundry is hung for all to view! Go get em Dan!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rather's Public "Execution" Was a Political Hit
Posted by: Tim Brown on Sep 20, 2007 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a chapter in the Greg Palast book Armed Madhouse called "The Necklace-ing of Dan Rather" where Palast tells the real story about how then-Lt. Governor Ben Barnes leaned on the Texas Air National Guard to get a young Bush into flight school and later leaned on then-Governor Bush for a lucrative favor to keep his mouth shut about it during the 2000 Presidential campaign. It's a textbook example of why they say 'All politics is local'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's Something You Can Do
Posted by: PJAW on Sep 20, 2007 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call your two senators today and ask them to vote no on the ridiculous resolution to condemn MoveOn.org for their ad about General Petraeus's testimony (wherein they asked if he shouldn't instead be called "betrayus").

It's once again a glaring example of hypocrisy that the "right" would promote this resolution while having sat idly by during the "swiftboating" of John Kerry and doing nothing to reign in Regnery Publishing, who was responsible for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YOU GO, DAN!
Posted by: nikolai on Sep 20, 2007 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SIC 'EM DAN! ATTA BOY!! This is SO sweet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]