Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Director of National Intelligence Admits Lying to Congress

Posted by GottaLaff at 6:01 AM on September 13, 2007.


GottaLaff: Intel czar Mike McConnell told Congress a new law helped bring down a terror plot. The facts say otherwise.
20070913mc3
Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by GottaLaff, originally appeared on Cliff Schecter's Blog

First get the "news" out, then retract it after it's become "news". Hopefully this time, the Bush assministration will suffer more than the usual embarrassment.

In a new embarrassment for the Bush administration top spymaster, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell is withdrawing an assertion he made to Congress this week that a recently passed electronic-surveillance law helped U.S. authorities foil a major terror plot in Germany.

There's that whole misspeaking thing again, nipping at the heels of the White House. No biggie. All he said was that the FISA law had...

...helped to "facilitate" the arrest of three suspects believed to be planning massive car bombings against American targets in Germany. Other U.S. intelligence-community officials questioned the accuracy of McConnell's testimony and urged his office to correct it.

Spit it out, McConnell. You can do it:

Late Wednesday afternoon, McConnell issued a statement acknowleding that "information contributing to the recent arrests [in Germany] was not collected under authorities provided by the 'Protect America Act'."

The number of lies spewed by the Bush crime family is staggering.

The developments were cited by Democratic critics on Capitol Hill as the latest example of the Bush administration's exaggerated claims--and contradictory statements--about ultrasecret surveillance activities. In the face of such complaints, the administration has consistently resisted any public disclosure about the details of the surveillance activities--even thought McConnell himself has openly talked about some aspects of them.

I bet he has some innocent explanation. Don't you bet that? I bet that he does.

Counterterrorism officials familiar with the background of McConnell's testimony said they did not believe the intel czar made inaccurate statements intentionally as part of any strategy by the administration to goad Congress into making the new eavesdropping law permanent. Officials said they believed McConnell gave the wrong answer because he was overwhelmed with information and merely mixed up his facts.

The "intel czar"--that's the czar that handles double-secret-spy stuff--is just overwhelmed with mountains of intelly-type info and got his facts all mixed up--I'm sorry, "merely" mixed up--and became faint and spinny-headed and, um, lied.

What was that, again, about America being safer than it was in 2001?

Digg!

Tagged as: fisa, bush administration, terrorism, intelligence, mcconnell

GottaLaff is a regular blogger for Cliff Schecter's Blog


Laura Flanders: Vanity Fair's Retort to the New Yorker's Obama Cover Misses the Mark
If Vanity Fair wanted to flip the New Yorker cover on the GOP, they'd have to portray the media's lies about the candidate. Not the true stuff.
Post by Laura Flanders. July 24, 2008.
Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime
A new report finds the Air Force is spending counterterrorism funds on luxury in-flight seating for military and civilian leaders.
Post by Liliana Segura. July 24, 2008.
The Power of Panties For Peace
"Some might say, 'it can't happen here,' but I'm here to warn you that it can. A fifth column of pantie warriors has arisen in the netroots."
Post by General JC Christian. July 24, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 13, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress will do NOTHING about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And... Posted by: outlander55
Does anyone know if McConnell was sworn in when he lied???
Posted by: Prophit on Sep 13, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Petreass, he probably wasn't and that is what CONGRESS GETS WHEN YOU DON'T SWEAR THESE PSYCHOS IN BEFORE TESTILYING. Is there absolutley no one in Congress, the White HOuse or elected to public office who isn't lying about something all the time???

Really, its getting to be an exercise in cynicism to listen to these guys. I don't do it anymore. This past 5 years are the least amount of listening to them that I have ever done and its been revealing to have made that decision. It is sooooo time to clean house.

For the first time ever, I am advocating voting third party if the candidates on both sides are other than Kucinich, Gravel on the dem side or Ron Paul on the repub side.
Why? I am beginning to see that voting for one of the two major parties makes no difference for us out here. We have absolutely nothing to lose by voting 3rd party and thus we take away their legitimacy if they get under 50 % in a win while the third party gets a chunk which sends that message. Hillary against Thompson is a loser for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I keep... Posted by: Bbear41
he put the lie out in the public arena where he wanted it to be
Posted by: nebgirl on Sep 13, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he achieved his goal of getting the lie into the public arena where it will now become fact like Saddam being responsible for 9/11. Something like 40% of the American people still believe Saddam was behind 9/11. Isn't it a coincidence that gen. Petraeus came before Congress the day before the anniv. of 9/11, further reinforcing the lie of a connection between 9/11 and Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Politically-convenient exaggeration" - a gift for Lieberman?
Posted by: eddie torres on Sep 13, 2007 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ryan Singel at Threat Level includes the transcript of the relevant exchange between Lieberman (I-Conn) and DNI McConnell:

"Lieberman: The newly adopted law facilitated [the German arrests] during August?

McConnell: Yes sir, it did."


In August, McConnell told a Texas newspaper that US spy laws needed to be loosened, that the public debate in Congress over PAA and FISA was killing Americans, and that McConnell's interview with the newspaper was killing Americans.

If DNI McConnell thinks the real enemies are Congress and the press, and PAA really wasn't a factor in the German arrests, then why did McConnell suddenly forget the sensitivity of the PAA issue and deliver "politically-convenient exaggerations" to Lieberman in particular?

GottaLaff hints that the US may be less safe now than in 2001; Ryan Singel suggests the DNI is cooking his arguments; Lieberman is happy playing roadblock to the truth and cheerleader for more war. Not a very satisfactory state of affairs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lying to congress... loss of security clearance?
Posted by: Bearzerker on Sep 13, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are caught lying to Congress
how in hell can you be given a security clearance vital to do this job...

dammit peeps, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out... take this slime's security clearance and replace him, ASAP...

Besides, hes a threat to more than National security, he's a threat to international security

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]