Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Don't Buy Wal-Mart's Greenwashing

Posted by Tara Lohan at 2:18 PM on September 12, 2007.


Tara Lohan: The retail giant wants to get on the popular eco-bandwagon, but Wal-Mart Watch won't let 'em.
walmartstory
walmart

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Sensing the shift in eco-consciousness that has gone mainstream in the last year, Wal-Mart is working hard to re-brand itself as a "green" company.

But don't be fooled. It is going to take a lot more than changing their light-bulbs for anyone to take them seriously. The group Wal-Mart Watch has done some digging on Wal-Mart's enviro initiatives and found some interesting facts. Although the retail giant announced goals to cut CO2 by 2 million metric tons in six years, at their current growth rate, their new stores will use more energy than any of the energy saving measure they are going to employ.

Here's an overview from Wal-Mart Watch's report "It's Not Easy Being Green: The Truth About Wal-Mart's Environmental Makeover":

Its fleet of trucks, massive overseas shipping to import its goods, and the increasing vehicle miles traveled by its consumers all contribute heavily to CO 2 emissions and the number of ozone-causing particulates released into the air. Its huge stores and even larger parking lots contribute to the degradation of our water supply, affecting our drinking water and the viability of aquatic life. Its support of anti-environment candidates has helped forward the policies of the current Bush Administration, the same Administration rebuked by the Supreme Court and the former Vice President within the past few months for its handling of environmental policy.
Because the company is always expanding and adding newer, bigger stores, there are now about 300 vacant Wal-Marts at any given time across the US. The company is also facing fines and other penalties in dozens of states. The report states: "Lost in the sex discrimination and race discrimination class actions and the large number of wage and hour cases is the reality that Wal-Mart has been charged with a multitude of environmental violations over the course of the past ten years. Charges have come from both state and federal environmental officials costing Wal-Mart millions in penalties -- and costing the environment even more."

The report does give a small amount of credit to Wal-Mart's efforts thus far (like their controversial organics program), but ultimately concludes that what the company has done is really just glossing over more important environmental concerns and problems.

The reality is that big box retailing is never going to be sustainable.

What is especially worrisome, however, is that Wal-Mart's green initiatives have diverted attention away from its most damaging source for pollution -- American drivers. Big box retailing is a fundamentally unsustainable method of distributing goods to consumers, and as the big box retail sector has grown, so have the number of miles consumers are forced to travel while running errands. In 2005, Wal-Mart published a calculation of its own carbon footprint, revealing that its U.S. operations were responsible for 5.3 million metric tons of CO2 emissions.
The basic environmental facts just scratch the surface in how Mal-Mart's business practices affect the health of communities. Read the full report and find out more. And as always, think before you shop.

Digg!

Tagged as: wal-mart, box stores, consumers, small businesses, carbon

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


How Congress May Keep Bloggers Out of Jail
Harvard's Citizen Media Law Project will provide free legal services for online media, just as Congress is trying to provide protection for traditional journalists and bloggers.
Post by Ari Melber. November 23, 2009.
Is Taxing Plastic Surgery Sexist?
Part of the funding for the Senate's health care bill will come from a 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgery, on procedures overwhelmingly obtained by women.
Post by Jill Filipovic. November 23, 2009.
Lieberman's Latest B.S. Excuse for Opposing Health Reform
Another month, another justification.
Post by Steve Benen. November 23, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?