Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Disney Finally Ready to Portray a Black Woman

Posted by Garlin II at 12:00 PM on September 12, 2007.


Garlin II: I've got mixed feelings. Disney's had opportunities to show the uniqueness of non-white cultures in its films, but has failed miserably at doing so.
tiana
tiana

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Garlin II, originally appeared on Brave New Films

Disney, the 800,000,000 pound gorilla of kids fantasy entertainment, announced that they are going forward with their plans to have their first Black princess in 2009's The Frog Princess.

Disney has had opportunities to show the uniqueness of non-white cultures in it's films, but has failed miserably at doing so in a respectful, non-stereotypical way (see Aladdin and Mulan). I have zero confidence that this film will be any different.

This is doubly dangerous given how Black women are portrayed in today's media. Bringing back up the Aunt Jemima images of old and coupling them today's over-sexualization of Black women and the racist indifference shown towards Black women sets the table for a pretty nasty racial stereotype feast.

I, like others, have mixed feelings about this. It's good for Black girls to be able to see Black girls/women as princesses/queens on the big screen. For people in general, it's great to see "positive images" of others, and this is especially true of minority and marginalized populations. I've yet to find a little girl that didn't want to be a princess (which is actually, ironically, also Disney's fault). Now little Black girls can say, "I want to be Princess Tiana."

Not too many good things in life come without negatives, and this is no different. Perhaps more important than Princess Tiana herself is they way that her environment and surrounding characters are presented. The film is to take place in segregated 1920s New Orleans at the height of the Jazz Age. The questions abound here:

* Will the segragtion be shown or ignored?
* Will the other Black characters be characters or caricatures?
* Will the images suggest that New Orleans and the segregated south are actually part of real American history?

I wonder how many Black people are included in the planning/production of this film? How many of them have some degree of control of an image of their own race? It is imperative that minority and marginalized peoples assert control over their images and portrayal. How much more compelling and powerful is the image of someone when crafted by that person? Think more Antwone Fisher and less Apocolypto.

Brave New Films blog readers know how slanted and biased the media is (e.g. Fox Attacks, Outfoxed, Uncovered: The War on Iraq, etc.). Well,"the media" is not simply limited to the infotainment media; it applies to entertainment as well.

Digg!

Tagged as: media, race, film, children, disney, entertainment

Garlin II is a regular blogger for Brave New Films.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"i haven't seen the film but i know i won't like it"
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Sep 12, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
well, so much for keeping an open mind.

negative hopes, anyone? i work with someone who does the same thing, applies her negative outlook to things that really have nothing to do with her, that she has no power over, or she has not experienced but finds the possibility that the experience MIGHT be distasteful. what a sh*tty outlook when there is nothing between you and the sunlight and you complain about how it will soon get dark.

truth and cinema? i wouldn't expect much from disney (or any film studio) to err on the side of truth. ever watch 50's westerns? how many black cowboys did you see on the big screens (1 in 4 real cowboys, it is estimated, was black). truth and cinema? we can only hope disney doesn't offend- at least not much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pfft! it's twoo! it's twoo! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Note the Euro-centric dress
Posted by: redceres on Sep 12, 2007 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Nuff said

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

disney
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Sep 12, 2007 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't matter. no one should buy any of disney's whitewash bullshit. these are the motherfucker's that let abc air a fucking lie 911 docudrama piece of shit. they just want your money all the while despising black people, hispanics, poor people of all colors and anyone who is a democrat. believe me these are the closeted rightwing repugs who couldn't wait to get rid of michael eisner, because he was trying to act like a human being in regards to employees etc. help disney go broke!!! they fucking deserve it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It does not matter because most blacks are too stupid to complain or boycott it
Posted by: Shalimarali on Sep 13, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
* Will the segragtion be shown or ignored?
* Will the other Black characters be characters or caricatures?
* Will the images suggest that New Orleans and the segregated south are actually part of real American history?

I'm sure the segregation will be swept under a rug
I'm sure the other Black characters will be caricatures
I'm sure that the segregated south will swept under a rug

Setting the movie in in 1920's New Orleans is just as dumb.

They may have well used New Orleans 2005 during the Katrina flood and made that character a "princess"

The bad thing about this stupid movie is that black girls will want to see it, just as they oh and ah over Catwoman (hence the oversexualization of black women).

Things won't change until Blacks realize that movies in 2000 are just like movies in the 1930s where blacks are portrayed in NEGATIVE images that don't reflect REAL blacks, but rather the version of blacks that Hollywood wants to pay. And most of the entertainers we have today are SELL-OUTS just like Amos & Andy, Stephin Fetchit and Mammy. But instead of being shuffling coons or mammy they are portrayed as pimps, whores and thugs. But since blacks don't have enough sense to complain or boycott these images, they deserve it. I'm black and I have and can scream, shout and complain to the top of my lungs, but one person cannot and will not make a difference. It kills me to see many family and friends so apathetic about the way blacks are portrayed in the media. They not only don't care, but too many blacks show their kids these stupid images. It is a form of brainwash. Then many parents sit back and wonder why their girls dress like a whore or their boys dress like a thug. It's not only peer pressure, it's a way of life. I wouldn't be surprised if BET was owned by the most conservative republican in the world who makes sure that black youths are fed a daily dose of how to be stupid sambos. But if you don't have enough sense to complain, then you deserve it.

BTW, Disney could have had the senes and decency to base the movie on a real AFRICAN princess, as that really happened. But no, let's make the movie about a stupid caricature that makes black people look stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Song of the South?"
Posted by: antoshakartosha on Sep 13, 2007 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm. A disney movie with black people... and songs... set in the south... How can you blog about a movie like this without even mentioning "Song of the South?"

Of course "Song of the South" has basically been suppressed for years, unavailable on video and certainly not in the theatres-- but surely you have at least heard of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Song of the South?" Posted by: garlinii
Shaking my Remote in Anger
Posted by: madmac10 on Sep 13, 2007 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again we lap up such silly polemics, and click our teeth as if this rant will actually do something. It is a trap, people--the same diversion that keeps us away from the curtain. Hell, I might go so far as to say that Garlin II is even MORE CULPABLE than Disney for spewing this asinine vitriol.

Disney is rendering politically incorrect characters? Really? So what else is new? African American culture is lampooned and exploited? Wow? Go on... As far as I'm concerned, these "critics" are still sucking on Mammon's teat, just as they did (and do) every time they raged against "Superfly" or Jazz for that matter... If it bothers you that much, do something about it.

Start broadcasting conscious music on the internet. Oh, wait--the royalties for playing songs on the internet are now so exhorbitant that you have to be a major media conglomerate to afford them. Well, maybe you can scrounge the money to start a low-power FM station in your community. But you'd better hurry--bandwidth is going fast, and they may be outlawed next year. Start printing a magazine that portays your culture respectfully. Oops! Sorry--the costs for postage are now skewed away from small publishers. Better not rely on a subscriber base...

Meanwhile, there are now more African American directors and producers in Hollywood than ever. Meanwhile, there are more African American entrepeneurs and millionaires than ever in history. Did you know that a major African American animator started at Disney, directing "The Emperor's New Groove" and now produces the "Proud Family" for ABC?

Starting to get a picture? At least Disney has been in the business of exploiting minority cultures for decades (almost a century now.) And yet, Hollywood seems like the best avenue for taking back our media. Keep tilting at that windmill, Garlin II, while the wolves devour the carcass of the counterculture. Yup, that'll sure help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shaking my Remote in Anger Posted by: garlinii
Give it a fricking rest already
Posted by: Libsrule on Sep 13, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly what do you want? A bio pic of the struggle of the black people in America?

Then don't watch Disney. They make CHILDREN'S MOVIES not frekin' documentaries or drivel that makes children NOT want to go to movies. We have hundreds of stations and hundreds of movies that show that. WHY ON GOD' S EARTH do you want to make a movie that brings people down?

Besides Mulan and others didn't show them in a bad light. Rather the opposite. BUT I guess in Victimland where you reside, all Disney movies must show the oppression of the minorities by the white devil and must show the white devil as satan incarnate while showing the beatings, whippings, hangings, suicide bombing, and terror related to all of that?

And you would take your kids to see that, knowing full well they are expecting to see magical things, with songs and love and romance and then slap them upside the head with the Victimization you want? You're an idiot.

Give it a rest already. THEY ARE FREKIN DISNEY MOVIES!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Um, Disney... says 'nuff right there
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 13, 2007 10:51 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is imperative that minority and marginalized peoples assert control over their images and portrayal. How much more compelling and powerful is the image of someone when crafted by that person? Think more Antwone Fisher and less Apocolypto.

ITA. It's one of the reasons artists lacking in melanin stick to writing characters who also lack melanin. And the annoying thing about that is, we get shellacked [sic?] by fellow progressives for not writing characters that have melanin. We're damned if we do and damned if we don't. It's an artistic straight-jacket. Even worse when some asshat producer takes our work and then turns it into a racist caricature despite our best efforts and our plualistic relationships. Not a big deal, just an irritating burden.

Just a stretch here... I wonder if the writer of this newest Disney film felt the same way... but that writer was so friggin' starving that they wrote it and sold it to the Mouse anyway. Which makes me think: maybe we shouldn't lead off with so much judgment all the time. It's far easier just to assume you know another (even when you really don't) and be pissed off. Cuz we all know if your white, you're automatically definitively racist and evil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aladin and Mulan...
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 13, 2007 11:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...weren't the only problematic films... much much worse was Pocohantas... if you're gonna cite to bad racist portrayals by the Mouse, lets get the full spectrum here, shall we? oh wait, the author is a racist too... he never thought to bring in the native american character. [sarcasm only partially intended] See how easy it is to make wild assumptions and eat our own?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aladin and Mulan... Posted by: garlinii
I was thinking more like a PG version of "Idlewild"
Posted by: jimidee on Sep 21, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, there were plenty of stereotypes in that film that meets the author's critera of:

"This is doubly dangerous given how Black women are portrayed in today's media. Bringing back up the Aunt Jemima images of old and coupling them today's over-sexualization of Black women and the racist indifference shown towards Black women sets the table for a pretty nasty racial stereotype feast."

Oh yeah, the characters in 'Idlewild' can NOT be considered racial stereotypes because it was a film about blacks by blacks (OutKast). Black people NEVER cast their women in an oversexualized manner in all of those hip-hop videos...shake that big brown booty girl!!!

I think we just need to face some facts here...black women are sexy, and dancing black women are really, really sexy. And what is wrong with that? There is an obvious preoccupation within the black music industry emphasizing that very fact...just watch a few minutes of BET...I have it on right now! We all know that dancing like that is code for sex standing up.

Well, we can't have any of that in a Disney movie, can we? Never mind...let me get back to my videos.

jimidang

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]