Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Who Is Michael Mukasey and Should He Be Attorney General?

Posted by Steve Benen at 6:09 AM on September 17, 2007.


Steve Benen: Among other things, he's a conservative Republican, playing an active role in Giuliani's nutty presidential campaign.
mukasey
Michael Mukasey

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

Chasing Attorney General rumors has proven to be rather pointless. Initially, Department of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff was practically already prepping for his confirmation hearings. Then, the White House leaked a short list, sans Chertoff, and Ted Olson was the likely nominee.

Now we have a new front-runner for the job: Michael Mukasey, a former judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, whose name was on the leaked short-list from last week.

The sources said that President Bush is close to announcing his nominee, possibly doing so as early as tomorrow, and that Mukasey has vaulted to the top over other contenders, including former solicitor general Theodore B. Olson, whose chances may have been damaged after the Senate's top Democrat vowed to block his confirmation.

One source close to the White House, describing Mukasey as the clear "front-runner," said Bush advisers appear to have decided that "they didn't want a big fight over attorney general" in the Senate, especially when other qualified candidates are also available. The source said Olson, who represented Bush in the Supreme Court fight over the contested 2000 election, would be seen as "very political," despite his outstanding legal credentials.

Another well-connected GOP source, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity in discussing internal White House deliberations, said that Mukasey is "the leading candidate." He described Mukasey -- the former chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York -- as a conservative on counterterrorism issues, such as electronic surveillance, and said that he has a solid reputation and is seen by Bush aides as "confirmable."

Oddly enough, Mukasey's principal problem, should he be the nominee, is that he may draw fire from the right, not the left.

For one thing, conservatives wanted Olson, not just because of his record as a conservative ideologue, but also because the right relished a high-profile fight with Senate Democrats over the Attorney General vacancy. Conservatives don't care about "confirmable"; they care about partisan warfare.

But more importantly, the right doesn't perceive Mukasey as "one of them."

"Conservatives might have some serious concerns with Mukasey," said one Republican close to the White House. "He's not well known in the community."

Even worse, the progressive legal community doesn't seem to hate him too much. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has been encouraging White House counsel Fred Fielding for a Mukasey nomination, and the Alliance for Justice, a liberal legal group, suggested in 2005 that Mukasey would be a conservative-but-fair Supreme Court nominee.

These are not exactly the kind of accolades conservatives want to hear.

How serious could the right's opposition really be? It's hard to imagine the circumstances that would lead to a full-scale conservative revolt against a Mukasey nomination (a la Miers, Harriet), but there will likely be quite a bit of grumbling. The AP noted that Brian Burch, president of a conservative Catholic-based advocacy group called Fidelis, started getting calls early Saturday from members of his group and other conservative groups who were worried that Bush was getting ready to nominate Mukasey. "His federal judicial record has been at times hostile to the issues that we care and have concern about, like abortion," Burch said.

My hunch is, should Mukasey get the nod, conservative "concerns" won't amount to much. Indeed, it's hard to imagine the circumstances that would lead to a full-scale revolt against a Mukasey nomination (a la Miers, Harriet). Senate Republicans are likely to give Bush what he wants; Bill Kristol has endorsed him in a piece overnight (under a headline that read, "Michael Mukasey to be Attorney General... And conservatives should be happy"); and Bush only has a year left in office anyway, making Mukasey a short-timer from the outset.

I don't want to mischaracterize Mukasey as some kind of reasonable moderate that Dems should embrace. He's a conservative Republican, playing an active role in Rudy Giuliani's nutty presidential campaign.

But at first blush, he does appear to be one of the better nominees we can hope for out of this White House. Stay tuned.

Digg!

Tagged as: mukasey, giuliani, bush administration, justice department, attorney general

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Labor Leader Argues for Workers' Interests Over Racism in Explosive Speech
Richard Trumka is taking on the issue of race to support the presidential candidate he thinks will do the most for the American worker.
Post by Tula Connell. August 21, 2008.
McCain's Money History and Why it Matters
McCain has led an aristocratic lifestyle as a consort to a liquor heiress, and it shows.
Post by Digby. August 21, 2008.
Poll-watch: Gallup Finds Wedding-Cake Sized Marriage Gap in Pres Race
Apparently, the married and unmarried have very different concerns.
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He has quite the history...
Posted by: eastkyprogressive on Sep 17, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to his Wikipedia entry...
Chief Judge Mukasey also heard the trial of Jose Padilla, ruling that the U.S. citizen and alleged terrorist could be held as an enemy combatant but was entitled to see his lawyers. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center.

If that isn't enough to give someone additional pause, I don't know what is...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I suppose...
Posted by: Bbear41 on Sep 17, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...That any Bush nominee to the left of Ann Coulter should be considered a blessing...of sorts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COULD BE WORSE (?)
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 17, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not much of a standard. There is no need for Mukasey to be confirmed just because he's 'not as bad as Gonzales'. This should be an opportunity to raise the bar just a little. Vote them down until Bush appoints someone we can truly live with. Can't they get it through their heads that they are not in office to make George happy. We put them there. This is about us. If we want our country back this is a good place to start. it's not about making do. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad commentary...
Posted by: Quannah on Sep 17, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when "he's not as bad as Gonzales" is the standard that we measure against. Our problem throughout this entire administration is that (Democratic & Republican) lawmakers have forsaken their duties and given this president a rubber stamp on all political appointees from cabinet officials to Supreme Court justices. I agree wholeheartedly... we should expect more, and now is the time to finally stand up. Although it's hard to stand up without a backbone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Skeletons
Posted by: luckypuck on Sep 17, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Center for American Progress says, “Mukasey has shown an independent streak that should serve him well if he maintains it in his new job,” and thus won’t be the Bush lapdog Gonzales was. Disappointingly, the Center thereby subscribes to the growing notion that Mukasey is acceptable because he is “not as bad as Gonzales.”

Surely the ability to be independent of partisan politics is a sine qua non of any AG candidate. The problem is whether he has the ability to STAY independent once confirmed.

I can’t help but wonder if any of the potential candidates on the Bush’s long or short list are picked because they each have skeletons in their closet that can be exploited after they are confirmed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Federalist Society or not..?
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 17, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Mukasey a member of The Federalist Society is what I want to know..

It will also be significant as to if the federalist Society approves of him otherwise if not an active member and if they sit beside him and hold his hand all through the nomination procedure as they did with, "Sammy boy" Alito..!

One of the reasons the Justice Debt is so fucked up and a laughing stock and dysfunctional is that it has become infested with these Federalist Society whack job zealot Troy swine..sycophants..QED..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raise the bar!
Posted by: g on Sep 17, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with previous commentators. What is it, that even with a Democratic majority we still have to accept any crappy nominee from King George as long as it's not Voldemort or Gonzales (not sure which one is worse)? Remember how the "left" drew a deep breath because John Roberts after all was not as bad as some? Yes, they said, he's a conservative, but a fair and reasonable one. Well, surprise surprise: turns out he is BAD. He is a conservative corporate whore who thinks that school students don't have free speech (Morse v. Frederick ), but well-funded religious nutcases do (Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.). I do not want another John Roberts or another "Scalito". I won't be holding my breath for the Dems getting their balls back, tho. I know that with so many good fights it's hard to decide that you want to fight them all. But this guy will be AG for a year, and he'll have a chance to do a lot more damage if he wants to. Let's put standards back in place, please. An AG should be more than "not so bad. " He/she should be outstanding, in terms of moral character and scholarship. In other words, he/she should be the opposite of Gonzo, not slightly less bad. This is not George's kingdom to do as he pleases. Will the Dems start doing their job PLEASE???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]